Mill's first claim that happiness is the ultimate object of all desire
seems very questionable, based as it is on psychological evidence which is both suspect in itself and too narrow in scope to establish his conclusion.
However, when the time comes where it is necessary for you to exercise that responsibility,
it seems very possible that I would not willingly at that time hear your rebuke.
And to me that
seems very dark and hopeless and ultimately loveless.
Among the rough and ready tests of character,
this seems a very good one, not infallible but close to it, accounting for the occasional hard day, bad headache, annoying companions: «The way people treat restaurant staff is, I think, a kind of poker tell, revealing a person's character....
It seems very plausible to me that our ceasing to romanticize the family has precipitated, as much as it has reflected, the weakening of the family.
To worry about «churches» disappearing, thus
seems very parochial to me.
It all seems very cultist.
It seems very difficult for this person to simply enjoy gardening or fishing because they are never truly present with what is happening in the here and now... they are remembering a meeting they attended or planning for the future of their work.
«Christ may have meant: If you love mankind absolutely you will as a result not care for any possessions whatever, and
this seems a very likely proposition.
It seems very doubtful, in our present state of knowledge, that much help can be given to others without any direct communication with them, solely by the act of praying for them.
To distinguish between the religious and non-religious messages of a crèche
seems very artificial.
Since Altizer claims the transcendent God has fully and finally died to himself, this hardly
seems very believable.
Sometimes in the experience of deep grief and overwhelming anger, God
seems very far away.
Much of the debate about the Church and power conflicts now going on in many American cities
seems very familiar because it is a replay of discussions in which I was involved in the 1930's when the chief issue was the relation of the churches to the labor movement in its early struggles to achieve power.
This whole concept
seems very valuable given the tone of the blogsophere lately, even around here.
The manner in which they have attempted to synthesise Holloway's insights with a rich view of the unitive dimension
seems very helpful to the ongoing discussion.
All that, today,
seems very distant: it is nowPope John Paul who is seen as the Council's most definitive interpreter and advocate.
This whole concept
seems very valuable given the tone of the blogsophere lately, even...
To me, that church
seems very fishy at best, especially for taking pulpit time asking for bank account information.
Then God
seems very Christlike.
Asking why the universe is logical, repeatable, and consistent
seems very silly to me.
Other than that,
he seems very much like a regular Christian guy who's had a couple of mystical experiences, neither of which have a clear connection to his decision to don a costume.
This seems very problematic to me...
I also echo Cindy's concern that the Bridging the Gap material produced for small groups
seems very «us / them» and more attention to and recognition of gay people in the church is needed.
The appalling rule of the Romanovs, the grotesque privileges of the aristocrats, the obscurantism of the church, the harshness of the courts, the systematic attempts to wipe out other languages and cultures — none of
that seems very encouraging.
Salero
seems very hung up on some very simple concepts, and yet it gets into trouble so easily by attempting to understand current scientific research.
G. W. Lampe notes, «Even assuming that Jesus» grave was known, which is by no means certain,
it seems very possible that neither party was interested in it, or regarded the truth of Easter as dependent on it, until long after the event.
«But nobody
seems very interested in it.
Plato in the Apology quotes Socrates as saying to Meletus, one of his accusers: «You see, men of Athens, this fellow
seems very arrogant and intemperate to me and to have written this indictment out of some sort of insolence, intemperance, and rashness.»
This whole thing
seems very weird, but estrogen is a very powerful hormone and her boyfriend is catholic.
She seems very young, and very young people are still learning and forming ideas.
(Perseverance, patients, etc) Christianity
all seems very individualistic also.
Among the rough and ready tests of character,
this seems a very good one, not infallible but close to it, accounting for the occasional hard day, bad headache, annoying companions: «The way people treat restaurant staff is, I think, a kind of poker tell, revealing a person's character in as long as it takes to say: «I'll have the sea bass».»
In every truth there is something more than we would have expected, in the love that we receive there is always an element that surprises us -LSB-...] In all knowledge and in every act of love the human soul experiences something «over and above», which
seems very much like a gift that we receive, or a height to which we are raised.»
Much of the debate about the Church and power conflicts now going on in many American cities
seems very familiar because it is a replay of discussions in which I was involved in the 1930's when the chief issue was the relation of the churches to the labor movement in its early struggles to achieve...
blah blah blah @artist considerig it was in response to yet another cut and paste from reality
it seems very appropriate
It seems very unlikely that it does.»
Perhaps you're just writing from a place of great angst but the tone of this blog
seems very judgemental and condemning.
It seems very counter-productive to give up my power to something that does not exist.
The release or further adherence to the ceasefire terms now
seems very unlikely.
In retrospect,
it seems very much like the salesman who has been driving himself frantic traveling over his territory and to whom it suddenly occurs that a lot of his best customers, if given the chance, would like to take the initiative and come to him.
Given this understanding of baptism, when Paul spoke of those «who are baptized for the dead,»
it seems very possible that he is referring to all believers when they are baptized.
Not that I agreed with any of it, the character of God in the Bible
seems very unstable, capricious, and inconsistent to me, but whatever.
It seems very important to sound calm and controlled, so I keep my voice steady and informative.
And if this is all true, then
it seems very natural for us to say to our grace - filled Mother, «Pray for us.»
This is quite interesting... I'm waiting for the day when CNN gives their opinion of exactly where gays stand in the Quran and in the Torah... It certainly
seems very easy for news sources to dissect any Christain or Catholic related book or belief..
Mimi, I apologize that it seems so complicated to you,
it seems very simplistic to me....
To view our «natural desires» as bondage
seems very odd to me.
Even assuming that Jesus» grave was known, which is by no means certain,
it seems very possible that neither party was interested in it, or regarded the truth of Easter as dependent on it, until long after the event: until the period of the controversies reflected in Matthew, which would not arise until the empty tomb had become important in Christian thought about the Resurrection.
I must be missing something because this article
seems very irrelevant.