Sentences with phrase «seen anyone claim»

# 2 I don't think I have seen anyone claim station data was perfect, anywhere.

This is the first time I've ever seen anyone claim otherwise.

# 2 I don't think I have seen anyone claim station data was perfect, anywhere.

Never seen anyone claim any of the above.

I have never seen anyone claim this.

I don't see anyone claiming to know everything, so I guess you're just talking about your god or something right?

And nowhere do I recall seeing anyone claim Obama would bring «peace around the world».

But I don't see anyone claiming this to be the case.

Not exact matches

Ok snide hat off: I agree that if anyone thinks they have all the answers they need to crack open many many many many more books, nor have I seen christians claim they know all the answers just as much as atheist do, however it is crazy that christians, and other relgious folks, seem to know what happens after death, how is it you got those answers?

I have not seen any support, nor any logic for that matter, for any claims made on this comment section by anyone else yet it is the Christians you zero in on.

Anyone who claims to see otherwise - invisible spiritual creatures is either lying or hallucinating.

One I would like to see stopped is claiming relegion as killed anyone.

It is amusing to read these boards and see Heaven's Stinker here, particularly when she claimed she did more for others in a week than anyone could imagine!

Every store, movie, court room, school, sporting event and public park I don't see anyone doing what you claim.

Can anyone actually claims to have seen Shiva or Krishna?

fred... yes fred, i have a better way — but you sir, i have no need to keep this conversation going, for you are terribly thick headed, and beyond brainwashed by religion... you claim to believe the bible and what is has to say yet allow for me to be a di - ck to god without fear of recourse or any form of punishment from god — back in the day, i would have been smoted, now you losers claim that he will just torture me forever in hell as my punishment — this implies that god has learned better ways to function as god — whoa, did anyone else just see what i said, god learned... thats rather un-godly, to learn, being he is all knowing - but your right, i am wrong... jesus christ where did i put my fuk you card, oh god - dam - nit... i must have thrown it away with all the other garbage i don't use... well too bad.

It has also been difficult to see God in those who claim to have love but are only ringing gongs or who claim to embody God but seem intent on steamrolling anything or anyone who gets in their way.

I've never read anyone claim we have a divine right to titles, but I have seen people say we should be competing given the resources we have.

Has anyone else seen the recent report claiming that Gazidis received a # 1 million bonus??

A claim I believe I heard on Heavy Hands (or possibly just repeated there...), and I've yet to see anyone surpass his talents.

Anyone claiming iwobi doesn't deserves to be an arsenal player siting lack of potential or insufficient potential is clearly ignorant about football.this is a player requiring 2 to 3 changes in his to become world class.Need i remind my fellow gooners that out of the stellar caste of academy players which include dion zelalem, Jeff Adelaide, Chris willock, biellick, akpom etc iwobi is the only one making the first team this I assure you is not mere luck or coincidence or as sum here would be put it «being Wenger's favourite» - most so called wenger favourites are actually our best players - but becos of his immense potential, clear headedness and hard work.lest we forget he was actually in contention for the golden boy award.so does of you not seeing his potentials should f**k off.

It's hard to see anyone wanting to claim Smith given his $ 4.35 million cap hit.

Now he has a bone to pick with authority — politicians who claim that certain educational exhibits are unfit for public eyes, scientists who claim exclusive viewing rights to the human anatomy — anyone, in short, who insists that it is better not to see, ask, or judge for oneself.

It is impossible to not consider this path when desiring optimal, as well as preventative, health but unfortunately, I have yet to see anyone who has claimed a «bizarre and unexplainable» condition be restored without this consideration.

It's essentially a safeguard in case anyone comes in claiming that those glasses are there's, they can look to see who the glasses are actually registered too.

I marvel at his Thomas Hardy adaptations — the devastating Jude and the redemptive The Claim (his take on The Mayor of Casterbridge)-- and I hadn't thought, before I actually saw him do it, that anyone but Charlie Kaufman would have a shot at turning Tristram Shandy into a viable film.

OK, so most Christians and Jews would readily disbelieve anyone who claimed to be told by God to do anything as monumental as building an ark, but when you see mass migrations of birds not indigenous to the area following Evan around, there has to be a moment where even an agnostic would pause to think, «What if he's telling the truth?»

Indeed, anyone who has spent much time in the company of school reformers in the past decade has seen this practice turn almost comical, as when charter - school operators try to one - up one another over who can claim the most disadvantaged student population.

While Volvo claims a «new, confident face» for the brand, anyone who's seen a Buick Enclave in the past few days will recognize numerous design similarities, particularly in the vertical grille bars.

However, I don't see that as any different than anyone claiming anything these days in the publishing industry, including people who claim to be writers.

I'm not going to claim that I saw it all, not by any means, but I probably managed to cover a lot of the main sights and I think I have a few useful suggestions and tips for anyone thinking of visiting Finland's Capital.

As anyone familiar with A World of Ice and Fire will know, nothing is more satisfying than seeing a villainous character meet his / her end, the same kind of satisfaction you'll find when (depending on your actions), Ludd Whitehill finally meets his bloody end and claims his spot on being one of the most satisfying villains to defeat.

Even acknowledging the achievements of the sculptors, I don't see what is gained — for anyone — by the artists (or at least one of the artists) involved making such huge claims for it.

All I'll say in response is that when one sees a claim that on its face makes no sense, then no amount of mathematical legerdemain is going to make it look any more convincing to anyone with critical thinking skills.

I can't claim a methane burp would be any less horrific than described by the worst case claims, just that I haven't seen anyone documenting it's happened in the paleo record.

I'm not an expert on this subject, but I don't believe anyone claimed that 2004 by itself represents some sort of trend, but that 2004 is part of a trend that can be seen over the last 30 years or whatever arbitrary time frame you wish to select).

For example: «But I've seen a variety of claims being made here that conflict with my own understanding, and I'm simply asking if anyone can explain the physics to me so I can see if / why I got it wrong.

Libertarians look at such things as social / economic planning, centralized, top - down structures and natural systems (such as the climate) and see them as largely unpredictable and uncontrollable, and they are very suspect when anyone claims to be able to do so.

Now, let's test your claim that «Anyone can use their own eyes to see that they are limiting it to going back to 1760.»

Anyone, anyone, with even a smattering of real world basic knowledge of this can see immediately that the claims of AGWSF's Greenhouse Effect Energy Budget are total codswAnyone, anyone, with even a smattering of real world basic knowledge of this can see immediately that the claims of AGWSF's Greenhouse Effect Energy Budget are total codswanyone, with even a smattering of real world basic knowledge of this can see immediately that the claims of AGWSF's Greenhouse Effect Energy Budget are total codswollop.

So if you hear anyone make the claim that climate change is the most important environmental problem facing the globe now or whenever, ask to see the analysis that compares climate change with other problems.

Given that the blackbody equilibrium temperature of earth as seen from space is a function of solar irradiance arriving and earth albedo and not much of anything else apart from factors that change those two, anyone claiming earth's temperature isn't affected by solar output better have a pretty good theory and data to support that.

We've yet to see anyone making the claim that either we, or Spiked etc «uphold the true spirit of the revolutionary left», let alone either them or us.

I don't see how you or anyone can honestly claim that this mid century cooling business is settled.

I haven't seen anyone disputing this (although Steven Mosher claims it's «unverifiable» — perhaps he is having trouble finding the code and data that Tony publishes), and it can be relatively easily checked by examining the data.

I also fail to see how anyone can make the claim they actually know what the global average temps reall are for a given year, decade or century.

If you're interested in seeing what playing the player instead of the ball looks like, check out the alarmist site Only In It For the Gold, where Michael Tobis unleashes endless vicious ad hominem against any skeptics who raise their voice (his most recent was a long diatribe against Freeman Dyson, whom he apparently considers a geriatric buffoon), and opens threads on what names one should call «denialists», regularly bans commenters who argue a point too vociferously, or anyone claiming scientific credentials but arguing against «the consensus».

This case is worth reading for anyone advancing an ICBC claim where the issue of causation of a disc bulge is at issue to see the types of competing positions that can be advanced by the doctors at trial along with the analysis that a court can engage in to navigate the waters of expert opinions.

Rarely nowadays do I see anyone handle a medical malpractice claim, either for the injured patient or the healthcare provider, who does not practice almost exclusively in the professional liability field.

I see that most of these reviews are for visitors to the U.S. Can anyone provide insight to how effective Seven Corners is at responding to claims from outside of the U.S. — say S.E. Asia?