I then reply asking for more information and have not
seen a reply yet.
Not exact matches
Science isn't quite there
yet, but a recent analysis from dating website Plenty of Fish offers a few useful insights into how to start a conversation and avoid the dreaded «
seen» marker with no
reply.
«I believe among the things you'll
see is spend (how much was spent on this ad); you will
see who they were trying to advertise to (what is the audience they were trying to reach); and I believe you will also be able to
see some basic information on how much it was viewed,» Schroepfer
replied — avoiding
yet another straight answer.
See my reply to «Cat» below to see my explanation as to why science does indeed back up the reality that things can exist right in front of us, yet never be seen or detect
See my
reply to «Cat» below to
see my explanation as to why science does indeed back up the reality that things can exist right in front of us, yet never be seen or detect
see my explanation as to why science does indeed back up the reality that things can exist right in front of us,
yet never be
seen or detected!
had to
reply to your simplistic view of things... remember we are only human
yet GOD is perfect, all powerful, all knowing and as humans we will never be able to
see things from an omnipotent viewpoint such as GOD's... so remember bad things happen daily and it is GOD's will but who are we to question GOD allmighty when we only think in mindset of humans... do nt let ur foolish pride put a spotlight on ur ignorance...
The Jews
replied, «You aren't 50 years old
yet, and You've
seen Abraham?»
Ivan, Thanks for the
reply and I agree with your comments regarding Jon and myself.I do find it intriguing that he hasn't come forward with his portfolio as a successfull premier league manager and premier league referee
yet but let's wait and
see.
I have
seen a lot requests for part 2...... I have
yet to
see any
reply's though.
Ive been reading everyone's
reply's but I have
yet to
see..
It would be a good thing to
see someone analyze /
reply to Alexander Cockburn, who has just published
yet another «debunking» of climate science on the pages of Counterpunch: http://counterpunch.org/cockburn04302010.html
I have
yet to
see your
reply to my new post, where I outline that it is evident on physical grounds that the increase in global avg temp is not merely random: A random increase would cause a negative energy imbalance or the extra energy would have to come from another segment of the climate system (eg the ocean, cryosphere, etc).
The SCC has not
yet seen fit to include the appellant's
reply factum, the factums of the four interveners, or the respondent's
reply to the interveners» factums.
He told me the list price in his msg, without asking me ANY questions, told me the house had sold promptly, just the sold sign wasn't up
yet, suggested another company's listing in the area if I would like to
see it instead — to call him back, in his
reply message to me.