Sentences with phrase «seen as a rebuttal»

The taking of the key seats is also seen as a rebuttal of Corbyn's decision to appoint controversial political allies to the leader's office as well as a warning to Corbyn not to continue challenging existing party policy, such as nuclear defence.

Not exact matches

But then Maple Group released a rebuttal that makes the its report look like a homework assignment submitted by a Grade 9 student, as can be seen at www.abetterexchange.com.

I will also add that I would rather see rebuttals to Harpur rather than what seems to be an endorsement as to why he should be read.

Zwingli called it «Friendly Rejoinder and Rebuttal to the Sermon of the Eminent Martin Luther against the Fanatics»; he saw himself as an Erasmian and peace - loving, reasonable and humanist, indeed Christian.

«I actually go to work more than I go to party,» said Wang, in a rebuttal of anyone who persists in seeing him as the pleasure king of Wangfest.

difference between living and non-living things was seen as a reasonable rebuttal.

I see you want to cast aspersions here and I bet you believed you were being clever when claiming you were doing an ad hominem attack; you weren't, by the way, you specifically mentioned that you were attacking an argument and ad hominem would be an attack on my person as a rebuttal to my argument)

As far as biennials go, this one is important for including a high number of artists of color, which should be seen as much as a reflection on New Orleans as it is a rebuttal to the usual structure of the art world, which tends to skew white and malAs far as biennials go, this one is important for including a high number of artists of color, which should be seen as much as a reflection on New Orleans as it is a rebuttal to the usual structure of the art world, which tends to skew white and malas biennials go, this one is important for including a high number of artists of color, which should be seen as much as a reflection on New Orleans as it is a rebuttal to the usual structure of the art world, which tends to skew white and malas much as a reflection on New Orleans as it is a rebuttal to the usual structure of the art world, which tends to skew white and malas a reflection on New Orleans as it is a rebuttal to the usual structure of the art world, which tends to skew white and malas it is a rebuttal to the usual structure of the art world, which tends to skew white and male.

I'm trying to point out how AGW fisics is created by sleights of hand by tweaking real physics and promoted as «real world» by manipulating those taught this by giving them even more stupid reasons which they give as rebuttals, which they can't see are stupid because they don't known the real world physics which shows how stupid the rebuttals.

As far as I can see, and typical of «rebuttals» from both, the explanations given change depending on the questions asked, there's no internal coherence in C / AGWSF as it was designed to obfuscate not educatAs far as I can see, and typical of «rebuttals» from both, the explanations given change depending on the questions asked, there's no internal coherence in C / AGWSF as it was designed to obfuscate not educatas I can see, and typical of «rebuttals» from both, the explanations given change depending on the questions asked, there's no internal coherence in C / AGWSF as it was designed to obfuscate not educatas it was designed to obfuscate not educate.

As a bystander of little science expertise, but some experience in public policy analysis, here is a framing of the three major rebuttals I've seen to Bates» claims.

Scientists generally supporting the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) findings on climate change see this correction of the UAH temperature analyses as a significant vindication of their findings on this issue and, as such, as a major rebuttal to climate contrarians who long had pointed to the differences in surface and upper atmosphere warming trends as supporting their viewpoints.

However, as you can see by reading carefully through the 561 comments on the Montford post to which the current post is a rebuttal, Gavin has declined to extend the discussion at RC and has not posted follow up comments from a number of substantive and polite commentaters here.

Regarding Trenberth, having looked at the slides, I don't see Roger's interpretation, personally, but on the other hand I don't find his accusation of «recklessness» nearly as ad - hom as Eli's quite sarcastic and personal rebuttal post.

The comments come as a rebuttal to recent speculation linking the sale to the losses seen in both bitcoin and the wider cryptocurrency market.