Sentences with phrase «seems indefensible»

Increasing temperatures of a rural site by 2.26 C of warming since 1934 seems indefensible.

The notion of being «behind the curve» in that regard seems indefensible.

1 To a theist this must seem indefensible, but Leff could not have done otherwise without ceasing to be a modernist.

Not exact matches

In other words, if politics is reducible to technocratic competence then there is something benighted about the clash of interests — out interests seem to be little more than idiosyncratic expressions of our rationally indefensible attachments.

Hartshorne's panpsychism seems to require him to take his concept of the participation of selves in one another to speculative limits that seem, to Brightman, empirically indefensible.

But you seem to be defending the indefensible and a far more obvious conclusion would have been to NOT simply accept the damaging status quo and to demand — as I and countless others have — rightful change.

It seems to me that the whole Nestlé scandal, while indefensible, has been exploited by certain breastfeeding supporters to make the use of formula itself appear morally wrong.

The report adds: «It seems to us indefensible that the Westminster parliament is denied access to the draft conclusions when some other national parliaments are provided with the draft conclusions by their governments and have the opportunity to question ministers about them before the meeting of the European Council.»

Dirty Grandpa may be an indefensible dud, but the actor's recent output is nowhere near as bad as everyone seems to think.

In fact, what seems to be expanding horrifically is ABC's witch - hunt — resulting in increasingly desperate, indefensible claims.

So it seems I'm absolutely indefensible — and why I have six quiet little watercolors in this Biennial.

The second «re-dated» negative alkenone proxy (SI # 23, Isono 2009, off central Japan) seems particularly indefensible.

If you are so against the circling the wagons strategy, I wonder why so many of your posts seem to contribute to defending the indefensible (viz the collusions noted above).

However, they seem to be sticking to much the same approach in the latest draft of the AR5, which is completely indefensible in my view.

It seems a little impractical sacrificing credibility to go some other more twistedly - challenging route — and it raises the question of why that other route is so motivating... Why is it worth a fight defending the indefensible??

Using the OHC slope rather than TOA radiative imbalance N seems bizarre, and scientifically indefensible.

In this context even these students seem to conclude that the risk of allowing this expression is indefensible, and that competing expression challenging their ideas would be ineffective and unsuccessful in dissuading many individuals from joining them.