Sentences with phrase «seem like a fact»

You give your personal opinion and present it to seem like a fact Or what is «obviously clear and straightforward» to you maybe, but you don't really back this up.

Btw, there is an interview of Moses stating his desire to be one and done, so that seems like a fact.

Credit card debt can seem like a fact of life, but carrying high balances on credit cards can be very expensive.

Not exact matches

The ongoing #MeToo and Time's Up movements may make it seem like celebrating IWD is a no - brainer for brands, but in fact, the campaigns against sexual harassment and sexism have raised the bar, says Erin Keeley, CMO at Mono, an ad agency.

So to them the fact that you're 5 minutes old and already in 50 countries seems like a substantial and valuable accomplishment (which they do know would cost them a bundle in their own organization to duplicate) whereas, to your team, it's just a fact of digital life.

While we're programmed to retain information that seems relevant and which we can tie to other facts and sensations we're already storing in our heads, if a piece of data, like a name, is context-less and random there's less for the brain to latch on to.

«Some people still seem to like the fact that they could at least put a tennis court on the property,» Brennan said.

I «m very keen about the fact that a little girl now, watching the news, when they see me and Judy sitting side by side, it will occur to them that that's perfectly normal — that it won't seem like any big breakthrough at all.»

In fact, this is the very thing that a company like Airbnb seems poised to help out with.

Adding $ 26,000 to your interest burden won't seem like a lot if your business is successful but there's no escaping the fact that you are digging the hole deeper and reducing your financial flexibility.

The fact that companies that make products like Marlboro and Camel cigarettes are now paying for campaigns discouraging their use may seem like karmic irony.

It seems like a trivial distinction between plans that are so similar (and similar as well to the proposals put forward by Sen. John Edwards and New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson) that without the obligatory «Paid for by» ¦» at the bottom of the fact sheet you'd be hard - pressed to say which campaign issued which proposal.

A return to Amazon's $ 9.99 price point is a veritable certainty, while the fact that ebook prices rose in general once Apple entered the market seems like a pretty damning fact in general.

What would seem like a logical conclusion — as companies slashed costs and laid off staff, they would turn increasingly to temp solutions until the economy rebounded — was not, in fact, the case.

In fact, having a telecom company like Verizon (VZ) running a publisher like the Huffington Post doesn't just seem unlikely — it seems like a terrible fit for a number of reasons, and there are probably many journalists at both HuffPo and TechCrunch who are fervently hoping that Verizon sees it that way as well.

While every social media guidebook out there urges us to think carefully before we post anything (in fact, UAE telco du initiated a #PostWisely campaign just to promote this rationale), this particular mindset seems to have been overlooked by many of my fellow users of social media - they seem to have gotten rather comfortable with shooting off their mouths on such platforms, much like certain heads of state.

For those who have always been taught that swearing is a moral issue indicating some sort of personal fault, this study (and others like it attesting to the fact that swearing doesn't seem linked with anything too problematic) should be a nudge to reconsider.

In fact, everywhere in Havana, even on the famed Malecón strip, which abuts the Atlantic, the choking smog makes New York's West Side highway seem like a wildflower preserve.

If we include the fact that the perpetrator's two manifestos clearly state a strong personal dislike of the VP of Information Technology (whom the perpetrator referenced as having made specific comments in the past) and the CEO, and specifically names employees that are liked and are doing a good job, then it seems, without a shadow of doubt, to be an open and shut case.

In fact, what seemed like some of the worst times to get into the market turned out to be the best times.

In fact, part of why I like the state crowdfunding alternatives (alternatives to JOBS Act Title III) is that they seem to take more of the approach that people want to back small companies for reasons that are as compelling or more compelling than the prospect of financial return.

While Wells has received some heavy wrist - slapping for getting caught with its pants down, its seems based on the bloated compensation awarded to the CEO and the fact that, based on the true accounting below, Wells doesn't seem to mind continuing to operate with its pants and underwear draped like a pedophile around its ankles.

But, it seems like those skills ARE, in fact, required for rehabbing.

Moreover, crowd - sourcing facts, at least in theory, seems like a more scalable solution to the sheer amount of video YouTube has to deal with.

While a commercial Moon delivery service may seem like a novelty to some, Astrobotic CEO Jim Thornton knows that such a service fills a very real need in the marketplace — in fact, as Thornton explains to Chad Anderson in this week's Space Angels podcast, Astrobotic has over a hundred deals in their pipeline, all awaiting rides to the lunar surface.

In fact, I think denying that Munger's code can seem like a «business religion» is counter-productive.

In fact, it seems very much that you simply like the thought of other people suffering.

Now there are cases where they seem to have been moved because of this issue and I would like to see those dealt with but they are a minority of the cases when you look at that facts.

If it seems like it could happen to a biologist, then next week biologists will say it is a fact regardless of how improbable it is.

I'm just taking this argument to what seems like a ridiculous end but could, in fact, happen without laws defining «man and wife».

It seems to me that the right - wing of this country is more focused on fire and brimstone issues that divide us like gay marriage and abortion just so they can avoid the fact that their primary reason for their economic platform is to feed people's greed.

Don't misunderstand me; some evolutionists (particularly some of the neo-atheists like Richard Dawkins, who argues in his new book people who don't believe in evolution are on the same level as Holocaust deniers) have gone ape over their theory (forgive the pun) to the point that they seem to forget it is a theory, and refer to it as if it is an undeniable scientific fact.

Kind of an odd logic, seems to me, but then again, I explore facts and reality; sounds like you stick to what you're fed.

Seems like an obvious contradiction to me; something that's only supposed to work as an apologetic against problems with the prevailing God model while, in fact, it works equally well against all the positive aspects of that same model.

Sometimes a situation that seems like it's devolved just into complete absurdity requires a radical, absurd response — and that radical, absurd response might in fact be more sensible than even the thing it's responding to.

Haaretz was even quoted in the article above, so seems like a little bit of fact checking is in order.

In fact, since we seem to like lists, here's a list of the positive similarities between the community at my church and the one on nakedpastor:

It seems to me that whenever followers of Christ begin to inadvertently fundamentalize things that are not, in fact, fundamental to the faith (like geocentricism, the church's authority to sell indulgences, the separation of the races, etc.), God allows our environment to challenge us.

In fact, it rather seems like Jesus forbids us to call anyone a «teacher» (Matt 23:10).

That doesn't take away from the fact that it seemed like a lot of the CNN articles at the time were turning conservative in their view.

Reflection or meditatio does not naturally recommend itself to us; as a matter of fact, since most of us are energetic «doers» and high pragmatists, reflection seems like a most unproductive pastime.

At a moment like this when there doesn't seem to be a lot going right — ascendant authoritarianisms throughout the world; lethal violence by ideological fanatics; feckless responses to both from the democracies — it's good to be reminded that things can be different, and in fact were different, not so very long ago.

I'm not making false assumptions, you merely are hateful and like to twist things to make it seem like you're being persecuted when in fact all it is you being told why it is your voice on this matter has little pertinence - it won't change a damn thing.

In fact, in spite of his insisting that most actual occasions are unconscious (and that there is much that is unconscious even in that series of actual occasions which constitute our successive mental states), his talk of their experience or feeling of themselves, the influence of their predecessors, and their subjective immediacy seems pointless unless each of them is supposed to feel its own being, in some genuine sense, however dimly, so that there is a truth as to what - it - is - like - being - it.

Because it doesn't seem to me like you actually want someone to join you in heaven, you seem to get excited by the fact that you'll be able to look down and jeer at those that didn't make it into your special club.

The fact that this false prophet idiot keeps getting followers really astounds me.he picks and chooses which scripture supports his theories like its a buffet restaurant, and he seems to be forgetting some pretty key points that the bible mentions too.Dare I mention that the bible doesn't even mention WHEN in the tribulation the so called rapture occurs?Some believe before, some during and some after..

seems to me like those who research religions in - depth are usually those who are searching for facts, or faith, or something that feels right.

But the fact is, they seem to have a strong grasp of science ant mathematics, just like us.

Without faith, prayer seems like nonsense, but the fact that prayer doesn't solve all of your problems immediately just means that those who pray remain human.

Also the media will usually show this as a clash of Sikhs and make it seem like we are all animals when in fact it is the just fighting back the radicals, so again the media plays to the unfounded fears of the public about Sikhs.