I've
seen arguments for him as the # 1 pick, but most mocks leave him out of the first round.
I could
see an argument for having some price controls and more competition.
If the Fed believed that a 2 percent inflation target was appropriate at the beginning of 2012 when it believed the neutral real rate was above 2 percent, I can not
see any argument for not adjusting the target or altering the framework when the neutral real rate is very plausibly close to zero.
Is there someone who teaches this that
I see the arguments for it?
Other than a severe bias against Jameis, I don't
see the argument for saying he hasn't improved, a simple look at his stats show he has.
Lehtera I can
see an argument for buying out if you're going to try to land Tavares or something.
I can
see the argument for RBs but not for WRs especially if those are Flacco's favorite type of guys.
I could
see an argument for Diaz not being a top fighter these days, but McGregor took the fight straight to him and played his style of striking game, something that most people avoid because Diaz is pretty damn good at it.
I could
see an argument for Chandler or Barnes from a defensive versatility perspective, and Wes is just a fighter and the obvious sentimental pick.
Definitely can't
see the argument for firing him right now.
Personally, I would go with Vieira and O'Kane but I can
see the argument for a Vieira / Phillips, a Vieira / Anita, or an O'Kane / Phillips partnership.
That said, I can
see an argument for a snap contest in these exceptional circumstances.
I totally
see the arguments for laying off the coffee to evaluate whether it's one of the main causes for my own acne or whether even just reducing my intake would have an effect... I'm gonna give it a shot!
whilst this is a very one - sided discussion, I can
see arguments for using a controlled and moderate bounce to achieve certain goals.
I can
see the argument for picking weirder peices as part of the «fun» but classics are classics for great reasons:)
I can
see the arguments for and against here but it's loss, to me, isn't that big of a deal as the upside here takes the game's fun level and turns it up a few notches.
I can
see arguments for and against both.
You do not
see arguments for more standardization, or for driving national reform efforts by panic - driven demands to score higher on PISA.
That said, it's nice to
see an argument for the idea of a FORMAT.
I could
see an argument for anywhere in the «enthusiasm» to «greed» area as well.
I can
see the argument for Preferred Rewards belonging there, but I think of the relationship bonus as sort of a different thing
But I can
see the argument for the latter in that, I'm «transferring» use of a vehicle I «own» (at least, financed) to family members, and so it has nothing to do with (direct) support.
Brawl, but I could at least
see the argument for that since the NES port of Metal Gear did quite well.
But I don't
see the argument for doing nothing.
There is alot of controversy surrounding the bill with many arguing that its expansive definitions will wreak havoc in the workplace and lead to frivolous litigation (
see some arguments for and against here).
I suppose I can
see an argument for utter perfection from an historical perspective, that we want a record of absolutely everything because we want a record of absolutely everything.
I can
see the argument for closing law schools in cities that have four or five.
Not exact matches
But I've yet to
see a really robust version of that
argument, let alone an explanation of why firing makes more sense, ethically, that this punishment alone is the right one, ethically, than all those other outcomes, or —
for those who believe this is true — why he deserves everything on the menu.
«
For this, I don't see what the argument is for being illegal,» Baer sa
For this, I don't
see what the
argument is
for being illegal,» Baer sa
for being illegal,» Baer said.
But the comments show Kocherlakota continues to marshal new
arguments for keeping interest rates low even as most of his colleagues
see the time
for a rate increase as approaching.
For starters, you can use it as a way to list the pros and cons of each side of an argument, much in the same way that ProCon.org does for major and controversial political issues (see my example belo
For starters, you can use it as a way to list the pros and cons of each side of an
argument, much in the same way that ProCon.org does
for major and controversial political issues (see my example belo
for major and controversial political issues (
see my example below).
The slowdown in job growth and the absence of any significant wage pressure could strengthen the
arguments of those who
see little risk in keeping borrowing costs exceptionally low and waiting not just
for more encouraging data but also
for unruly markets to settle down.
We are NOT encouraging you to copy content, merely to
see whether you perhaps missed some information or
arguments for your own blog post.
First, the Bank of Canada convinces the Department of Finance and the Conservatives that it «needs» expanded powers to purchase a broader range of securities (
see my earlier post
for why their
arguments are not very convincing).
PLANADVISER: So, do you
see a problem in the lawsuit's
argument that hedge funds and private equity investments are inappropriate
for defined contribution retirement plans?
While I don't think I'll start using a debit card, I can
see a good
argument for spending cash, especially with businesses you trust.
I
see good
arguments for continued easy money and economic growth to push multiples to all - time highs, and economic strength and tax cuts to push earnings higher.
Despite a lingering
argument over whether Bitcoin is more or less important than its underlying tech, Consensus 2016
saw keynote addresses and panel discussions on applications
for blockchain or distributed ledger technology in cross-border payments, smart contracts, government, security, identity, the Internet of Things, and all different kinds of clearing and settlement.
Much of your
argument such as I've
seen,
for your sky fairy (and I really think that is an appropriate term
for your obviously fictional deity with all the self - contradictory tales about it in the bible), really seems to consist of a combination of willed ignorance and
arguments from ignorance.
I've
seen some valid
arguments made
for holding a large percentage of bonds.
Ok we muslims don't love one another and don't love anyone else, just
for the sake of
argument, can't you guys
see the hate that is dripping from your mouths....
«I Don't Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist»... book you should check out explaining the
arguments for God and why the God of the Bible is the most fitting explanation
for what we
see in the world.
Seeing it again, the movie,
for all its violence and seeming nihilism, is a sustained
argument for the personal significance of all people and the need
for personal love.
I understand the
arguments for fighting and war, but strangely, I
see none of them in the New Testament.
If their
argument wasn't so flimsy, this might even seem like an outright attack on faith (however, given the nature of the whole list, it's really hard to take it seriously, and
see it as anything more than a bad hot take
for a sake of a hot take.)
See P. Gardiner - Smith, St. John and the Synoptic Gospels (1938), a very convincing
argument for «John's» complete independence of the Synoptics.)
Even among Christians,
for whom scripture should be a guide to life's challenges, many cling to the idea that issues such as abortion and the end of life are so complex that only a simple - minded person, unable to
see two sides of an
argument, could possibly take a firm stance.
If you are offended by someone's position, you can counter it with your own
arguments and expose their error
for the world to
see and reject.
suffering, true sociality, as qualities of the divine, along with radical differences (as we shall
see) in the meanings ascribed to creation, the universe, human freedom, and in the
arguments for the existence of God, those inclined to think that any view that is intimately connected with theological traditions must have been disposed of by this time should also beware lest they commit a non sequitur.
Once we
see clearly the fundamental conception underlying Thomas» sometimes unclear formulations, we can also
see the fundamental requirement
for the acceptance of the
argument.