Sentences with phrase «seem as ignorant»

Not exact matches

«By further reflecting that the clearest evidence would be requisite to make any sane man believe in the miracles by which Christianity is supported, — that the more we know of the fixed laws of nature the more incredible, do miracles become, — that the men at that time were ignorant and credulous to a degree almost incomprehensible by us, — that the Gospels can not be proved to have been written simultaneously with the events, — that they differ in many important details, far too important as it seemed to me to be admitted as the usual inaccuracies of eyewitness; — by such reflections as these, which I give not as having the least novelty or value, but as they influenced me, I gradually came to disbelieve in Christianity as a divine revelation.

Seems as man became smarter... the gods and great miracles happened less and less... in fact gods become more obscure as mankind becomes less ignorant.

as i said above, there is an irony here that you are assuming the conservatives are ignorant or unintelligent when you seem so unaware of the available scholarship.

Or perhaps you really are as ignorant as you seem.

It seems to always be this same group getting headlines and making the rest of us enlightened non-believers seem as petty and ignorant as the believers.

Because they didn't have anything to do with those things, just like 99.9 % of Muslims have nothing to do with terror attacks, and are just as victimized by it because ignorant people like you seem to believe all Muslims belong to the same secret club.

Thus, it seems that long ago God knew much less about possibilities than he knows now; by extrapolation, at some time in the past, God must have been «as ignorant as a clam» (PS 12:224).

The bible is a book of made up fictional stories, it's seems hard to believe that a 1000 years later it is still referred to as law by so many ignorant people.

I am daily forced to admire how lamentably ignorant many of our people are that have seemed diligent hearers of me these ten or twelve years, while I spoke as plainly as I was able to speak....

What's this i see here.This site is also in a crisis and that is understating the qualities of our players.I for one will take Walcott over Pedro and i am just responding to a question.I just do nt get it.To me Walcott really is that good and we need him inform.Injuries have hampered his progress a lot as a player but at least i am happy with him.I do not even get why peeps criticize him so badly.To me he should be our starting right winger.We need him because he is a game changer.I just do nt get how he is on the bench.Peeps are so ignorant and will gather whatever facts they can to make him seem average.Talk about the certain 3 musketeers in arsenal lineup but not him.He is a very dangerous player

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

- I also called those who use those claims to be pro-circumcision to be ignorant in the first place, I highly agree that they are foolish reasons, but using those to support your claims makes you seem just as bad as them.

It seems you're backtracking because you may have previously come across as ignorant.

An absence of violence against innocent people would mean there's freedom to trade, but their ignorant bashing of free trade, the failure to mention that great violence as a least one of the sources of today's immense poverty, and their declared need to control the whole world for it to work, seems to say this is nearly exactly like communism.

This might be the only completely untruthful and wholly ignorant statement made in Justin Simien's debut feature Dear White People, which seems far too true - to - life to be called a satire, even though it's billed as such.

Dylan suffers at the hands of funny fat - kid bully Kevin (Julian Dennison), whose actions seem particularly callous given the recent tragic past; Grandpa (Terry Norris) is a randy old codger (wink - wink scenes with Dylan as he skips between bedrooms at the local nursing home are off - putting), who encourages his grandkid's imagination but seems ignorant of the financial strife his grief - stricken family is in.

Directed by Iain Softley, who never met a project he could elevate, The Skeleton Key is more likely just ignorant trash so desperate for twist - hungry jackasses left in the lurch by patron saint Shyamalan that its central promotional campaign seems to involve having Hudson exclaim as often as possible on shows like «Access Hollywood» that the twist ending surprised her.

for the world, which seems To lie before us like a land of dreams, So various, so beautiful, so new, Hath really neither joy, nor love, nor light, Nor certitude, nor peace, nor help for pain; And we are here as on a darkling plain Swept with confused alarms of struggle and flight, Where ignorant armies clash by night.»

To the ignorant viewer, it would seem the simplest thing in the world — an automatic process that could be done by a machine such as Google Translate, or perhaps a sophisticated translation tool.

As you can see that as ignorant as you are for blocking me, nobody seems to like your responses to anythinAs you can see that as ignorant as you are for blocking me, nobody seems to like your responses to anythinas ignorant as you are for blocking me, nobody seems to like your responses to anythinas you are for blocking me, nobody seems to like your responses to anything.

A surprising number of people (even industry pros) seem gleefully ignorant of the fact that the self - marketing expectation is a recent trend and that — whatever the short - term efficiencies and margin bumps it might bring to individual publishers — its long - term effect on the health of the industry as a whole has not yet been properly analyzed.

Cats are actually very likely to wander off at some point in their lives, so it seems as though the larger risk lies in losing the cat itself to an ignorant shelter with rules to destroy all «FIV positive» and no way to differentiate between those who truly are or aren't.

But sometimes when we look at issues such as pet overpopulation or declawing, the magnitude of the forces against us, whether deliberate or simply ignorant, seems overwhelming.

The Wii - mote I'd say made Sony want to pool more resources into the PS2's Wand and then pushed it to come out on PS3 and it's thanks to Wii and Nintendo that Sony wanted to put more emphasis in competing in that market, however I know there's too many fanboys and deluded, ignorant people who don't seem to realize that Sony infact was not «blatantly copying Nintendo» as much as an alarming amount of Nintendo fanboys and casuals seem to believe.

Unbalance that seems to deride and tar the working class as lazy, selfish, needy, ignorant, intolerant, worthless and the cause of all societies problems.

So corrupt and ideologically bankrupt are the Republicans (and in some cases the Democrats), so passive is the press, and so fat and ignorant is the public that the only thing we seem able to do at this point as a nation is sell lies that lead to useless and even harmful activities like proposals to increase offshore drilling.

Also, Jeff Weiss makes valid points that there is a community that addresses such issues as related to the climate system and climate models, although most climate researchers do seem generally ignorant on this topic.

It would be so much harder to call this out as a transparent attempt to accumulate power away from democracy if Figueres didn't seem to be so pig ignorant.

Unfortunately it seems that among large segments of the general «science supporting» population you can get yourself labeled as ignorant, a denier, anti-science, evil, or worse by just noting anything from recent IPCC documents that could be perceived to threaten any of the current «warmest» talking points.

It seems as if keeping science out of policy is designed above all to create an ignorant policy.

People like Danny Hillis, however well intentioned they might be, terrify me as well, even more so than those who are ignorant and scientifically illiterate because they seem to be oblivious to the laws of unintended consequences.

As for the rest, well, the dystopian evidence seems overwhelming indeed, to the point where it might be no stretch at all to say the biggest threat facing America is perhaps not global warming, not perpetual warmongering, not garbage food or low - level radiation or way too much Lindsay Lohan, but a populace far too ignorant to know how to properly manage any of it, much less change it all for the better.

It seems there should be a «too stupid / ignorant to serve as a representative plaintiff» defense.