Sentences with phrase «seems little reason»

And, although there seems little reason to withhold final divorce decrees (there is a compelling interest in the public to know the status of its citizens» marriages), I remain troubled with the new policy's continuing to provide non-parties copies of a divorce «Separation Agreement.»

Further, if damage to the soil itself grounds a claim, there seems little reason why the type of damage should be confined to impairment of the building properties of soil.

There seems little reason to believe that dividend tax relief will give companies better access to capital markets than would otherwise be the case.

There seems little reason to linger at the gate.

On the face of it, there seems little reason to make a road vehicle run on rails, but hundreds of them were converted.

It's an approach that we've seen more recently with titles on the PlayStation Pro, but there seems little reason not to give all console gamers the same choices that PC players have enjoyed forever.

There seems little reason to doubt that Western civilisation will eventually collapse.

With two Dutch researchers bagging last year's Nobel Prize for physics and recent analyses rating the Netherlands among the world's scientific leaders, per capita (Science, 7 February 1997, p. 793), there seems little reason to worry.

There seems little reason to doubt that Cameron will be in a strong position to form a minority government, with the Lib Dems offering «confidence and supply» in a hung parliament.

But there seems little reason to think it is the case.

Di Comenico has close links with a number of Italian top tier sides, including most crucially Juventus and Fiorentina, and there seems little reason to believe he would deliberately seek to misinform the public.

There seems little reason to doubt that Jesus may have used the phrase in this common sense.

Until the beginning of the nineteenth century there seemed little reason to doubt its stories of creation, the Great Flood, its history of humankind, and the story of Israel culminating in the birth, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ.

After seeing what QNX was about yesterday, there seemed little reason for Research In Motion to not adopt the operating system full time for their smartphones; the OS has a mind for stability, lower power consumption, efficiency, a wide variety of developer platform support, as well as rich multimedia capabilities ranging from Flash to 3D rendering.

Not exact matches

After years of dominating the connected speaker market — for good reason — Sonos seemed to be falling a little behind.

I also appreciate Richard Reinsch's introduction to Ralph Hancock's excellent book The Responsibility of Reason, which Peter links below, but it seemed a little odd to me to use Rawls's concept of «public reason» as the key example of the sort of reason - reliance that Ralph wants us to see the insufficienReason, which Peter links below, but it seemed a little odd to me to use Rawls's concept of «public reason» as the key example of the sort of reason - reliance that Ralph wants us to see the insufficienreason» as the key example of the sort of reason - reliance that Ralph wants us to see the insufficienreason - reliance that Ralph wants us to see the insufficiency of.

Hope, confidence, trust» in the midst of a world where there seems so little reason for hope» these are the marks of Fr.

Looking at society from a modern perspective, there seems to be very little reason not to maximize human happiness, as long as it hurts no one.

Pell, for theological and political reasons, seems to have been as far out of Little's loop as any churchman in the archdiocese.

To many people this strategy seems to demand too much of reason and too little of faith proper; but even if we find it attractive, two things may give us pause.

The final self - centered reason for energy conservation may seem a little hard to grasp.

God, always on the safe side, stationed one of his angels with a sword (because guns were not yet invented by men and for some curious reason angelic inventions seem to always lag one step behind human inventions) at the entrance of the garden to keep Adam and Eve and their little youngin's away.

At first sight the reason for this next step may seem a little obscure.

Bergson and Plato, Aristotle and Kant, seem to some of us to have been admired not simply too much or too little but also partly for the wrong reasons.

For all One Direction's dizzying fame, there was little reason to expect much from their solo efforts, which seemed destined to be cobbled together of centrist pop.

For some reason, it would seem that I'm really not responding well to the keto diet: I'm hungry all the time, feel super tired, have very little energy (barely enough to make it through my workouts) and my brain gets pretty foggy, too.

Of late (read: 2014), I've gone to just the Clintonville Market, since all my favorite vendors are there, and it seems pointless to fight the crowds in the Short North and Worthington when there's little reason to do so.

If for some reason it just doesn't seem to be coming together you can try adding a little bit more cornstarch and a tablespoon of beaten egg.

This hard - to - pronounce little food additive is the reason I make my own homemade almond milk and homemade coconut milk, but it seems that there is a lot of confusion when it comes to this little known ingredient.

Does this all seem a little strange, with Florida getting rewarded by fans who would have the best reasons not to reward it?

I get it that the kid should have a choice and be able to go if he doesn't fit in, or whatever the reason was, but that seems a little selfish to me.

Usually for this reason the first week back can be a little challenging, but Arsene Wenger seems to believe that his time are in good stead to continue their winning run of form.

Fedor: I was hoping for some strange reason to see him a little more in shape... I know he is never actually fit, but he seems heavier now than I remember... and not in a good way.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

I know it's a negative comment but interested to see who people think are the weakest links in the team, For me I would say Wilshere & Arteta, For obvious reasons Mikel given he has very little if any physical presence to dominate the centre of the park and Jack purely because it seems our style just does not suite the lad..

Some feel he could improve if the egotistical Portuguese forward were sold (another rumour that seems to have some weight to it as the summer approaches) but Real have little reason to believe they should offloaded their superstar with nearly 300 goals in just six seasons to make way for a player who had one truly outstanding season... two years ago for Tottenham Hotspur.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Given that the 23 - year - old is a mainstay in the team at Atleti and has continued to improve and mature into a top goalkeeper under Simeone, there seems to be little reason for him to want to leave.

Arsenal are a successful club and will always be seriously last season was not that bad for the past 21 years we remind a the top four no club in England had achieved that 21 years on the trot I believe we needed a new look at ourselves and the reason why we have not won it we have not won the premier league in the past 12 years while clubs such Leicester have won it having said that we were the only team to have won them home and away we seem to be a little short at every term in one stage opponents literally broke our players and some were very viciously broken every one ganged against us and we crumbled to the pressure we need to assert our self by winning lower tear competitions and grow to be strong and fight it hard and give other teams what we were giving Firstly we need to unite and create a fortress at the emirate stadium become the twelfth team player once we get the fundamentals right I know and guarantee we will win it all we need to plant our feet in the ground we need unite become one strong unit

There would seem to be little reason why Arsenal would not be testing this logic in the transfer market.

While that may seem a little redundant, there are a lot of great reasons why you might want to have a pouch to use along with your carrier.

Some of my friends are amazing enough to come over just because I asked them to, but I find if I'm adding a little «reason» for the gathering, it just seems more festive.

For this reason, the toys that came with your baby's activity gym may get frustrating at this age - your little one may feel trapped from time to time when he succeeds in grabbing a hanging toy but can't seem to let go.

I've tried swaddling, to no avail (he enjoys sleeping with his arms above his shoulders, so I can see why would hate swaddling); I've asked the local children's services, who basically responded by saying «well, if he's thriving and seems to be happy, then there's no reason to worry» - but I can't imagine that sleeping this little is healthy for him, and I also worry what this means for his future sleeping habits (and honestly, I could use a break as well).

If it seems like a valid reason on my part, I'll give weaning a shot and see if my little is OK it.»

In the interest of making it more interesting and giving trains more places to go (since it doesn't seem like a «Very Useful Engine» would just go gallivanting for no reason), some Fisher Price Little People was incorporated.

If your hair seems to be growing nonstop, and at a much faster rate than it typically does, a little boy may be the reason!

This Act is still in force, but for rather obvious reasons it seems little used.

Even though the disgust response arose for reasons that have little to do with morality, it seems to be pretty effective at shaping moral judgments.»

The fact that the fern only needs a little over an inch of water under it to grow makes the whole scenario seem just within reason — that is, until you learn how much carbon this carbon dioxide - hungry plant sucked up over the course of those million years.