Sentences with phrase «seeing opinions of people»

Not exact matches

You can still go back and you can look on the Zillow blog and see posts that I wrote, and Stan, who by this point had become our chief economist, wrote about how it was obvious, in our opinion, that housing was going to crash and that it was built on the foundation of sand and there was too much easy credit that had allowed people to buy homes who really couldn't afford them.

I got some of the best feedback on my personal style, which I'll share with you: it was to be more playful, to see the humour in things and to see the humour in other people having different opinions to yourself.

Some believe that this has led to the creation of echo chambers that accentuate the views and opinions people want to see, while dampening those that they disagree with.

There are many opinions that arise regard cryptocurrencies, while a group of people consider that they are just a bubble, or a way for criminals to launder their money, that is simply a bet that has no value or guarantee whatsoever, there is another group of people who see cryptocurrencies in another way and they are convinced that these are the solution to many of the problems that exist today.

I have been in the markets for a long time, seen a lot of experts, analysts and brokers, so I must confess that my opinion of these people is one of ambivalence.

Atheists: I know many there are many people that practice religion just by fanaticism, I've seen many people in my opinion stupid (excuse the word) praying to saints hopping to solve their problems by repeating pre-made sentences over and over, but there are others different, I don't think Religion and Science need to be opposites, I believe in God, I'm Catholic and I have many reasons to believe in him, I don't think however that we should pray instead of looking for the cause and applying a solution, Atheists think they are smart because they focus on Science and technology instead of putting their faith in a God, I don't think God will solve our problems, i think he gave us the means to solve them by ourselves that's were God is, also I think that God created everything but not as a Magical thing but stablishing certain rules like Physics and Quimics etc. he's not an idiot and he knew how to make it so everything was on balance, he's the Scientist of Scientist the Mathematic of Mathematics, the Physician of Physicians, from the tiny little fact that a mosquito, an insect species needs to feed from blood from a completely different species, who created the mosquitos that way?

You will notice that you won't see these same level of oppositions against any other belief system, where people who hold the worldly opinion would be so motivated and compelled as to try and convince believers that their faith is wrong.

Most of the righteous people I see are agnostics and atheists; most of the unrighteous people I see are those who claim their god is going to punish and burn people who don't have the same non-provable OPINIONS as they do.

Some people just are not happy unless you see it «their» way, not respecting personal standards or opinions of others.

All groups protest and voice their opinions and to a person outside of the group, they will mostly see it as whining.

I can see tat a lot of people that don't like that I disagree with the article dismissed my earlier opinion as hate, I certainly don't have as much experience in hate as this people that read about it very often in their sacred books.

But it also represents a tactic we're likely to see more of: claims of old - fashioned Catholicism, used by people who are far from old - fashioned Catholics, to maintain control of officially Catholic institutions and to ban the people whose political opinions they don't like.

I think I'm too simple in my thinking that; if you don't like it, DO N'T WATCH... if you don't agree with it, DO N'T CHOOSE TO LIVE YOUR LIFE THAT WAY... Seems like a very simplistic way of thinking, but I have personal opinions on EVERYTHING, but I don't force others to live their lives according to my moral fiber... i don't judge people for living their lives the way that makes them happy... And i believe that IGNORANCE is the basis for INTOLERANCE... people are famous for HATING things that they don't understand... again, if it MORALLY offends you, don't read stories on things that you don't agree with, don't watch shows that portray choices that you don't agree with... The Brown family seems close knit, almost like extended family living under one roof... the kids work together and get along much better than a lot of «mainstream» households i see...

We might consider getting the opinions of a few godly people who are not part of the issue who can stand back and see things from a fresh perspective.

Part of persuasive argument must (in my opinion) include discussing our presuppositions with one another as part of the debate around context so that people see where we are coming from.

As we have seen, Father Maillard is of the opinion that there can be no encounter with God except through the person of the other; and he adds that the idea of a personal, transcendent God is untenable.

Perhaps just not the same fields of study» Second — if one can't see these questions as an exercise in thought and rationale then that person has failed the test... placing opinion in the mix as to thwart the morons is just another test to see truly how moronic people can be!

Not to mention most people who beleive in a certain religion shove their opinions down the throats of others, i've seen it time and time again.

@PUZZLED — well see my issus lies with the fact of how women were treated in ancient times — they were property and so allowing them to go thru all the emotionals and physicals of carrying and then giving birth only to toss it off a cliff isn't what i'd call good parenting — having an abortion for many people who should NEVER have kids is (in my opinion) good parenting!

Christians are always faced with the temptation to overrate the opinion of other human beings, and to try to be pleasing to other people, to the peril of their relationship with God (see John 5:44, Gal.

The image of him changed because as stories are told if you're not around to see the person, you from your own opinion of how they look.

We shall see how important the creeds and other summaries of belief have been to many Christians, who have unchurched those with whom they disagreed and at times persecuted people whose opinions were regarded as unorthodox, whom they called heretics.

He might disagree with an idea, an opinion, a method, or an ideology, but I have not seen him «rough up» the spirit of people here.

Because the people of faith see logic in creation and see the hand of God in nature, and the athiest see the carbon dating and recent research as valuable... doesn't justify what Bill Nye said... he was not just expressing his opinion... he was taking the next step of a public figure looking to SILENCE those of faith and to interfere with the family's rights and trust.

It's nice to see some shift in the opinion of some Christian people here in America but I've said it before and I'll say it again, Gay people don't necessarily want the church to recognize the wedded union.

JWT, this your opinion to have, I applaud you, but I will continue to support the righteousness of YHWH, and according to Him this is for all people in the world in Isaiah 56, whether you see it or not, or want it or not, ok that is your choice.

I see more love in the movie King Kong, by an ape, and animals period, than in most of you people on this site, and on this earth with all of your bias man made laws, and religions, honestly in my opinion, I do.

But, that's just my opinion; Perhaps some people aren't capable of listening as they read, in which case I can see the importance of proper grammar even when ranting.

That is not to say there shouldn't be Christian or other religious values present but it is to say that people shouldn't be conned and public opinion shouldn't be manipulated by claims of righteous values — as we have seen, it is just too easy to fake and sway people to support what may not be in their best interests based on having a cloak of religion.

secondly he was not the only one in the church who was a «non believer» many others do not «believe» as well as myself and yet non of us saw a problem with something that was being done out of respect and unison for the majority not for just one person opinion, and last, no one ever said he «had» to pray the only command was to bow your head and stare at the ground counting how many toes you had for all we carried, do what you want if choose not to pray but just bow your head in uniformity not cry about it blow it up and change the way events happen — if you have and complaints or questions please FEEL FREE to contact me [email protected]

Without going into specifics on a number of allegations that emerged with the U.S. cables, the Holy See Press Office said that the reports «reflect the perceptions and opinions of the people who wrote them and can not be considered as expressions of the Holy See itself.»

But I also believe it is important and even required by charity to permit all voices an audience and to see all people and opinions as typical of a diverse community striving towards love and health.

I agree, sounds like she saw a market to make some money and randomly picked a side to go with and then misquoted and misinterperted the written facts and stamped her opinion on it to facilitate that specific group of people.

It is preferable, in my opinion, to see that they were all preaching one gospel, which centers on the message and mission of Jesus, but each person simply presented different aspects or truths of the one gospel.

Although many will suggest that Robson has a personal vendetta of sorts aimed squarely at the Grinch who stole soccer, that doesn't make his words any less truthful... such tactics are nothing new... in the U.S.this business practice has become so common that even the players regularly use the media to manipulate public opinion (LeBron James did likewise to rally public support for himself and away from his teammate, Kyrie Irving, who has asked to be traded)... whether for contract leverage or to rally support for or against certain players, this strategy can be incredibly effective at times, but when it misses the mark it can be dangerously divisive... for a close - to - the - vest team like Arsenal to use such nefarious means to manufacture a wedge between the fans and it's best player (again), is absolutely despicable... for the sanctimonious higher - ups who demand that it's players adhere to a certain protocol regarding information deemed «in house» or else to intentionally spread «fake» news or to provide certain outlets with privileged information for such purposes is pretty low indeed... no moral high ground here, just a big club pretending to be a small club so that they can continue to pull the wool over the eyes of a dedicated, albeit somewhat naive, fan base... so not only does this club no give a shit about it's fans, this clearly shows that clubs primary interests aren't even soccer related... for all intent and purposes Kroenke doesn't care if we're a soccer club or a tampon factory as long as we continue to maximized his investment... stay woke people... great to see more and more people commenting on the state of the franchise... this club needs to be held accountable for it's actions

The number you see is the average difference between a person's opinion of a team and the poll's opinion.

I've seen a lot of Celtic «stuff» over the years with many many players — but still just one person's opinion who has an old school BB bias of points in the paint and defense, defense defense.

My main argument is that people who work close with him see something special in him, i'm basing this on countless interviews, other players opinions and my general analysis of qualities he shows while on the pitch.

My opinions are formed by what I see of the players on film, and what's coming from people that get paid to live, eat, and breathe this stuff every day of their lives.

I see a lot of garbage written on here which I ignore, as everyone has an opinion, but when people thumb down a FACT, it shows what morons they are.

I see more AOB posts when compared to AKB though, these are posts made by people who was willing to share them and hope to add a thought to fellow Arsenal fans... well at least I think K seems to be pure Anti-Wenger and refuses to read anything other than what follows his opinion and that bugs me BUT isn't that evidence that Admin isn't sucking the cream out of Wengers «eclair»?

He has strong opinions about the «platforms» of each NFL player and each person placed into any position where they can be often seen and heard --- and the responsibility that comes with it to instruct, to inspire, to give.

These are very important questions because when things go wrong on the field of play and we (fans and pundits) formulate our opinions — we do so through the prism of what we see on the field of play — the performance of the players and the manager — and largely ignore the role and activities of the money making people who behind the scenes play a huge part in determining what happens on the pitch.

Personally, I welcome — this being a debate site - real people with real fan opinions and have no intention of saying less than I mean, since to me that is hypocritical at worst or sitting on the fence at best, in true Alan Smith style (as opposed to fine proper and honest, as they see it, pundits like NEVILLE, CARRAGHER AND SOUNESS, who are above all honest and earn their corn - unlike Walcott - by doing the job they are paid to do.)

It will be interesting to see what he will do about the right wing next season, i believe he will play Walcott and even when some people here where saying how Theo has no future, i was always of the opinion that Theo would be sure starter soon as he regains fitness.

yep and @ozgunner and @rkw i do nt see why it angers and agitates you so much when i insult fans who abuse wenger, look i am not the kind of naive guy who thinks everybody should be nice to eachother of course that would be nice, but when i hate some opinions of some people i do get annoyed a lot of times and i do show it and its truth i am not a supporter of the belief that one has to respect all opinions equally because i am firm believer that there are dump opinions for example when a conservative talks about homophob things i am pretty sure that i will insult him and some will say its wrong and will say its right its your opinion but back to your point..

Immediately i saw TW14 at the back of your name i realized, it's either you are theo's Agent or his Uncle, no wonder you are been thumbed down, it's people / fans like you that makes Arsene and the board think first 4 is a trophy, i am sure in your opinion you feel TW14 is the best striker in EPL and we don't need to buy players like Mahrez, casette, cause he's better than they are

Some people seemed to be of the opinion that I don't like Toure or would like to see him go.

It's me and you Matte must be the Sun, never mind we can sit back and watch it happen, Sorry lads I would sooner watch those flicks and going past people even if the final ball fails then watch players with 5 year contracts chase the ball all over the pitch and then win it only to pass it straight to the other team, If Noble was worth his contract Rav was worth another 2 year contract just to see if a Newman could bring the best out of him, Just an old expats opinion (haven't had a drink yet)

No, you're not being too blase in my opinion; but I've seen a few message boards etc. light up over the past couple of days with people going «Oh!