Sentences with phrase «seen better acting»

Not exact matches

By forgoing endorsements, newspapers could better fulfill that role: They would be making a statement that news organizations provide impartial information - and readers should act on it as they see fit.

You see that Orphan Drug Act (and a confluence of other factors as well, both regulatory and economic) helped set the stage for the Wild West marketplace we have now, in which gun - slinging drug makers can charge into town and charge whatever the heck they want for their wares.

Since the FORM Act passed the House in 2015, there is a good chance we will see it resurrected in 2017.

No disrespect intended to Mick, who is a friend of mine, but seeing him onstage certainly shows how big a disconnect there can be between doing what you do best and acting your age.

We also want to see better media representation of all trans people, and amends to other legal documents like the Gender Recognition Act, to ensure that all trans and nonbinary people are adequately protected in law.»

And being a successful social - media act requires pricey overhead — those well - crafted videos you see are usually filled with props and homemade sets paid for out of the stars» pockets.

When customers see a business leader taking seriously the act of giving back, this is good for the company's mission, brand and workplace culture.

Now perhaps that response is justified because my portfolio is not well balanced or diversified but can you see why I would be looking around now to find a better fit for someone to act as steward for my nest egg?

We are also pleased to see that the CSA, IIROC and MFDA may view refusals or low ball offers as an indication of problems with a registered firm's complaint handling practices including their obligation to deal fairly, honestly and in good faith with clients, act within the applicable standard of care, or have implemented and maintained effective complaint handling procedures.

The performance of a coin might not continue in the same state for a long time, so it would be best if you can observe first and see what will happen before finally deciding to act in order to avoid pulling your profits down.

As we've seen from the Honest Ads Act, a bill proposed late last year to better regulate online political ads, any regulation will likely take time, and Facebook is already trying to get ahead of potential rules it might one day be forced to follow.

And the best way to play your hand is to face reality — see the world the way it is — and act accordingly.

It's a good idea to speak to your insurance agent to see if there is an umbrella policy available that will cover acts of nature.

«They [rulers] must act like a good physician who, when gangrene has set in proceeds without mercy to cut, saw, and burn flesh, veins, bone, and marrow.

NOW YOU KNOW WHAT ORWELLIAN UNITED STATES CONGRESS (USSR # 2 which consists of lawyers or what are liars and physicians as well as family member of health efected individuals... Why lawyers!!? So crime per physicians OR WHAT IS HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION can get away with it) AND OTHER GOVERNMENTS WORLDWIDE ARE SOOO BUSY WITH WHEN PLAYING / CLOWNING (acting) IN FRONT OF CAMERAS ONLY HOW SOMETHING HAVE TO BE DONE (deliberately omitting / delaying facts of genocide as seen on this complain) NO DIFFERENT FROM ROMNEY»S FATHER WHO EXCELLED AFTER GM WAS DELIBERATELY SCREWED / BANKRUPT (LIKE AMERICA TODAY = success based on deliberate sabotage = known as grand treason)!!!

It's only by convincing his followers that his immoral acts are moral that you come to believe that we are somehow misunderstanding gods evil acts and that if we only read the bible again we'd somehow see that when he killed all the first born of egypt, or impregnated a married woman and left her with a kid or that he's fine with slavery under certain conditions as good things.

its not really atheism or religion that I have a problem with, its the hate, control, and fear that goes along with it that I have a problem with, you say that those who are spiritual are into new agey, crystal ball, stuff, see that's what I'm talking about, you assume to know what something is about when you don't understand something you naturally fear it, your self righteous clouds you, don't you get that by being narrow minded in your view towards things, you really act no better than religious fundamentalists, being spiritual is a lot more than just the new agey, think positive all the time that you think it is, its about being aware of who you are?

Everyone see now what people say to their face are good, and yet, when they get into office on the Hill, they act as if they don't know you anyomore.

Later, in the story of cain and Bale, we see te issue of good and eveil acted out in a more realistic, less mythic framework.

But she saw that he was not ready to act and that it would do no good to push him.

I'm not saying that those of us who see the rabbit are better or smarter than those who don't, I'm just saying that, for me, doubt is not some concerted act of the will that I can suddenly stop.

For this reason, and well aware of the seriousness of this act, with full freedom I declare that I renounce the ministry of Bishop of Rome, Successor of Saint Peter, entrusted to me by the Cardinals on 19 April 2005, in such a way, that as from 28 February 2013, at 20:00 hours, the See of Rome, the See of Saint Peter, will be vacant and a Conclave to elect the new Supreme Pontiff will have to be convoked by those whose competence it is.

I liked this article... it's good to get things out in the open to see how Mormons act in the workplace and government.

Rarely can we say that this act is essentially good and that act is the manifestation of sin; though we can see objectively the self - destruction resulting from sin and we can experience in part the fulfilment of created goodness.

after losing friends and all our safety personnel and the consideration of the families i see no good coming from this and only animousity and ill feelings and betrayal by our public officials in asllowing this to happen... it is deplorable and an insult to the 3,000 dead and the thousands affected by this horrible act and time must pass to heal the wounds before the issue is even discussed.

The problem I have with this obvious at a propaganda campaign lifting up a religeous secotr of our (US) society will danerously feed people's ignorance in this country, to the fact that the WORLD does not see US Muslims as «good» Muslims and that a majority of Muslims WORLDWIDE act or behave in this manner.

For instance, when these characteristics are perceived as exhibited in an individual enduringly and in a sense in which these are understood to affect the world around in a favorable fashion — either in an objective sense of effecting something concrete outside such a person [like effecting healing, foretelling, acting as medium in a non-rational manner or simply doing good or saying good to help the people selflessly], exhibiting personal traits, conditions and states which are known to be «abnormal» [like going into trances, hearing voices, seeing visions, or just the simple unconventional behavior, which proceed from such an individual's horizon to affect, influence, impact others» horizons]-- or is subjectively perceived to be extra-ordinary — such an individual is said to be godly, god - bearing, pious or saintly.

I understand and agree with you Toby, however Christians and other religion were not the only ones who carried out acts of violence, Atheists famous people did as well, You see it doesn't matter if your a believer or not, people are imperfect and we created an imperfect world because of our imperfections.

You see humans can categorize good and evil acts based on certain key components.

In order for us to address these problems (and others not listed) we must move the culture in a direction that sees the procreation of children as a good thing and as an expected outcome of the act — even if it does not occur as a result of each and every act.

Moreover, Pope John Paul II clearly teaches in Veritatis splendor that «the communion of persons in marriage,» violated by every act of adultery, «is a fundamental human good» (nos. 13, 48; see also nos. 50, 67, 78, 79).

The major need was to understand the situation well enough to see what the implications of such a belief are and then motivate people to act as they recognized they should.

It is necessary that we think of the Bible as a record of the mighty acts of God, and it may well be understood as a drama, the five acts being Creation, Covenant, Christ, Church, Consummation (See my Biblical theology and Christian Education [New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1956]-RRB-.

Christological exegesis, when applied to the Old Testament, often takes the form of typological exegesis in which the acts of God in Old Testament history as well as the prophecies of his servants are seen to have their fulfillment in Jesus Christ.

When we do this, we see that it can have various applications in various contexts, but ultimately, it is about helping the values and goals of God take root in our personal lives so that we live and act in way toward others which helps them come to experience God's values and goals in their life as well.

The church split certainly became a defining moment of my spiritual life as I unhappily bounced between churches for the last 9 years, praying all along to see an official forgiveness session, watching with hope as small acts of kindness mended some wounds... noting as well how others remained gaping obviously.

Well, you see, despite the way God was acting with the whole flood thing, God actually loves mankind and had a plan to save everyone whom he chose to be saved.

Although the sophistication with which Wagner plots out this conflict exists on many levels, it can perhaps be seen best in his treatment of the famous «hymn to Venus» that Tannhäuser introduces in the first act.

And if you read the story of the good Samaritan with this in mind, you can easy see, that is not only a story about how to act but also a critique on the scapegoating what the Levit and the Priest was probably doing, when they let the poor guy rot to death («ya know, it would make me unclean to help, the guy probably had it coming, I better serve the Lord»).

Many times we learned that they were acting in our best interests after all, though we didn't see it at the time.

Are we not to act so that others «may see [our] good works and give glory to [our] Father who is in heaven» (Matt.

On a more serious side, I have do have a problem believing in a personal God who supposedly has my best interests in mind — especially when I see thousands of certainly devout Christians rendered homeless by tornados, or dozens randomly killed by so - called «acts of God.»

But if that's so, he notes, then it should govern the way Christians think about same - sex sexual activity as well, and thus he concludes: «When those with homosexual orientation act on their desires in a loving, committed relationship, [they] are not, as far as I can see, violating the love command.»

While in its superficial and exploitative moments it wanted to wipe away the category of sexual sin («If it feels good, do it»), in its better moments it helped us see that sexual sin is really something different from, and more than, particular acts which can be neatly defined.

It is now my intention to draw out from the story of Abraham the dialectical consequences inherent in it, expressing them in the form of problemata, in order to see what a tremendous paradox faith is, a paradox which is capable of transforming a murder into a holy act well pleasing to God, a paradox which gives Isaac back to Abraham, which no thought can master, because faith begins precisely there where thinking leaves off.

It is not at all inappropriate to see God's hesed as underlying the very act of initial as well as continuing creation.

(Emerson writes: «When we see a soul whose acts are regal, graceful, and pleasant as roses, we must thank God that such things can be and are, and not turn sourly on the angel and say: Crump is a better man, with his grunting resistance to all his native devils.»

I wept because I had been made to see, for the first time, that all the justice that must be shown the black man, all the help given him, everything that should be done legally to give him his rights, will never do what a simple act of love can do: make him know that he is accepted, cared for, yes, really loved by those who do not just «do good to him» but who feel with passionate concern that he is a human brother.

From an atheistic perspective, it is absurd, unreasonable, and irrational to anonymously give to charity because there is no one and no God to see your «good» act, so why give to anyone who can't return the favor in some way?

As Christians and churches, we must see as an act of God's grace and forgiveness as well as a call to discipleship and commitment that we — who many times have been indifferent to the suffering of the poor, or allied with their domination — are allowed to join in the struggle for justice.