Sentences with phrase «seeing challenges in the courts»

Despite this, we're seeing challenges in the courts to certain vertical arrangements between online booking agencies and hotel chains.

Not exact matches

«This is not a policy we support, and I would note that it has already been challenged in federal court, and some of the order has been enjoined at least temporarily,» Blankfein said, according to a transcript seen by Reuters.

Cryptocurrencies have also seen their anonymity challenged in the courts.

«As well as challenging this in court, the unions are mounting the widest, most co-ordinated industrial action we have seen in our lifetimes, to force the government to think again and show how out of touch millionaire ministers are with the lives and concerns of the rest of us.»

The Court deadlocked on Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association, a 2016 challenge to the standard, following the surprise death of Justice Antonin Scalia, but many court observers see Trump's appointment of Justice Neal Gorsuch breaking the tie in favor of the worCourt deadlocked on Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association, a 2016 challenge to the standard, following the surprise death of Justice Antonin Scalia, but many court observers see Trump's appointment of Justice Neal Gorsuch breaking the tie in favor of the worcourt observers see Trump's appointment of Justice Neal Gorsuch breaking the tie in favor of the workers.

ALBANY, NY (12/28/2011)(readMedia)-- A coalition of CSEA, PEF, UUP, NYSCOPBA, NYSTPBA, NYSPIA, and AFSCME Council 82, unions representing virtually all of New York State employees have filed lawsuits in federal court challenging the Cuomo Administration's unilateral increase in the percentage of health insurance contributions required of state retirees.The legal challenge applies to changes made by the administration this fall and covers state employees who have retired and seen their share of health insurance premium increase beyond the level at which they retired.

The Conservatives successfully challenged the result in court and the election was re-run, but the perception of being a sore loser saw a huge swing against Malone at the subsequent by - election, making Winchester one of the safest Liberal Democrat seat in the country.

ALBANY — As the Capitol waits to see what the anti-corruption Moreland Commission turns up in its preliminary report, state legislators have escalated their involvement in a legal challenge to the commission's subpoenas, court filings show.

Having already been challenged in the courts, Trump's controversial move would see a 90 - day ban on people from Iran, Iraq, Sudan, Syria, Libya, Somalia, and Yemen from coming to America — even those with already issued visas and green card holders.

«My intense desire to see my school excel comes not only from an unwavering belief that all students deserve an excellent education, but also the unique role Sousa played in the civil rights movement,» said Kamras referring to a challenge to segregation at Sousa that culminated in Bolling v. Sharpe, the 1954 Supreme Court case that paved the way for the desegregation of all DC public schools.

Another NES - made exam is currently being challenged in a New York federal court lawsuit, charging that state's test is racially biased and not job related (see Examiner, Summer 1996).

These two concepts — funding equity and funding adequacy — have featured in court challenges to state funding systems in different ways over time (See Overview of School Finance Litigation below).

High income bankruptcy cases filed in the bankruptcy court in Rochester NY are always scrutinized very carefully, and I am fully familiar with the challenges faced by these debtors (see the Kornfield case, described below.)

The Court of Justice of the European Union upheld consumers» rights to care and assistance in 2013 after Ryanair challenged it (see the Ryanair ordered to pay costs MSE News story).

If the trade associations decide to band together to challenge the new FTC rules in court, it appears clear it will be seen by regulators and others as nothing more than a desperate attempt of an industry whose members have been labeled as engaging in deceptive and abusive practices to continue those bad acts.

More importantly, perhaps, the caveat is also a sure harbinger of legal action — a promise that, should the DEA choose to deny, or simply ignore, the permit application of an otherwise qualified North Dakota farmer, the agency is sure to see challenged in federal court its attempts to quash the inclusion of industrial hemp in regular crop rotation.

But the challenges in using § 115 (both Congressional intent and what we've already seen from the courts) to regulate GHGs make any successful outcome practically impossible.

The preliminary reference (for an overview see Bassini and Pollicino), by which the Italian Constitutional Court (the «ICC») challenged the judgment of the European Court of Justice (the «ECJ») in C - 105 / 14, Taricco I, has already generated a heated debate online (see for instance here and here).

The case was referred by the High Court in February 2015 (see [2015] EWHC 248 (Admin)-RRB- following a challenge by Rosneft to UK statutory instruments giving effect to the sanctions, and the legality of the underlying sanctions against the Russian oil sector.

As this is seen as yet another case that is described as an ongoing law enforcement challenge to the First Amendment of the Constitution against area activists, Iannicelli was in court on Tuesday, and Brandt appeared on Wednesday to express that they intend to move their cases forward.

These were to address one or more of eight issues seen as important to courts: form - filling — making court documents more accessible to litigants in person; order drafting — creating orders that are more likely to be accepted by courts; continuous online hearing — challenging the question of whether a court is a place or a service; argument - building — to aid non-lawyers in creating well - structured arguments, distinguishing fact from law; outcome prediction — using technology to answer the natural question «what are my chances of winning?»

In any event, any court proceedings in the criminal jurisdiction can be adjourned if a third party decides to challenge the court's ruling to issue a witness summons by way of juridical review (see R (on the application of Cunliffe) v West London Magistrate's Court [2006] EWHC 2081In any event, any court proceedings in the criminal jurisdiction can be adjourned if a third party decides to challenge the court's ruling to issue a witness summons by way of juridical review (see R (on the application of Cunliffe) v West London Magistrate's Court [2006] EWHC 2court proceedings in the criminal jurisdiction can be adjourned if a third party decides to challenge the court's ruling to issue a witness summons by way of juridical review (see R (on the application of Cunliffe) v West London Magistrate's Court [2006] EWHC 2081in the criminal jurisdiction can be adjourned if a third party decides to challenge the court's ruling to issue a witness summons by way of juridical review (see R (on the application of Cunliffe) v West London Magistrate's Court [2006] EWHC 2court's ruling to issue a witness summons by way of juridical review (see R (on the application of Cunliffe) v West London Magistrate's Court [2006] EWHC 2Court [2006] EWHC 2081).

Paul Gilbert asks His Honour Judge Wall QC to what extent he sees a court being bound by what's in the primer, potentially then taking away the ability of an expert to challenge issues in the primer.

There has not been a significant human rights challenge to a random testing policy since Irving Pulp (which was not a human rights complaint), and it will be interesting to see whether the Supreme Court's dim view of random testing in a unionized workplace will influence the treatment of such policies in a non-union environment.

In the event that Mr. Roberts, rather than Zoomermedia, had challenged the enforceability of the same provision, it is quite likely that the Court would have found the clause to be void (see for instance, the Court of Appeal's ruling in the recent case of Wood v. Fred Deeley Imports LtdIn the event that Mr. Roberts, rather than Zoomermedia, had challenged the enforceability of the same provision, it is quite likely that the Court would have found the clause to be void (see for instance, the Court of Appeal's ruling in the recent case of Wood v. Fred Deeley Imports Ltdin the recent case of Wood v. Fred Deeley Imports Ltd..

Eugene Meehan, Q.C. is quoted in the Canadian Lawyer & Law Times Blog as saying: «This decision is a potential constitutional game changer, going forward, we could see more division of power and jurisdiction - based cases being challenged in the courts.»

But in terms of the criminal prohibition I see the Charter challenge as a slam dunk — provided the court sticks to existing principles.

The majority is right that there can not be a Rule of Law if people can not assert their rights in court, and that «[i] f people can not challenge government actions in court, individuals can not hold the state to account — the government will be, or be seen to be, above the law» (par.

For those who joined the ODR conference in The Hague in May 2016 and saw the trend report we wrote (ODR and the Courts: the challenge of 100 % access to justice), it is probably no surprise that the necessary cooperation processes did not materialise.

In recent cases handed down by the Indiana Supreme Court (Bennett v. Richmond, 960 N.E. 2d 782 (Ind. 2012); Person v. Shipley, 962 N.E. 2d 1192 (Ind. 2012)-RRB-, we see challenges to expert testimony that went too far with arguments for more stringent requirements than are required under IRE 702.

And we see that from our users when they are interested in understanding how PTAB plays a role in any of their strategies whether patents have been challenged at PTAB versus District Court, etc..

In 2015 and 2016, we had the privilege of representing Heiltsuk First Nation and Kitasoo / Xai» xais First Nation during a judicial review before the Federal Court of Appeal, and successfully challenged the certification of the Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipeline: see our blog article here.

On 10 December 2015, the General Court of the European Union (GC) rendered a judgment in the Council v. Front Polisario case that was revolutionary in many regards: not only did a national liberalization movement successfully challenge an EU trade agreement, the Court also considered the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights (CFR) applicable to non-EU citizens on a non EU - territory and in the context of trade policies (see previously, Geraldo Vidigal in EJILTalk).

The clash of the acts is being challenged in court, and Hughes hopes to see the Employment Standards Act modified.

His sheer dedication enabled him to become one of the youngest to be designated by the Supreme Court and thus saw him take on challenging and pinnacle cases that India would not forget and evidently so, as Gopal was honoured with the National Law Day Award for Outstanding Jurist, in 2009 by the President of India, for his consistent professional excellence and adherence to the highest traditions of the Bar.

We have been less accustomed in Britain to dwell on the relationship of law and politics but we are seeing in public reaction (or at any rate the reaction of sections of the media) to the current litigation over the triggering of Brexit that the traditional detachment of our own courts from the political battleground is not immune from challenge.

His approach was somewhat less subtle than the challenge posed by the Supreme Court itself in R v Horncastle (see «Making a Point», NLJ 29 January 2010, p 120).

I've seen what happens to many of these people in court, when they stand up and try to explain to the judge how they are «Mennonites» who can't be found guilty under the Constitution because it's a violation of their rights dating back centuries before America existed, or when they challenge the judge's right to preside over their case because of some arcane law, or that red light cameras are unconstitutional because they do not get to confront their accusers, again, I cringe, because I know what's coming.

In the so - called Betamax case, which saw Universal City Studios challenge Sony in 1983 - 84, the US Supreme Court ruled that copying from TV onto video cassette constituted fair use, and was thus permitteIn the so - called Betamax case, which saw Universal City Studios challenge Sony in 1983 - 84, the US Supreme Court ruled that copying from TV onto video cassette constituted fair use, and was thus permittein 1983 - 84, the US Supreme Court ruled that copying from TV onto video cassette constituted fair use, and was thus permitted.

But as CoinDesk subsequently reported, exchanges in that country are eyeing a legal challenge that could see the dispute argued before India's highest court.

We were disappointed to see hard - fought patent reform derailed by political dealings, but have seen a Supreme Court ruling in Alice v. CLS Bank used to challenge some of the lowest - quality software patents.

If someone feels wronged by CREA, he / she / they have every right to do as they see fit to challenge CREA; CREA has every right to defend its» actions... in court.