Sentences with phrase «seen anyone suggest»

While there are different views on whether it should be raised or lowered, I haven't seen anyone suggest that we are «tearing ourselves inside out» to get there.

I haven't seen anyone suggest that.

Nowhere do I ever see anyone suggest wetting the kibbles but always recommend giving plenty of water or adding wet food throughout the week.

Again, I'm not an expert and I haven't formed an opinion on what percentage of the warming is due to anthropogenic influence, but I have yet to see anyone suggest that anything good might result from warming.

I've yet to see anyone suggesting it was the eccentric pursuit of a secret seashell - loving craftsperson — but the grotto's discovery wasn't much earlier than when the French postman, Ferdinand Cheval, began building his folk art wonderland, Le Palais Idéal, not far away in France.

Not exact matches

Within that range, content should simply not be shown to anyone whose personal controls suggest they would not want to see it, or at least they should see a warning first.

I did not see anything in the post that suggested «supporting» anyone's «sinful behavior».

They don't question it, and like the Pharisees of old, they'll vilify anyone who suggests that God sees things differently.

I would suggest that it's due to an awakening to the real pain that promiscuity and abortion entail; others might say that it's actually based in «rights talk,» that young people identify with aborted children (as of this January 22, anyone under the age of thirty could have been aborted) and see abortion as an attack on their siblings and classmates, rather than a matter of women's self «determination.

I see no evidence in the Bible that anyone came to Christ because someone else was the model you suggest with scripture.

I don't see them trying to draft anyone to start (maybe a later round prospect a la Mannion like you suggest to try to groom, but not start).

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Not seen as a legend anymore just a senile despot trying to cling to the belief that he is still a good manager when evidence suggests he couldn't motivate anyone.

Silent Stan is an issue and your stupidity at defending him will lead other idiots astray, people who like to point the blame at the 1st thing they see and take the p ss out of anyone who may suggest otherwise... That is the kind of foolishness that holds humanity back, did Galileo act like you?

I think most neutrals would see those results as mental weakness — I don't think anyone is suggesting we can not beat these teams with what we have.

But a source with direct knowledge of the PIN strategy noted that Cuomo «was attorney general and he saw what happens when emails you think were gone suddenly are recovered during investigations — not to suggest anything is going on or anyone has done anything wrong.»

He said: «I see nothing at all in the search warrant application that would give rise to probable cause, nothing that would make anyone suspect that there was anything on the laptop beyond what the FBI had already searched and determined not to be evidence of a crime, nothing to suggest that there would be anything other than routine correspondence between Secretary Clinton and her longtime aide Huma Abedin.»

And it's not just ignoramuses whose news is thus polluted: the recent furore over Facebook's curation of its trending topics suggests that anyone who leans on social media for their news may be seeing a funhouse mirror of the truth.

Before that, I didn't even know what a rheumatologist was, and my doctor had never suggested that I see anyone else.

If anyone has ever suggested you might be a defensive person and you listened to this criticism out of curiosity and then began to observe your behavior to see if the accusation had any truth to it, it is likely that you are not a highly defensive individual.

I'm not suggesting that anyone eat this way, but if you really think you can't get your calories (and thus protein) needs for the day by eating greens, you have not seen this video from Bite Sized Vegan.

I still disagree and actually think it's silly to suggest that anyone would attempt to say that any one piece is actually appropriate for ALL offices, seeing as it has been acknowledged here time after time that the dress in offices greatly varies.

If you are registering from the US I would suggest creating a free profile and seeing if there's anyone in your area, before upgrading to a paid membership.

I'm suggesting this film to Simon M., The Creep, Brantastic16, Wisenheimer, and anyone who want to see this great drama.

Writer / actor suggests anyone planning to see the third installment in the rebooted franchise go into promotion lockdown until they have a seat for the film

He suggests there that the SBAC will be a good measure of student achievement — but fails to mention that there will be no results this year for anyone to see and no feedback, nothing.

For anyone looking for a more practical and spacious vehicle we suggest you see the Ford Explorer near Fort Worth, Texas.

If anyone is aware of any case law that decides the meaning of «the authority of the copyright owner» in this subsection, I'd love to see it — but a brief skim suggests that this is an open issue.

While I haven't seen much about this, at least not when compared with some of the uproar a few weeks ago over reviews disappearing, there's enough talk about it to have me suggesting anyone who has published a romance title that might fall into erotica or the «harder» romances check your titles.

I've yet to see a single market analysis from Hachette or anyone else that suggests Amazon's wrong.

We strongly suggest that anyone who is thinking of getting a Komondor should make every effort to see some adult Komondors in their homes before making a final decision.

The history of the domestication of dogs is anyone's guess, but there is plenty of evidence to suggest that the herding behavior we see in today's modern stockdogs originated in the time when tribes used wolves and wild dogs to hunt.

I didn't think I was likely to see that kind of arrogance again, but I guess that was before Don Mattrick suggested that anyone who didn't want to be connected 24/7 should just keep playing their 360 in a tone so serious that you can tell that they all sat around in a marketing meeting and agreed that was their talking point.

There are a ton of Nintendo Switch cases available, and they all do a pretty good job at protecting the expensive handheld, but this particular one is Rossko's case of choice, seeing as it doesn't have anything on the outside that would make anyone suggest there was a Nintendo Switch inside.

This so - called vitality is not as far - fetched as it may sound, as recent plant research suggests that plants have an ability to see light, perceive sound (Day of the Triffids, anyone?)

I don't think anyone denies that the sun matters for climate, but the question is whether the variability of the sun in recent history has had the impact that we project from greenhouse gases over the next 100 — and there, I think, a majority of your «AGW» ers» would think the evidence suggests that changes in human forcing will likely be several times (at least) larger than any solar variability we've seen in a thousand years or more.

This is however more than anyone has ever suggested and would be comparable to the amount that disappeared at the Eemian (125,000 years ago)(see this post for more on that).

I didn't read through all the comments to see if anyone else suggested the same question, but mine is: What does it take to falsify AGW theory?

I only ask because, as far as I can see, it's absurd to suggest that anyone denies climate.

It is difficult to extract sound bites from a case like this and I suggest that anyone interested in Brain Injury litigation in British Columbia review this judgement in full to see some of the types of issues that can arise in MTBI cases.

If there's a suggestion you want to make, search the topic first to see if anyone has suggested it.

Bankrate suggests keeping all shrubs, bushes and trees trimmed enough that every porch, door and window can be easily seen by neighbors and anyone passing by.

Consumers see 3D face scanning as more of a significant upgrade, Kuo suggests, which will lead to a boost in sales for anyone who can package it in a phone.

The public key, as the name suggests is public and anyone can see it (which is actually your bitcoin address), but your private key is secret.

However, this is not true and i predict anyone who does do their resume in the way the author suggests will not only not get a job, they will be the laughingstock of anyone that sees it.

I would suggest refraining from buying new, just using the old until it's gone or (if like me you have gone crazy during those after Christmas sales, using social media to see if you know anyone who needs some, before they go out and buy new.