Not exact matches
*
see Jalandara and
Mul bhands
With works by over 50 artists spanning five continents — including Alisa Baremboym, Pamela Rosenkranz, Marlie
Mul, and Timur Si - Qin — The Great Acceleration explores the properties of materials «informed» by human activity,
seen through the videos of participating artists Ian Cheng, Rachel Rose and Camille Henrot, or through the transposition of lightness of pixels onto monumental objects by Neil Beloufa and David Douard.
All that matters are the real world meanings of the major components
MUL,
SAW and AGW.
If anyone knows of a good alternative hypothesis that isn't overfitted, i.e. that doesn't use 14 parameters to model
MUL (or whatever you prefer to define as multidecadal climate) I'd be very interested to
see it.
Hence one can only assume that Greg doesn't like my analysis of
MUL as essentially
SAW + AGW.
I then described the thus - defined low - frequency components of HadCRUT3, namely as
SAW + AGW + MRES, which I refer to as
MUL for multidecadal climate.
As one possible description of
MUL = F3 (HadCRUT3) I've hypothesized that it can be described as
SAW + AGW.
Hence I've described HadCRUT3 as
MUL +
SAW + DEC..
Do you
see «just randomness» in
MUL?
Secondly all I've done is separate HadCRUT3 as a sum
MUL + SOL + DEC, and
MUL as a sum
SAW + AGW + MRES, backed up with a spreadsheet to make it easy to verify the accuracy of my claim.
For further details
see the references given in the text and Kotschi and Müller - Sämann, 2004; Niggli et al., 2007, 2009; El - Hage Scialabba and Müller - Lindenlauf, 2010;
Mul - ler et al., 2011; Muller and Aubert, forthcoming; Muller et al., forthcoming.