We have seen a lot of this before the global crisis of 2007 - 08, and
the seemingly obvious conclusion it that the tendency to increase the savings rate beyond the productive needs of the economy was balanced at least in part by a surge in speculative and unproductive investments.
But I would warn that then following all the then
seemingly obvious conclusions about God and salvation is presumptuous.
Not exact matches
This
conclusion, while
seemingly obvious, in actuality couldn't be further from the truth.
When Slide 4 is taken to the logical
conclusion Lindzen
seemingly wants the honourable members to draw, namely that if greenhouse gases continue on their current rise we can expect a further rise of only 0.8 C over the next 150 years, he's simply using the same linear - trend argument that Girma and Arfur Bryant love trotting out, obfuscated to make it less
obvious.