It can encourage such protection inasmuch as the animal is seen as having perhaps been a close and dear relative, and yet it can also discourage such protection inasmuch as the animal can be
seen as sacrificing itself for the sake of a better birth in the future, leading ultimately to an escape from rebirth altogether (Bowker, 6).
Crosbie: I don't
see it as a sacrifice.
Not exact matches
They
see avoiding those things
as sacrifice and deprivation.
Did people
see serving and supporting those who served
as deprivation and
sacrifice?
Before my experiment of a year without flying, I would have
seen not flying
as deprivation and
sacrifice, but my experience taught me that my happiness, joy, adventure, cultural exploration, and so on didn't depend on flying.
Right from the beginning, set things up so group members
see the manager
as leading from the front, sharing in their uncertainties and
sacrifices.
As you can
see, the
sacrifices of owning your own business are many.
So,
as far
as I can
see, essentially the same outcome
as the double - credits achieves, both in terms of revenue for Shell and cost to the CCEMF could have been achieved with a $ 15 per - ton - sequestered payment from the CCEMC without
sacrificing the integrity of emissions reduction accounting within the offset program.
Like many who have served, I have
seen more than my share of
sacrifice and valor, and I am here today
as a proud veteran.
As Samuel would later say to Saul who
saw it fit to disobey the command of God — «to obey is better than
sacrifice»
Conservatives can not push enough Democrats and wobbly moderates toward greater comfort with originalist - like its - the - only - Constitution - we've - got thinking, can not get them to
sacrifice the judicial avenue to what they
see as policy goodies, or get them to really censure the kinds of unconstitutional short - cuts Obama is modeling, if they think that folks like you and I believe that Real originalism would ban hours - laws, collective bargaining, etc..
Furthermore, there is certainly enough evidence in the discrepant personalities of the OT v. NT deity to indicate a «changing nature,» i.e., one who
sees no other option but to destroy humanity and then later destroy entire civilizations
as opposed to one who prefers the option of alleged self -
sacrifice coupled to a merciful «grace» for those who are willing to just believe in the
sacrifice.
At the time there were no safety bars, nothing to confirm I was doing the right thing, and I was looked at
as a backslider by many I grew up with... but respected by the world because they
saw I was after God himself and willing to
sacrifice everything for it.
What we meant to model was the sending of one of our number to be a foreign missionary — to learn a new language, to understand a local culture, to
sacrifice the amenities of affluence and to live knowing that he or she is always being watched by seekers — while the rest of us stay here
as lifetime local missionaries, learning to speak the language of the unchurched, understanding secular culture,
sacrificing the amenities of affluence and living
as a «watched» person in a society that is skeptical of Christian spirituality until it
sees the real thing on display.
And I
see no reason why the self -
sacrificing love of Jesus can not be modeled in a committed same - sex relationship
as well
as it can be modeled in a committed heterosexual relationship.
It means to
see the suffering we go through (whether we want it or not) from the perspective of Christ, Paul, Peter, and countless people who suffered for the sake of their faith and offered their suffering to God
as a
sacrifice on behalf of others.
We need only look about, even in France, to
see to how great a degree planning involves calculations
as to what must be
sacrificed.
The problem comes with
seeing Christ's atoning
sacrifice,
as some Evangelical Protestants do, in terms of punishment.
Today, though a Christian be
as thoroughgoing
as the Quakers in discarding ritual, he must none the less appreciate the often superior quality of inward spiritual life and outward social service on the part of those who in the
sacrifice of the Mass
see Christ verily present.
In place of the synagogue came the church; in place of circumcision came baptism; in place of the temple altars came the acceptance of Christ's
sacrifice in the Lord's Supper; and while only the first suggestions of the early Catholic rubric are within the canon, these suggestions are there, presaging,
as they are
seen in retrospect, the repetition of all the good and evil fortunes that in every age and faith have attended sacramentalism.
To people who
saw Jesus
as God incarnate and / or
as the required unblemished
sacrifice to atone for our sins, it may have been both necessary and believable that he was perfect.
Although you may
see it
as just some sort of rough weekend and not a big deal, or that the whole
sacrifice thing may have happened on the fly to fix some faux pas by God the Father, I
see it
as something that was specifically planed right from before this world was created and that it was not some sort of ad hoc contingency, but something that was part of the Father's plan all along.
She expresses her resentment over what she
sees as her children's lack of gratitude for all her hard work and
sacrifice (Grandma 6).
Genesis 6 Now these nephilim and the fallen angels (who were
seen as Gods in Egypt) oppressed the people and also taught them about jewels, gold, iron working, war... and also forced many
sacrifices of humans to these Gods.
But this «Therefore» doesn't make sense if you look a the end of chapter 11, where Paul has digressed in a lengthy doxology, which while it discusses intriguing mysteries of God and praises God, doesn't lead to the logical conclusion that we should present ourselves
as living
sacrifices to him, but if you read into that «οὖν» an «
as I was saying earlier», you can
see that before the doxology he issued an important warning in Romans 11:22 — if God is willing enough to be so severe
as to cut of the natural branches (the Jews) he will certainly be willing to cut of the ones that have been grafted on (the Gentiles); Romans 12:1 - 2 is a very logical «therefore» to follow Romans 11:21 - 24.
The significance of the
sacrifices was to
see our sinfulness and turn our hearts back to God and that is made clear with the death of Christ.The animals though could not remove our sin that was only possible through Christ
as God he could remove sin in the past present and future
as he is outside of time and space not like us.So there sins in effect were covered by Jesus
as well in the old testament
as in the new by Gods we just did nt
see it.The example of abraham able enoch they all were righteous they were justified before God.Enoch walked with God and was no more that sounds like the rapture to me so the holy spirit was present in that age just like us.We
see that God has always been at work to bring life and to bring mankind to salvation.
Politics takes money — and that kind of money only comes from the elites of the system currently in place — and they won't
sacrifice their lucrative positions to placate what they
see as nothing more than an angry mob that they hope will soon disperse.
In Hebrews 2:17 and 4:14 - 16 the Jewish cultus of the temple is brought to mind and Christ is
seen as the supreme
sacrifice which assuages God's anger and enables us to come before Him.
its a shame to
see such a cool guy fall for something
as silly
as Theism and blood
sacrifice religion... he needs to replace the point guard in his brain
I'm now saved (for the 1st time) because I have truly
seen the error of my ways (Need of a Saviour), repented to God, turned from all known sin, and have trusted in Jesus Christ's atoning
sacrifice as the only means of my salvation.
Come on get real samson old testement its in there wilful sin my definition is walking away from the Lord and doing opur own thing knowing what you should do but still do what you want to do.In the life of Samson WE
SEE Gods forgiveness and the sacrifice is the same as today repentence we are saved by the grace of God if we turn from our own way.He was disobedient to his parents and to the Lord his heart was no different from ours wilfully disobedient he chose sin over the Lord all the time sleeping with prostites and lying with foreign woman going his own way and yet God saves him not only that he was Gods chosen instrument to deliver his people.The sad part is his term was only 20 years if he had walking in the ways of the Lord he should have had that ministry for 40 years that is the term of completion.We cut ourselves short when we choose sin over the Lord which is an idol by the way.We all have those areas in our lives that we keep to ourselves thats wilful they are our demons and our comforters.Until we surrender all to the Lord we can not be overcomers and will be influenced by satan like samson it is clear warning to us wilful sin or making sin an idol in our lives has consequences better to serve the Lord with all our hearts even though samson did nt for much of his life God still showed him his grace and faithfullness.You can also see wilful sin in the Life of David yet God saves him but not all were saved in the life of saul as he wouldnt listen to the Lord and kept walking according to his fle
SEE Gods forgiveness and the
sacrifice is the same
as today repentence we are saved by the grace of God if we turn from our own way.He was disobedient to his parents and to the Lord his heart was no different from ours wilfully disobedient he chose sin over the Lord all the time sleeping with prostites and lying with foreign woman going his own way and yet God saves him not only that he was Gods chosen instrument to deliver his people.The sad part is his term was only 20 years if he had walking in the ways of the Lord he should have had that ministry for 40 years that is the term of completion.We cut ourselves short when we choose sin over the Lord which is an idol by the way.We all have those areas in our lives that we keep to ourselves thats wilful they are our demons and our comforters.Until we surrender all to the Lord we can not be overcomers and will be influenced by satan like samson it is clear warning to us wilful sin or making sin an idol in our lives has consequences better to serve the Lord with all our hearts even though samson did nt for much of his life God still showed him his grace and faithfullness.You can also
see wilful sin in the Life of David yet God saves him but not all were saved in the life of saul as he wouldnt listen to the Lord and kept walking according to his fle
see wilful sin in the Life of David yet God saves him but not all were saved in the life of saul
as he wouldnt listen to the Lord and kept walking according to his flesh.
The cross is certainly a many - sided event and symbol, and contexts alter meanings; but in our context at least, I believe, it should be
seen primarily, not
as a divinely managed human
sacrifice to a righteously wrathful God but
as God's own solidarity with the creature and the decisive statement of One who would be «with us» unreservedly.
Since the Syriac fathers
see the old order of
sacrifices as having lost its former value, it is curious how firmly both Aphrahat and Ephrem held a tradition which is strange to the New Testament, namely, that Christ
as High Priest «according to the order of Melchizedek», actually received the Aaronic priesthood by unbroken succession of imposition of hands through John the Baptist, who was of priestly family; when the former priesthood was repudiated, the power continued in Christ and he passed it on to the Apostles.
They took along with them four principal priests, who made their laws and instructed them in their rites, and ceremonies and in the most superstitious, cruel, and bloody
sacrifices ever known,
as will be
seen farther on in this account, where the
sacrifices are described in detail.
But when a person comes to
see the ordering of sex impulse
as a necessary means to serving a high good, the
sacrifice of gratification can become a source of well - being.
As we make our way through the Book of Hebrews with its glittering and sometimes confusing images of sacrifices and great high priests and its extended metaphor of Jesus as that priest who makes all other priests unnecessary, the following verses come to us with a remarkable clarity and freshness: «Let us hold fast the confession of our hope without wavering, for he who promised is faithful; and let us consider how to stir up one another to love and good works, not neglecting to meet together, as is the habit of some, but encouraging one another, and all the more as you see the Day drawing near.&raqu
As we make our way through the Book of Hebrews with its glittering and sometimes confusing images of
sacrifices and great high priests and its extended metaphor of Jesus
as that priest who makes all other priests unnecessary, the following verses come to us with a remarkable clarity and freshness: «Let us hold fast the confession of our hope without wavering, for he who promised is faithful; and let us consider how to stir up one another to love and good works, not neglecting to meet together, as is the habit of some, but encouraging one another, and all the more as you see the Day drawing near.&raqu
as that priest who makes all other priests unnecessary, the following verses come to us with a remarkable clarity and freshness: «Let us hold fast the confession of our hope without wavering, for he who promised is faithful; and let us consider how to stir up one another to love and good works, not neglecting to meet together,
as is the habit of some, but encouraging one another, and all the more as you see the Day drawing near.&raqu
as is the habit of some, but encouraging one another, and all the more
as you see the Day drawing near.&raqu
as you
see the Day drawing near.»
However, when we look at the book of Ezra — which takes place approximately a thousand years after God spoke to Moses, hundreds of years after many of the Psalms were written, and 400 years before Jesus Christ was born — we
see that Zahnd's theory is simply inaccurate,
as Israel reinstituted
sacrifices to God even before they began reconstructing the temple (Ezra 3).
Girard, however, fails to
see the richness, multivalency, and ambiguity inherent in the language of
sacrifice in Jewish and Christian thought; he fails to grasp, in particular, the conversion theology effects of the story of wrath into the story of mercy, or how it replaces the myth of
sacrifice as economy with the narrative of
sacrifice as a ceaseless outpouring of gift and restoration in an infinite motion exceeding every economy»
In fact, we might
see Eid Al Ahda and Rosh Hashanah
as far more advanced than the rest of the world precisely because these holidays call to consciousness this repressed but real tendency to pass on the pain that was done to us onto our children, and to remind us that the great spiritual leader Abraham was able to NOT DO IT, thereby giving us the message that we too need not
sacrifice our children either actually by supporting the war machine or symbolically by passing onto them various other forms of hurt, oppression and cruelty.
If the Eucharist is
seen as a memorial, a means to encourage recollection of Christ's
sacrifice, then a virtual memorial may do.
Individual
sacrifices on behalf of the community are
seen as an insurance policy: they will ensure that the individual will have a right to be helped by the community in the future.
Those who have been asked to live for others have been instructed to
see their subordination
as noble
sacrifice or, worse,
as merited punishment for sin.
Sorry to tell ya, but the Jews succeded in the death of Jesus... what I don't understand is your use of that
as a basis for hating Jews... You reveal your complete ignorance fo salvation... such
as without the death and resurrection of Jesus -LCB- which ceretainly did happen
as I am this day a witness of his resurrection -RCB-, there woudl be no asis for the gentiles for salvation... you
see his blood was shed for the atoning
sacrifice for the sins of all the world not just gentile but Jew
as well..
When we pay attention to the life of King
as a life of discipleship, we can
see that his assassination was also a willing
sacrifice of himself out of love for his enemies.
With God reduced to a shadow of the human other, and no longer
seen as the source of compensating heavenly rewards, the ultimate religious and ethical imperative of pure
sacrifice is therefore fulfilled within a secular and symbolically drained sphere, harboring no illusions.
He
sees the concern of the atomic scientists
as misguided, «a youthful philosophy, enthusiastic, idealistic, and colored by eagerness for self -
sacrifice.»
Fr Crean's article on the Eucharist (Sept 09) stresses the need to
see the
sacrifice of our Lord's mortal body
as the essential fact which makes the offering of the Mass a
sacrifice; and his thesis is usefully complemented by the editorial comment, which reminds us that «the presence of the Lamb that was slain for our sins is inseparable from his risen and glorified presence before the Father in heaven».
ARCHBISHOP RANJITH: When you look at the Old Testament, you
see that the people of Israel were born
as the expression of the Covenant and the
Sacrifice on Mount Sinai and the resultant experience of faith.
In Jesus» case it was a combination of factors — such
as the fervent longing of oppressed people, their religious preparation and ethical sensitivity, the remarkable personal power of Jesus, and the particular circumstances of his death — which produced among his followers a mental and emotional situation favorable to the attainment of a remarkable new intensity of life, marked by love, loyalty, courage and joy, all for the sake of the Master, who had
sacrificed his life for them and for the larger good he
saw through them.
One gathers from the Philippians passage,
as well
as from such sentences
as that quoted from II Corinthians, that far from being embarrassed by the normality of the earthly life, Paul
saw in it a sign of how much Christ had been willing to
sacrifice on our behalf.