At first, it is going to
seem like a waste of time because every agent will have a «steal» to show you.
It may
seem like a waste of time because people only use the good testimonials but it does give you social proof that there is a group who finds you easy to work with, knowledgeable and capable of working the deal.
Rearranging my year round decor to add more holiday decor just
seems like a waste of time because I have to pull it out and then put it away.
Not exact matches
It is instead probably
because,
like the rest
of the reading world, pastors, theologians and engaged laypersons rarely read poetry — maybe
because it requires a different set
of skills from reading prose, maybe
because these readers choose not to embrace the indirection
of metaphor, and maybe also
because they have read examples
of bad religious poetry that make the whole endeavor
seem like a
waste of time.
So there is a reason for it, it just
seems like a
waste of time to me but that's
because we are always busy right, what I'm I going to do now?
And the more it hurts me, both by
wasting so much
time and energy looking for things or just navigating around the crap in my house or feeling bad about my apartment, or by making me feel
like a failure
because I can't
seem to maintain a system
of keeping things tidy and organized.
At a certain point I started to avoid combat altogether
because I didn't want to
waste the stickers I actually needed and either traverse previous levels to get some stickers again or return to Decalburg a billion
of times in order restock on stickers (This may
seem like it condradicts my previous statement but please keep in mind that this is still not a good thing no matter how you look at it.)
Maybe it is
because I've been swamped with too many great games recently, but Valhalla Knights 3
seems like the biggest
waste of a title in some
time, especially considering how many parts
of the whole could have been great with just a little more effort.
I see problems with: * you have to be an active promoter
of yourself to get articles read * the review process (mainly there is no ability to assess why rejected articles are rejected and the
time wasting because of pedantic comments) * project - based funding and treating research
like consulting (if I can tell you how much a project will cost, then by definition it is not research) * since academia
seems to be drifting towards consulting, researchers start to become underpaid compared to peers in consulting * the focus on the number
of publications weighted by the rank
of the journal * status is based on if you publish in a high - rank journal, «selected» to be a lead author, and so on, and not whether you do good and creative research, good collaborator, good colleague to peers, etc..
Yet, job seekers tend to dislike writing them
because it
seems like a
waste of time.
It's
seems like the jury is divided on that here,
because some people that I've spoken to say it's a
waste of time and money.