Also, things are the way they are — setting aside the politics (for recieving nations) and psychological costs (for those moving), it would make sense to some extent for people to move toward places set up for efficient wealth generation rather than to spread the wealth among the people whereever they are, so it wouldn't make sense to try to wipe the slate clean of the advantages gained from history let along geography, although the later does bring up the issue of
climate change refugees, and some wealth generating capacity is spread out (land), and of course some clean energy resources are rather abundant in the developing world or parts thereof, and energy needs differ geographically even for the same lifestyle —
see above... this whole paragraph should reference itself....
The idea that
climate change is causing migration and displacement is entering the mainstream, but experts have warned against using the term «
climate refugees» to describe what we're
seeing in small islands, coastal regions, and even conflict zones like Syria.