Not exact matches
To start, make sure everyone involved in hiring decisions
understands the reasons why amazing candidates might
seem less than confident.
When prom - related plans fail to be anything
less than perfect — the prom group falling through, realizing your dress is all wrong the night before the dance, getting a date who doesn't
understand what a «corsage» is — it can often
seem a lot worse than it really is.
What Beijing
seems not to
understand is that current pessimism about the Chinese economy has
less to do with the recent spate of bad news than with the lack of reliable data on the Chinese economy and the opacity of Beijing's process of economic policymaking and its intentions.
OPEC's Secretary General Mohammad Barkindo, who met with hedge fund managers,
seemed shocked that many of them had no «basic
understanding» of oil and were
less savvy than was widely assumed.
For Qoheleth, God
seems remote and uncommunicative, and we can not hope to
understand, much
less influence, God's activity in the world (3:11; 8:16 — 17).
He came to
understand better and better what the others were concerned about, but he came to
understand himself
less and
less, just because it
seemed as though the others excluded him, although he, too, was present.
As a more or
less libertarian, I'm used to having tom explain economics 101 stuff to liberals, but lately it
seems it's the conservatives who least
understand the markets they claim to support.
So, as I began to
understand that, this sort of superficial language of religion
seemed less relevant.»
If this be the case, then an
understanding of the kingdom in three senses — the eternal, righteous rule of the sovereign God; the call to moral obedience in love; and an apocalyptic final consummation —
seems less inconsistent in the thought of Jesus than they have often been assumed to be.
When this world began to become more complex, pluralistic and morally ambiguous and it also became clear that influences other than those which could easily be
understood on Main Street decided the course of events, both the old teachings and the institutions that taught them began to
seem less relevant.
But as McFague has said, «for theology to do
less than fit our present
understanding — for it to accept basic assumptions about reality from a very different time —
seems blatantly wrong - headed» (McFague, 14).
Unfortunately you again assumed and reasoned without knowing and again incorrectly, You don't
seem to
understand that we walk and declare the righteousness of God anything
less would be a lie.
Now maybe if I
understood Russian or there were some subtitles, this Gillette commercial starring Alex Ovechkin would
seem less strange, but I highly doubt it.
Now maybe if I
understood Russian or there were some subtitles, this Gillette commercial starring Alex Ovechkin would
seem less strange,...
I
understand what you're saying bounty hunter, but I feel like the week prior to big games should be enough time to at least tweak our formation slightly or employ a certain tactic, whether it's counter attack with
less possession or playing with two strikers up top instead of the lone striker, I would hope that players at the level required for arsenal would be able to adjust to this as it
seems I tend to hear other teams coming away from big wins uttering phrases like «we worked on the manager's ideas this week and executed them well», I cant remember our players saying this for a while.
I am sure that Wenger is aware of this and the fact that some Chelsea fans are struggling to
understand why Conte does not
seem too keen on Diego Costa, so he slipped in a dig about Morata being
less of a goal threat than Costa, which I reckon will have landed squarely on the chin of his rival.
We have a training system that doesn't
seem to
understand the meaning of much
less the practical demonstration of premier league defending.
Still, their marriages, no matter «the
understanding,» the «emotional elasticity — or financial dependency» that
seems to be beyond comprehension, are no
less a «real» marriage than anyone else's.
Before that time, certainly you can use a high chair to separate your child from hurting another child or harming property, but they are much
less capable of
understanding that what they did had a consequence and you will be frustrated when they don't
seem to «get it» even after many time outs.
I don't profess to
understand the intricacies of how my district figures out the calories (I do know it's averaged over a week) but it
seemed to me that a kid ought to come out at
less than 664 caloires if they're not taking all the food, rather than over that figure.
(1) Your question is based on the ridiculous assumption that economy and politics is a zero sum game and that somehow being «for» middle class means you're «against» (or «don't care about») poor; (2) Leaving that aside, championing the case of 75 % of population over 25 %
seems like a lot
less of a political suicide than championing the case of 25 % over the 75 %, unless I don't quite
understand how voting works in a democracy.
For
less massive stars like the Sun the process that brings them into existence is quite well
understood — as clouds of gas are pulled together under gravity, density and temperature increase, and nuclear fusion begins)-- but for the most massive stars buried in regions like RCW 106 this explanation does not
seem to be fully adequate.
Neuroscientists» quest to
understand consciousness is a hot topic right now, yet you often pose things via psychology, which
seems to be taken
less seriously.
For reasons still not quite
understood, when the lymphocytes repopulate, those involved in attacking the myelin sheath
seem less likely to recover.
To
understand why this is perhaps
less dramatic than it might
seem, it's worth stepping back to see a little context...
It
seems Hansen thinks
less, about 4 W / m2 as well, but I don't really
understand why.
«We are now beginning to
understand that nature
seems to overwhelmingly prefer [planetary] systems that have multiple planets with orbits of
less than 100 days,» says Steve Vogt, astronomer at the University of California, Santa Cruz.
As Katniss strings the guys along (a kiss here, a snuggle there, a teary plea to
understand her confused heart), she
seems less like a strong - minded woman than a coquette wallowing in male attention.
Gudegast, making his feature directing debut after writing «A Man Apart» and «London Has Fallen,»
seems to
understand just enough about that element of Mann's film to recreate some of its conflicts — both in terms of crime scenarios and the characters» civilian lives — but lacks the discipline, or maybe skill, to lend them real emotional weight, much
less originality.
Re-imagining the 1984 classic with female leads (especially one made up of today's funniest women: Kristen Wiig, Melissa McCarthy, Kate McKinnon, and Leslie Jones), directed by a man who not only makes hilarious films but
seems to innately
understand the unique humor women afford to film, Paul Feig, is not only a great indicator that Hollywood might finally be wising up that we need
less Get Hard and more Spy and Bridesmaids.
Henry, you
understand, is a very odd man with a lot of problems, which
seem less like a consistent syndrome than a collection of random neurotic tics.
I think sports games atract more people, are easier to
understand and look
less childish and silly... this game, good as it might be, do nt
seem to have the same potential unfortunately.
Jeff and Kathie regard each other with instant
understanding; she knows from the first sight why he's in her life, and even as Kathie gradually reveals depths of fatale scheming, Jeff
seems less surprised than dismayed to see this side of her, as if he anticipated it but hoped he could keep it contained.
They don't
seem to
understand that the web of conflicting mandates that advocates have placed on the schools over the years — usually under the «equity» banner — are what make it next to impossible for schools to truly run themselves, much
less innovate: «Do this on special education.
«Courage, it would
seem, is nothing
less than the power to overcome danger, misfortune, fear, injustice, while continuing to affirm inwardly that life with all its sorrows is good; that everything is meaningful even if in a sense beyond our
understanding; and that there is always tomorrow.»
But while I
understand this can
seem dodgy, I think it's
less controversial to ask actual readers to do it, if they want to.
If the prospect of producing university level essays and papers
seems overwhelming,
understand that with practice and experience, it will become
less difficult.
You need to
understand that trading
less is a good thing, unlike many aspiring traders
seem to think.
They
seemed to
understand the issues
less well than those they replaced, but were advertised to be really bright.
I
understand the idea of deducting the excess cash because it could be used to immediately reduce the debt and boost the equity value but... On one hand it
seems logical to avoid deducting the cash that is not available for distribution (i.e. couldn't be extracted from the operations), on the other hand that is exactly the part of the cash that is
less likely to bear interests.
Understanding how loans work can make them
seem less scary.
Understand that
less expensive food features
less expensive ingredients like guidelines; acknowledgment that old beliefs
seem to defy common sense; and questions to help make you think more about what you feed your dog.
As rescuers, how do we get people to
understand this and encourage them to take a chance on a pet who may
seem less adoptable?
Just to make myself clear I
understand exactly what it is they are doing, I have seen their tech demo and while the destruction was cool that
seems to be the limit ofnehat they will be able todo in terms of real world applications and I'm yet to see beyond looking fancy how exactly it will drastically alter gameplay vs
less complex destruction and done on console but still a whole destructible world for multiplayer.
Ironically, this is something that both Sony and Nintendo
understand and now with the PS4 Sony are encouraging an open console platform, that will be behind supporting indie self - publishing in a great way, whilst Microsoft
seems to be
less concerned with the market potential that the indie scene has to offer.
In time I
understood it was
less about going from point to point and more about learning about the world, the characters that inhabited it and the many dangers that
seemed to always surround me.
Then, a few days after it appeared, I came across this tweet by @bobbybaird (a.k.a. Robert Baird, a Chicago writer): «Dyer's a great mimic, but I've never
understood the urge to make reviewees
seem less interesting than they are.»
«I hardly
understand anything, much
less anything important, but my inclination must, or
seems to have, some significance in the world in which I am living.»
You don't
seem to
understand that, with a
less than half - baked
understanding of climate science, you've stumbled into a discussion with some extremely knowledgeable people, and then wonder why they don't buy into your «equal time for opposing views» viewpoint.
To
understand why this is perhaps
less dramatic than it might
seem, it's worth stepping back to see a little context...