Sentences with phrase «seeing your style change»

I love seeing your illustrations every week and seeing your style change and improve!

Not exact matches

TiOKé Staffing & amp; lt; / div & amp; gt; & amp; lt; div & amp; gt; Our (Amadeusz Topka & amp; amp; amp; Faisal Afzal) Company's New Year Resolution is to start on changing the current Car Freshener market and expand it towards new heights by providing a product which includes style and fine fragrance whether you are driving in a sedan... See MoreFaisal Afzal & amp; lt; / div & amp; gt; & amp; lt; div & amp; gt; «@smbizdoitbetter: What is your businesses New Year's Resolution?

The result is a shift in overall leadership styles, where executives now want to see hard numbers before they'll sign off on changes.

In your time as commandant, what kind of changes have you seen in your own management style, your own approach to leadership of the force?

The fact of the matter is when you talk about central banks, you're talking about powerful institutions rooted in their own management styles and tradition (even if the latter has just now seen a very unusual break) and it's not likely that one person can radically change things, even if he or she wanted to.

This may be because before, they tolerated a more dictatorial management style, but now they've realized that they have nothing to lose by challenging you, in the hopes that they will see changes.»

It also adapts, so if a publisher sees its traffic plummet, it can recover its ranking by changing its headline style.

Building on our 2015 decision to not sell modern sporting rifles, we announced important changes today: - Raising the age for purchase of firearms and ammunition from 18 to 21 years old - Removing online items resembling assault - style rifles See details https://t.co/K7wnc0XEwK

Mainline leaders see the overseas - mission - oriented evangelicals as unwilling or unable to accept a radically changed situation, as clinging to an «old style» of mission activity, closely associated with a now discredited imperialism.

«Instead of attracting a younger, more open - minded demographic with these changes,» Douthat wrote, «the Episcopal Church's dying has proceeded apace... Practically every denomination — Methodist, Lutheran, Presbyterian — that has tried to adapt itself to contemporary liberal values has seen an Episcopal - style plunge in church attendance.

Down to the lowest levels of matter, if we may so style them, this capacity for and presence of change and development is to be seen.

I recently committed to the «Paleo» style of eating and I got ta say I've been super excited to see all the changes my body has gone through.

I used to be a giroud hater but from what I saw yesterday I changed my mind he suits our style of play -LCB- I apologise) now my concern is injuries we had no options in bench, Jack is a white diaby even the way he puts his body into challenges he will always be injured.Seems cech is the real deal though

Even if they're healthy next year, I just don't see them doing much better than this because Thibs can't be bothered to change anything about his style / system that isn't working.

For all the beautiful plays that we love to see; when you lead sit back a bit deeper and go from there (we don't ask for a complete change of style, just caution).

Can anyone exactly see Wenger changing his stagnated style of play, next season?

Nothing stays the same, though, and football over the years has seen any number of tactical changes, so I wonder if we are now coming to the end of tiki - taka in favour of a more athletic, robust and high pressing style of football.

Our style has changed to the worst, but like this i can see us win something big this year, with one signing or 2.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

I think we need a change of system we hve been found out all other teams also analyse our games our manager is poor tactically lets change the style of our game ul see how we win

you wont see a cazorla or a xavi losing possession, not only that but they drive the team forward.but unfortunately u hav players like ramsey, who do nt drive the attack like the above two, also he loses possessions sometimes by attempting fancy moves.its sad ramsey gives more importance to style over substance.unfortunately, i feel players like ramsey hav contributed to arsenal's inability... imagine a team like barcelona playing with him, constantly losing posession leading to conceding goals and so on.difference is barca's manager wud take them out, while under wenger u r rewarded with the nxt game!!!! i do nt deny he was top notch a season or two back, but now hes a liability imo and need to change his mentality.even that opportunity he got against tottenham where thought longer before taking a shot thus giving defender time to get to him and take off the ball.i bet if it was cazorla, arsenal wud hav scored...

I remember some of you posted pics of our midfield and praised ev some drew comparison with lucho, ev has a style that is very similar to the Barca way, but he loves defensive stability and because we lack the true Barca MF to do it we are like this, we all agree some players must go, but carefully looking at things you see that most of what ev does was done by pep (of course not as boldly) but his style looks ugly and boring, guys let us give him a chance it hurts but let us do it, let us see the big picture, he may not be capable of beautiful football but at least while we build we are confident of results which we need, when we rebuild then let us fire him, but if this is down to the players then we are making a mistake, I am not asking anyone to change but just stop insulting and criticising ev, patience is the key.

The manager is clueless, we heard how it was the players who actually changed the style of play for the City game, now we see Wenger's style of play back and once again it isn't working.

However, it's still not enough to make Vidic's point any less valid, and so it remains to be seen whether or not the pattern changes in the coming years or if his management style continues to keep the trend going.

I really feel for him.He was treated without respect I remember saying here that our season also depended on him because we knew Welbeck and Giroud were not good enough.However, he came and didn't really impress in the CF role but impressed on the wing but I felt he would've done very well in the Ozil role earlier in the season.He used to be an AMF for Deportivo but they changed him to a CF.This is why I believe he shouldn't have been signed in the first place.It was poor business from Arsenal to sign him because we needed a typical killer CF.Lucas is a more of a No. 10 style kind of player as he played there for Deportivo prior to the season where he played CF.If you look at his style of play you can see that he's not your typical CF.think Wenger benched him because he didn't solve our CF problem but I guess it's not Lucas» fault.

Captain Matt Hellmich led a crew of 12 into the Gym on Wednesday and it was really fun to see these guys do hockey - style line changes to stay fresh every few minutes.

I don't see how two mediocre wrs changes the fact we need to finally hit on at least one game changer at wr early and our history shows we can find oline late lall we have to do is look at what Rd Wagner and Alex Lewis we're drafted but if they are cool with getting left in the past with this pre historic style of offense than we will continue to be mediocre

Do your reaserch and see Allegri would be perfect Simeoni is to much of a change in style Allegri tactically is the best around.

Giroud still is part of the arsenal and he is of massive importance to the squad, es arsenal have gotten the type of striker we like to see, but there will be games we have to change style and it will be important for different forwards to be available.

The thing is we often play sides like Watford so that style gets seen as our norm, we rarely face three contrasting opponents in quick succession so the tactical changes are never as evident.

I feel we needed so much of Houllier's approach at the time, mainly the behind - the - scenes sports science changes, but I wouldn't like to see us revert back to such a style of football again.

I watched both games on TV and saw no change in formation or style of play and once again, Diame is thrown out on the right where he is virtually ineffective!

We all knew we wouldn't get anything from this game.The venue tight ground, in London, more importantly the effect of the Norwich result.It seems to me now that our season could be determined by one player.Benik Afobe.He showed enough to warrant a start, Reading would be a great platform.We desperately need him to show the quality we know he has.With the predicted further 3 loses to come, this is going down to the wire.NES attitude has always been about his team, the system, style with little regard to the opposition, so it's too late for change, we have to carry on and hope that it will be enough.I saw a great tactic used in Spain, that would suit Costa or Cavellerio, who get frequently caught offside.That is for one of them to stay offside, as long as they are not involved in the first phase of play, then they are brought into the 2nd phase, with defenders tracking back, they have the advantage.Mind you it was Barcelona and Messi!!

Mourinho reportedly wrote a six - page letter to United last week insisting that he can adhere to their traditional attacking style of play, and if he can change his brand, we reckon Gill would like to see a change, even though he has raised doubts about the former Chelsea boss in the past.

Injuries have played a part, as has the managerial change that saw Brendan Rodgers replaced by Jürgen Klopp in October while the club's style of play also hasn't got the best out of him.

This change saw the wingers switch sides to compliment the substitutes style of play.

Moving Ayew up front would mean a change in style and clearly Bilić does not see him as the solution given he has used Fletcher up front on his own this term despite a lack of experience.

As I mentionned above that ive just watched all the Arsenal game 2007 and 2008, Ive personnaly gave up with this idea of strngthenin our defence.Its obvious, we need CDM, and I strongly recommend Toure for that job, but finally, I found out our main PBM: AW is a man who beleives in: THE BEST DEFENCE IS ATTACKIN.He has built the team that way.When I watched our 2007 games, i could see that most of these teams who has defeated us this season played exactly the same style of game last season but they couldnt perform so much as our attackin side were so strong for them so that they were always held at their own defensive side.The game is completely Psycological.At the 1st 10mn of the game, they try to attack @their best, but just when we start attackin then all their mdlfldr start to pull back coz most of our attack are all dangerous.And this is what makes the diffrence between the so called BIG 4 and the rest of the league.The Pbm isnt really that our defence is so weak, It is our attack which is WEAK.Durin the first half of this season, Our guys couldnt perform any attackin strategy planned by AW, coz 1st: they were new to it, coz they have only practiced it durin trainin session.2 nd: Some of the key players are gone.3 rd: Even AW did nt know where exactly is the best position for those new players, the likes of Nasri, Vela, and some of them were all subsitute last year.Plus they are all young players who can improve and change their style game after game.

Parenting styles have changed over time and several factors can be attributed to the change we see from our time as...

The other main style of combo that you will see is a removable changing table that lies over the top of the crib.

I consider myself an «Attachment Parenting» - style parent, and I couldn't see how I could ever change this nursing to sleep pattern without completely traumatizing my daughter, so I was so grateful when Michelle helped us create a very gentle plan that has totally worked!

So, some of the cloth diapers today, that you will see, they close with snaps or Velcro and then as far as between 10 years ago and now, what you are seeing is, the styles are changing, ever so little, year to year, but there does seem to be slight improvement, so improvements on how elastic works around the legs and better containment and even some different kinds of absorbing fabrics.

Lots of influential people have economical and geopolitical interests to see regime change in Syria, Libya style.

... «In such a complex moment, however, to limit ourselves to seeing always and everywhere only the actions of the [international] powers would be «70s style old fashioned anti-imperialism which refuses to recognise the changes in course now for decades, amongst them the slow but inevitable decline of the USA.»

What's shocking is how much our political culture has changed in just 60 years — the producers of this film lived in a country that had just seen REAL despotism in the form of Nazi Germany and a military - ruled Japan (note the brownshirt - style uniforms, and also the lack of any of any depiction of their Soviet equivalents), and they pull few punches about what leads a society away from freedom.

She understands the pressure to publish and the worry that changing teaching methods takes time; however, people who use a lecture - based teaching style are often convinced to change when they see evidence from their own classes, she says.

Cohn sees the same cultural changes driving different styles of graphic storytelling.

Even basic life style change will surely see the woman have some relief before heading to the hospital.

Once you begin to get in this healthy routine and you start seeing change in your body and energy, you will want to increase your workout regiment and begin to add in the other styles and elements that will make your weekly routine truly well rounded.

As you can see — the style, speed and intensity changes on a regular basis — remember you're in control of what you do and when you do it so literally make it up as you go along.