Not exact matches
The novice and seasoned
geologists from the University of Rochester have gone out with the eye trackers about four times a day over their two - week field trip across California, which took them from San Francisco
by the San Andreas Fault through the snowy Sierra Nevada near Yosemite National Park to the harshest area of the U.S. «Death Valley is a great place, where one can really
see active geology firsthand — forces that are shaping the crust of the earth,» says geophysicist John A. Tarduno, another of the Rochester scientists.
Years later, a
geologist saw a sample of this feature sitting on his colleague's desk and was intrigued
by its spaghetti like nature.
Providing the key geo - logical concepts of context and sequence, without which the animals were so many cherries without a cake, the scheme is well explained
by Peter Doyle and Eric Robinson's complementary (and,
by Sod's law, near - simultaneous) article (Proceedings of the
Geologists» Association, vol 104, pp 181 - 194) which gives much fuller references than the book's skimpy listing (
see also vol 106, pp 71 - 78).
So the National Center for Science Education decided to put together a raft trip, there's only one each summer, which for a little bit, they'll discuss what the creationists
see, how they interpret what they're
seeing, and then there's a
geologist on board, fellow
by the name of Steve Newton, and there's an evolutionary biologist who makes the trip, Josh Rozanow, and they will talk about various things that we're looking at from the scientific perspective.
And planetary
geologists had
seen signs in the moon's surface lavas that indicate that its 100 known volcanic hot spots are fed
by a deep magma «ocean.»
Some tools used
by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection include ground - penetrating radar and electrical imaging, which allow
geologists to look at the physical properties of the underlying earth strata to
see if there is empty space there.
Geologists suggest that the features they
see were created
by flowing water at a time when Mars was warmer than it is now.
For the purpose of this study, a team of
geologists from the Nanjing University, China, and the University of Illinois studied the echoes generated
by seismic waves produced during earthquakes to scan below the surface of Earth, much like an ultrasound is used to
see inside patients.
These claims were subsequently disputed in an article in Eos (Rahmstorf et al, 2004)
by an international team of scientists and
geologists (including some of us here at RealClimate), who suggested that Shaviv and Veizer's analyses were based on unreliable and poorly replicated estimates, selective adjustments of the data (shifting the data, in one case
by 40 million years) and drew untenable conclusions, particularly with regard to the influence of anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations on recent warming (
see for example the exchange between the two sets of authors).
Meteorologists, physicists,
geologists, observational climatologists, etc. know the scientific method when they
see it and are appalled when it is violated
by warming researchers adjusting the facts to fit their conclusions.
On BP and its conversion (reportedly spurred
by a memo from a staff
geologist)
see Lovell (2012).
«German
Geologist: IPCC Models A Failure, «Have No Chance Of Success»...
Sees Possible 0.2 °C Of Cooling
By 2020,» NoTricksZone, June 29, 2014.
I have to post this, partly because I am a
geologist by profession and can immediately
see a huge number of logical inconsistencies in the report and partly just for the «WTF?»