Sentences with phrase «seem too»

I added water which makes it seem too liquidy.

Keep on cookin», kind regards Deborah Robertson ps I liked this but my husband didn't seem too thrilled — probably won't make again, but the house still smells wonderful!

If things seem too thick in the end I would add 2 more tablespoons of milk.

I've used this recipe a couple times and it's been great, but the bottoms of my challah bread always seem too crispy or burnt.

Sometimes cheesecake can seem too dense, or too rich, or basically like you're biting into a block of cream cheese (gross).

It will seem too dry at first, but keep processing until it is smooth and no longer crunchy bits of almond remain.

Note # 2: Some pumpkins are more mushy than others and when blended into a puree it might seem TOO watery.

Your blog is a joy, and your recipes, with the careful instructions and photos, have given me the confidence to try things that otherwise would seem too difficult (make a tart?

One thing that I did find made them taste literally epic, was to leave them to fully cool down after cooking and then heat them up again as when you first cook them they almost seem too soft in the middle.

It may seem too good to be true but luckily for me it wasn't.

So I made this soup for Friday night dinner — with the marinated scallions — and it was a huge hit, even with the carnivorous types who tend to wrinkle their noses at dishes that seem too «healthy.»

While I like wheat muffins, they always seem too heavy when I make them at home.

In fact, 47 percent of Americans now eat at least one vegetarian meal a week.Although for some, trying Indian cuisine remains intimidating and may seem too difficult to prepare.

The reformation for which David calls is thus not one which requires a mere shift in doctrinal belief, something with which Evangelical leaders seem too often too easily satisfied; it also involves the transformation of a whole form of church life, one which he sees as starting in what happens in gathered worship on a Sunday and leads to a reorientation of thinking and living throughout the week.

Perhaps it wouldn't seem too much to ask a Catholic soldier to serve himself and his friends Mass since «bread is bread» and the Muslim chaplain to lead the troops in the rosary because «it's just a prayer.»

If you're like me and you're not rolling in money, the components of getting a date with your spouse can seem too costly sometimes — paying for a date (and a sitter, if you have kids) can start to add up.

Historian of religions Diana Eck traces the growing popularity of the term «spirituality» to the l99Os when the word «religion» came to seem too static and institutional in its connotations, and a gradual shift occurred to the more non-sectarian term «spirituality» Eck herself uses the latter term to designate «the disciplined nurturing of inner spiritual life» (150 - 51).

For some this may seem too mechanical, too much as if the Holy Spirit were being constricted to a pattern.

Fowler may seem too content with words like «escape,» «evade,» «fill gaps» and «refuge» to describe religion's role in a liberal culture.

Does the story seem too sensational to be true?

I think sometimes the alternatives out there either are or seem too few (this is more of an issue in a sparsely populated area as there will be fewer churches, and some communities are just more traditional).

The words seem too big and too small for my wandering thoughts.

That expression may seem too strong — but only if we think the mystical is the exceptional rather than a spiritual experience that belongs to the essence of religion and remains accessible to all believers.

And in case I seem too much the rigid, humorless Luddite, it is important to say that there may be occasions or circumstances when computer - generated visual aids might be used meaningfully in worship.

We are finite, and the demands seem too great, the time too short.

Harris and Hitchens agree with Dawkins, even though they seem too circumspect to blurt it out so plainly.

Other passages seem too idealistic, too fantastic to find their way into even our dreams, much less our daily lives: «For those God foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the likeness of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brothers.»

Others can seem too exclusive, where one kind of spirituality is unfairly dominant over another.

Those for whom God plays a central part in life may think that this makes politics seem too easy.

From that perspective, evangelicals seem too willing to leave it all to God.

Doesn't seem too likely.

I will try not to argue with you right now, since you don't really seem too keen on the idea.

This affirmation may seem too «philosophical» and therefore inopportune to us politically.

Some respondents do not care for Sunday greeters who seem too assertive or deacons who would rather count money and gab in the basement than stay with the worshipers at sermon time.

To some of you personal religion, thus nakedly considered, will no doubt seem too incomplete a thing to wear the general name.

... The great majority of us could not listen; we would find ourselves compelled to evaluate, because listening would seem too dangerous.

But the vast majority will not, because such centers seem too expensive, too distant, too exotic.

We can — and should — make room for joy and defend the simple pleasures and celebrations, the very things that seem too small or too ordinary or too humble to stack up against suffering.

In the following discussion, the definition of «prophet» may seem too restrictive.

The distinctions always seem too large to me, however; and the more time that I spend with inner - city children, the less credible and less legitimate these large distinctions seem.

This doesn't seem too unreasonable.

The concept of nonsuccessive responses to stages of a temporal succession of events may seem too much to swallow, even to those who are prepared to admit the intelligibility of the specious present for cognitive phenomena.

Perry does seem too one - dimensionally oligarchic or crony capitalist at times, and we already see, for example, in mainstream papers that his connections with Merck are much more extensive than 5K.

But what critics who point to these reasons for the loss of certainty seem too often to forget is that the Church is never only a function of a culture nor ever only a supercultural community; that the problem of its ministers is always how to remain faithful servants of the Church in the midst of cultural change and yet to change culturally so as to be true to the Church's purpose in new situations.

This question may seem too simplistic to ask.

@Disciple Mickey: From the descriptions in the Bible of how to beat your slaves, it doesn't seem too much different from what we think of when we use the word «slave» today.

Now, doesn't God, heaven, and cheating death seem too good to be true?

In short, in regard to formation as well as curricular content, the authors of these essays have good ideas but seem too often unconnected to the realities of most contemporary seminaries.

You also seem too eager to assume the «agent that caused the Big Bang» was your favorite deity and not some other natural event.

Some of the insights provided by the first phase of liberation theology seem too important to let slip between the cracks — for instance, the centrality of the category «the poor» for biblical interpretation; the awareness of structural, not just individual, evil; the use of the social sciences as dialogue partner for theological discourse; and the need to apply a hermeneutic of suspicion to theology itself.