Sentences with phrase «seems very life»

The developer has fine - tuned it in such a way that it seems very life - like and not something that is overly stated.

Facial expressions seem very life like and physical looks of emotion are very prevalent in several parts.

Not exact matches

At $ 89,734, the cost of living comfortably in San Jose may seem like a bargain compared to San Francisco, but it's still very painful, especially if you're trying to stretch those startup funds into the longest possible «runway.»

«What I mean by this is people try and make themselves seem more exciting, so they can sometimes oversell some things or even tell little white lies within very basic parts of their lives.

This mountainous region of Indonesia wouldn't seem like a very hospitable place to live.

It's not glamourous, rewarding or even very interesting, but that's a lot of what living abroad is — looking stupid, trying to look less stupid, terrible loneliness, fleeting successes, and insights that seemed difficult to wrest.

Have you ever envied someone who seemed to to have the perfect life, only to find out later that they were in fact suffering in a very major way?

2) the stair counter doesn't work well — gets very confused when I get on an elevator (I live on the 30th floor of my building and sometimes just taking the elevator up in the morning after a run gives me my full 10 story step goal) 3) the heart rate monitor doesn't seem particularly accurate 4) the sleep tracker doesn't do a good job of figuring out when I go to sleep and when I wake up.

I have consistently voted for the NDP all my life and will continue to do so, but it seems clear to me that, ultimately, Harper has ensured that he and the Conservative Party will retain a stranglehold on power for a very long time indeed.

I think many of us are looking at JNJ as it's such a solid dividend payer and any chance to buy it at better prices seems very rare and short lived.

But with a not - insignificant percentage of money managers making a very good living from the strategy, it seemed as good a place as any to start.

«This was broadcast live, he had the props, it seemed very Fox News like in the sense of its production values.

It's funny, I was chatting with god the other night, you know about girls and money and basically life in general, and then from out of no where god was like, «Yo, Chuckles, I have a job for you, it's very important that you do it, I need you to go and vote this upcoming election and I need you to vote for Rick Perry, he seems a little crazy, but don't worry, he's all good in my book».

It seems like the universe would not be able to support life if those values were very different from what they are — but it's far from certain: it's very difficult to figure out from scratch what the universe would have been like if they had been different.

I think that for an atheist, unlike what many religious people seem to believe about them, life would be so very precious.

I think I'm too simple in my thinking that; if you don't like it, DO N'T WATCH... if you don't agree with it, DO N'T CHOOSE TO LIVE YOUR LIFE THAT WAY... Seems like a very simplistic way of thinking, but I have personal opinions on EVERYTHING, but I don't force others to live their lives according to my moral fiber... i don't judge people for living their lives the way that makes them happy... And i believe that IGNORANCE is the basis for INTOLERANCE... people are famous for HATING things that they don't understand... again, if it MORALLY offends you, don't read stories on things that you don't agree with, don't watch shows that portray choices that you don't agree with... The Brown family seems close knit, almost like extended family living under one roof... the kids work together and get along much better than a lot of «mainstream» households i seLIVE YOUR LIFE THAT WAY... Seems like a very simplistic way of thinking, but I have personal opinions on EVERYTHING, but I don't force others to live their lives according to my moral fiber... i don't judge people for living their lives the way that makes them happy... And i believe that IGNORANCE is the basis for INTOLERANCE... people are famous for HATING things that they don't understand... again, if it MORALLY offends you, don't read stories on things that you don't agree with, don't watch shows that portray choices that you don't agree with... The Brown family seems close knit, almost like extended family living under one roof... the kids work together and get along much better than a lot of «mainstream» households i sSeems like a very simplistic way of thinking, but I have personal opinions on EVERYTHING, but I don't force others to live their lives according to my moral fiber... i don't judge people for living their lives the way that makes them happy... And i believe that IGNORANCE is the basis for INTOLERANCE... people are famous for HATING things that they don't understand... again, if it MORALLY offends you, don't read stories on things that you don't agree with, don't watch shows that portray choices that you don't agree with... The Brown family seems close knit, almost like extended family living under one roof... the kids work together and get along much better than a lot of «mainstream» households i selive their lives according to my moral fiber... i don't judge people for living their lives the way that makes them happy... And i believe that IGNORANCE is the basis for INTOLERANCE... people are famous for HATING things that they don't understand... again, if it MORALLY offends you, don't read stories on things that you don't agree with, don't watch shows that portray choices that you don't agree with... The Brown family seems close knit, almost like extended family living under one roof... the kids work together and get along much better than a lot of «mainstream» households i sseems close knit, almost like extended family living under one roof... the kids work together and get along much better than a lot of «mainstream» households i see...

It seems possible to conceive of a natural order which, like ours, would make moral and rational life possible, but, unlike ours, would not contain features so alien and frustrating to the purposes of the very moral activity it supposedly makes possible.

Bullying other people seems to «prove» to them that they really are smart, buddies with God, and very knowledgeable about how most things should be done and how life should be lived.

But while everyone might know this about putting out natural fires that burn down buildings, it seems that many very wise and intelligent spiritual fire fighters are very confused about how to put out the spiritual fires that are burning down lives all around us.

The more I learned about Islam the more everything seemed to make sense to me, and it became very much a part of my life.»

If you offer nothing, they'll add their own balance: «Sounds good, but work is very busy, and life seems breathless.

Can we accept what seems very unfair in life — because we have accepted the unfairness of God that has saved our very lives?

One thinks of Theresa with her comparison of the life of prayer to a medieval castle, of John of the Cross with his lovely story of the lover in the garden of cypresses, and of Meister Eckhart (the most abstract of them all) with his talk about a spark of deity that seems to become the very self of the person praying.

I don't know a lot about Buddhism, I admit, but so far it has seemed to me to focus very much on the interior lives of individuals.

The cautious conclusion arrived at by Scott is that Tillich's depiction «seems very nearly to describe Camus» affirming vision of life (AC 96).

I would only open up to very few people in my life, because most often than not, no one listened / seemed to care.

It seems to me that in the very beginning the Confession tends to confuse the Living Word with the Written Word.

It would seem wise for us to enter into mature dialogues about this very important area of our live.

Yet as inconceivable as it may seem, the question of his messianic consciousness is a very live one in scholarly circles.

When I'm picking up for the eleventy - billionth time, when every one needs to eat and it seems like we just ate, when we are wondering what to do with our one wild and precious life that sure isn't feeling very wild or precious right about now, when the laundry is piled unfolded and someone spills their full glass of milk on the floor I just washed and the bickering and noise enters its second hour and the house is too hot and there isn't much time for the things that I want to do on the day off, I feel like Sisyphus, futile, pushing a rock up a hill that will never summit.

Pastor Richard, later Father Richard» and of those two titles, I knew him longer under the first than the second» seems to have had from very early years a sharp sense of «living toward death.»

The reason I may seem to not be paying attention is because I have faught all these battles and it is clear so very clear when a person comes into this virtual living room with another spirit.

While, from a pagan perspective, the crucifixion itself could be viewed as a sacrifice in the most proper sense — destruction of the agent of social instability for the sake of peace, which is always a profitable exchange — Christ's life of charity, service, forgiveness, and righteous judgment could not; indeed, it would have to seem the very opposite of sacrifice, an economic and indiscriminate inversion of rank and order.

Some people have very poor lots in life and others seem to have all the advantages.

American women religious today still seem not to have discovered what it is that might assuage their longings, and the seriously ill social ecology of their lives is very much in danger of permanent demise.»

The improbability of life forming by chance makes life being designed seem very very reasonable.

It could not then easily be foreseen that within two short decades human progress, in fact our very physical health or survival, would seem to depend more than ever on a return to laws set by the ever - living God.

On the topic of evolution, which has so divided Christian opinion in the U.S., Artigas does not hesitate: «It seems indisputable that since life has actually emerged, the corresponding potentialities must have existed since the very beginning.»

Indeed (and it seems to me this is a very important statement about us), we live in the only culture in human history that has identified factuality with truthfulness.

This may be a character flaw in someone who writes autobiographies purporting to be true accounts, although even on that score more charitable interpretations are possible (politics of any sort didn't seem to be very important in the life and thinking of Eliade).

(I do not mention Hans urs yon Balthasar, for all that he is at present very fashionable, because, notwithstanding the power of an extraordinary mind, it seems to me that he lived and thought a little marginally to the life of the church, in marked contrast to Ratzinger, who did his work always at the service of the church.)

This young woman is very confused and seems not to understand what science has taught us about the origins and evolution of life.

That is, though suffering and dying are a great crisis of this bodily life, the very deepest problem is the isolation and abandonment they seem to bring.

That paraphrase, perhaps inadvertent, of what the Bible prescribes as the devotion due to God alone suggests an earnestness about ideas that might seem to preclude the intellectual highjinks, pervasive gossip, and boozy fun that, Podhoretz leaves no doubt, was also very much part of the life of The Family.

But very many people seem to want to live as if it were not such a truth.

In Mark, within a very broad general scheme, there is a certain freedom and looseness of arrangement, and in his rather rough and informal style we seem often to overhear the tones of the living voice telling a story.

We all feel at least a slight anxiety about dementia because these dreaded symptoms seem to assault our very identities, to dissolve the autobiographical narratives that constitute the very story of our lives.

I agree that tyhose who lived two thousand years may have come up with some far out ways to address the big questions we still can not answer such as how something came from nothing - George Gamow and his big bang 1500 years from now may very well seem just as stupid.

Whitehead's doctrine does not seem to square with his own view that there is an element of conflict and exploitation in the very structure of life.

He seems to be a very intelligent person, with a love for life and people.