Sentences with phrase «seeing objects with»

From there, the fibers spread out like a sheet, connecting brain regions that are important for seeing objects with other brain regions that coordinate which objects to focus attention upon.

Not exact matches

It cites numerous instances in which chickens were forcefully hit over the head with various objects, including a metal scraper tool and a broomstick, and details how they mishandled the hens by «roughly grabbing them by a single wing and violently shoving them into garbage cans» — which can be seen in the video.

With Bixby Vision, users can learn details about objects and locations, find out how to purchase items they see in the real world, and translate languages, among many other tasks.

The Detroit Institute of Arts is also experimenting with augmented reality technology and is partnering with Google for an Ancient Egypt exhibit in which visitors can use the museum's smartphones to see special digital graphics and information overlaid on certain objects, like a mummy's sarcophagus.

People object to a system that they see as being dominated by big pharma, a system that intrusively asserts control over our lives, telling us what's wrong with us, and telling us what we must do in order to get better (as they choose to define «better»).

And you can see we could do the localization, object detection and tracking [with just the lidar].

Let's see, hmmm, even if I didn't have to pay for it or the cleaning of it with my tax dollars, I would object to any monument to any religion being placed in a public space that I pay to keep clear for my and others use.

See John 12:4 - 6, for example: «But one of his disciples, Judas Iscariot, who was later to betray him, objected [to Mary anointing Jesus with expensive perfume], «Why wasn't this perfume sold and the money given to the poor?

Also, as I'm wrapping up my doctorate in astrobiology, I will spend a great deal looking at objects I can't see with my physical eye while peering off light years into the galaxy in search of life.

(1) The concrete universal as the individual seen in conjunction with the thought structure implied in it, that which makes it an intelligible unity, is neither a naively conceived sense - object, nor an abstract logical universal.

He then utilized terminology that for decades informed the basic stance of process theology on the nature of true power, though, as we shall see, that is open to challenge: God «persuades the world by an act of suffering with the kind of power which leaves its object free to respond in humility and love.»

What I «see» are physical, tangible objects in my world which I interact with.

Now, with that in view — which I think is a reasonable objection to a document which wants to be seen as, above all things, «reasonable» — why would I object to the whole thing as «obscuring the Gospel»?

For Reid it is by a «natural kind of magic» that we take them to stand for these objects; there are no grounds in experience for making this association.9 As we have seen, Whitehead disagrees with Reid in that he holds that we have a direct intuition or «feeling» of external objects as causes of sensations.

His solution was the disengaged form, but with that the form of the object becomes abstract — not in the sense that it is grasped as an abstract essence but insofar as it no longer remains the form of that individual — and this is the problem that Whitehead saw and tried to solve.

For example, apes have extreme difficulty with photo - object matching and with seeing the relationship between a TV picture of a space and the real space, or between a dollhouse model of a room and the real room (MA 99 - 108).

In entering into relation with its mother the child completes this distance, and it is only later when he ceases to enter into relation that he sees her as an object and falls into the I - It's shaping and elaboration of the distance.

On reflection we can see that the above argument for the internal relatedness of God as cognitive subject presupposes that there are alternative possibilities for God, at least with respect to what creatures, or what states of creatures, He has as objects of knowledge.

The wordless counting involves two capacities, the first being «seeing numbers» or choosing the object with a certain number of points on it from among a group of objects with points differing in number, size, color and arrangement.

I can not see that it is.12 Why should we suppose that a deity with unrealized potentialities and contingent properties, and qualified by His cognitive relations with contingent objects, must be in relation with some world of entities other than Himself?

But if I'm honest with myself, I have to admit that I do tend to see a woman first as a sex object — I look her up and down, and if she doesn't appeal I classify her as mannish, or domineering, or plain, or old.

Galileo saw a swinging pendulum as an object with inertia, which almost repeats its oscillating motion; his predecessors, inheriting the Aristotelian interest in progress towards — final ends, had seen a pendulum as a constrained falling object, which slowly attains its final state of rest.

It is when i see religious people try to tell me that i m not good with out god, with no evidence that I object and speak up.

In this second case we are actually dealing with images: objects that can be seen and that always involve a visible representation.

Rather than being seen as a subject with its own set of rights, the child has become an object whose parents get to determine which set of rights it has.

Like a child growing board with a new toy sees another shiny object.

He concludes that the Council has been «perhaps in a way never before seen in the history of the Church, the object of the most disparate hermeneutics and judgments of the most varied kind... rupture with the Church... and with theology» (p. 421).

But given their unification in this manner, along with the guiding interest in numbering the objects concerned, the totality of objects does in fact appear to us as one intuitive whole in which the unifying relations («collective combinations») may be seen to be exactly what they are.

But at present psychologists are tending, first, to admit that the actual unit is more probably the total mental state, the entire wave of consciousness or field of objects present to the thought at any time; and, second, to see that it is impossible to outline this wave, this field, with any definiteness.

Natural objects were glorified, my spiritual vision was so clarified that I saw beauty in every material object in the universe, the woods were vocal with heavenly music; my soul exulted in the love of God, and I wanted everybody to share in my joy.»

It may be readily seen that Lango's interpretation leans heavily upon a consistent usage of «realization» in these passages that is taken as univocally synonymous for «ingression,» along with the further assumption that ingression is a doctrine that only deals with the admission of eternal objects into actuality in some one given way.

If atheists want to identify with her and lay claim to her then I see no reason to object.

But precisely, with this talk of «eternal objects,» as Whitehead clearly sees, we abstract completely from the process, from the unalterable uniqueness of felt occasions, and from the singularity of the occasion in the act of feeling.

One advantage that a broader duration will have over the briefer durations with which it is contemporaneous is its capacity to sum up successive briefer duration; making them simultaneous.22 We have already seen that this is Bergson's explanation of the manner in which the successive «vibrations» of objects around us are transformed by us into stable, unchanging surfaces.

We viewed all the treasures of the castle chapel, and saw the armoury, and just about every precious object with which his truly royal and extraordinary famous castle sparkles.»

For in the later work, where a full - scale «metaphysical synthesis» is attempted, Bradley's reconciling concept of feeling is now resorted to as an expression of the «togetherness of entities in the world, i.e., with Bradley, Whitehead does not see experience primarily as a matter of the cognition of objects.

Anyways, sometimes I feel like he is actually a human child in disguise because he literally keeps us up all night with his shenanigans and we have to take shifts getting out of bed in the middle of the night to see what thing he has just knocked over, or what loud object he is racing across the floor.

Basically, the object is to see who can score the most amount of points with the most efficiency.

Even though Smith is the smaller guy, I kept getting this crazy visual as I watched Smith run that fade route over and over, seeing White doing everything short of hitting Smith with a foreign object, WWE style, to try to prevent him from catching the ball.

But, unfortunately for the former Lille defender, Bellerín has proven to be an immovable object on the team - sheet, with the Frenchman, who has an average pass accuracy of 74 % in the league this season, having seen his game time severely restricted of late.

With that said, there are probably other areas seen as more important, though few would object to picking him up.

There is openness to seeing computational objects as «other minds»; there is willingness to consider what a computer and a human mind might have in common; and, in a different register, there is evidence of a certain fatigue with the difficulties of dealing with people.

Babies would like to play objects with different colors since he / she can already see the colors vividly.

As time goes on, you start saying «One, Two, THREE» as you point to three objects to help them see that those words associate with counting and they will join you eventually.

The baby won't be able to see color differences until they are one month old — about the same age a baby starts being able to track a moving object with their eyes.

Your baby can't see very far yet, so play games with him by holding objects that are brightly colored or high - contrast near his face.

Then invite the children to play with the objects, creating or playing with them as they see fit.

You will also see her begin to use her thumb to help when picking up smaller objects, and she can carry objects along with her as she crawls.

They do have a pretty nifty feature called «blind spot monitoring system» that detects objects in your blind spots with a cue light in the mirrors (and a chime if you have the signal light on towards that blind spot) but depending on that, or any system in lieu of actually being able to see if you are clear seems dubious to me.

Pause on objects and talk to or with your child about what she's seeing.