Sentences with phrase «seen by scientists»

Growing local produce could cut carbon emissions, seen by scientists as a key cause of global warming, by reducing the need for trucks to deliver vegetables from long distances.

By the way, monsoon cyclones are mostly seen by scientists as unaffected by climate change, which has so far not caused perceptible long - term increases in their frequency or intensity.

But there are many more that haven't been named or even seen by scientists yet.

The new virus, officially known as Mimivirus (because it mimics a bacterium), is a creature «so bizarre,» as The London Telegraph described it, «and unlike anything else seen by scientists... that... it could qualify for a new domain in the tree of life.»

And several of the coral diseases have never before been seen by scientists, according to marine ecologist James Porter of the University of Georgia, Athens, who spoke today at the Smithsonian Institution's National Museum of American History.

And like everyone, Ozzy carries several hundred thousand variants that have never been seen by scientists.

Not exact matches

The scientists were even able to see «intriguing» shadows cast by clouds of gas and dust in two of the images.

While the work there was classified, scientists were reportedly trying to invent a nuclear - powered airplane by exposing military equipment to radiation to see if it could hold up.

Educated professionals like scientists and architects could use their skills more productively, while many less - educated workers, like bank tellers and travel agents, saw their jobs being displaced by technology.6 This led to bigger employment shares for high - and low - skilled jobs at the expense of middle - skilled jobs in Canada, along with a modest increase in income inequality.7

Atheists: I know many there are many people that practice religion just by fanaticism, I've seen many people in my opinion stupid (excuse the word) praying to saints hopping to solve their problems by repeating pre-made sentences over and over, but there are others different, I don't think Religion and Science need to be opposites, I believe in God, I'm Catholic and I have many reasons to believe in him, I don't think however that we should pray instead of looking for the cause and applying a solution, Atheists think they are smart because they focus on Science and technology instead of putting their faith in a God, I don't think God will solve our problems, i think he gave us the means to solve them by ourselves that's were God is, also I think that God created everything but not as a Magical thing but stablishing certain rules like Physics and Quimics etc. he's not an idiot and he knew how to make it so everything was on balance, he's the Scientist of Scientist the Mathematic of Mathematics, the Physician of Physicians, from the tiny little fact that a mosquito, an insect species needs to feed from blood from a completely different species, who created the mosquitos that way?

The muslim countries were invaded and have been ruled by many thieves and you can see that clear today in the mideast uprising; I hope once liberated we can see a more prosperous and educated and nobel scientists come from there.

When we can move beyond our primitive beliefs and theories in both science and religion and see these disorders for what they truly are, then they can be confronted by the scientists, the priests and those afflicted in an intelligent and effective manner.

Other qualified scientists with no vested interest in seeing a given theory succeed or fail attempt to find flaws in the methodologies described in the source paper by replicating the processes themselves to see if they get the same results.

ESCR scientists are mounting a furious political assault against the lawsuit, currently back in Royce Lamberth's court urging that human embryonic stem cell research continue to be funded by the Feds, hoping to pressure the judge to see it their way.

they are working bodies of knowledge and discoveries based on experimentation and research which is then checked by a scientists peers to see if its reporducable or re-observable..

Although I didn't see the video, going by the ti.tle, Alexander Tsiaras isn't a scientist; he's a photographer and journalist...

Since no one has yet to SEE an atom, the idea of the structure of the atom can only be inferred by experimental evidence — yet I see no Republican trying to stop teaching the structure of the atom in school — oh that's right, its because major corporations and industries rely on this science (pharm, weapons manufacturers etc etc) whereas the theory of evolution is merely think piece of scientists on how life on Earth changes over tiSEE an atom, the idea of the structure of the atom can only be inferred by experimental evidence — yet I see no Republican trying to stop teaching the structure of the atom in school — oh that's right, its because major corporations and industries rely on this science (pharm, weapons manufacturers etc etc) whereas the theory of evolution is merely think piece of scientists on how life on Earth changes over tisee no Republican trying to stop teaching the structure of the atom in school — oh that's right, its because major corporations and industries rely on this science (pharm, weapons manufacturers etc etc) whereas the theory of evolution is merely think piece of scientists on how life on Earth changes over time.

Similarly, in the early modern period, most people, including most scientists, saw the cosmos as a very complex machine that was obviously made by a powerful mind of enormous intelligence.

Although most mainstream scientists see it as Creationism by any other name, it is entirely possible that ID will soon find its way into school curricula.

The rejection of metaphysics by most modern philosophers and theologians has seen the gap filled by influential scientists, often with little philosophical training but with the credibility that their status as scientists confers on them.

One sees from Gingerich's absorbing narratives the extent to which scientists are sometimes guided by philosophical ideas.

i enjoy surfing through new published works by various scientists expanding my mind based on their findings; and tying some of their findings just to see how it worked.

Most of my points came from this article, if you wish to see our point of reason, supported by atheist scientists.

@hawaiiguest I believe I made my original point that the evolutionist are the more close minded of the two camps because they only trust what they can see or has been proven by «scientist» Scientist or the progressives of their age once thought the earth scientist» Scientist or the progressives of their age once thought the earth Scientist or the progressives of their age once thought the earth was flat.

Scientists who study within the 2 variants of Space, One being Outer and the other being Inner are slowed to rationalize with right - minded fidelity, that Inner Space and Outer Space are but the sameness yet their Sizes of these Spaces are seen only by the material that one sees.

The Pope's emphasis is a common approach, followed in varying degrees by Cardinals Dulles, Ruini and Schonborn (see our May issue) and by the prominent Christian scientists featured in the Faraday Institute's interesting new resource described in our Cutting Edge column.

What it does, by including scientists, is say «Nothing can help us see the truth here.»

He sees the concern of the atomic scientists as misguided, «a youthful philosophy, enthusiastic, idealistic, and colored by eagerness for self - sacrifice.»

We shall see that the scientist limits himself professionally to certain aspects of the problem, and therefore can not pretend that his description is complete... The natural scientist confines himself in his description of the world to the objective data which he can obtain by the observation of nature.4

It was fascinating, and I think important, to see the development over the centuries of the philosophical rift which eventually grew between science and religion, as a result of which many scientists (although by no means all) abandoned any idea of a Creator God.

The social significance of Christian anti-Judaism in the United States has been well established by contemporary social scientists (see CBAS and WS).

See the book The Science of the Soul for written statements by prominent scientists such as Stephen Hawking, Albert Einstein, Erwin Schrodinger, Charles Darwin and others.

Yes, I saw that statement to which you refer, recently issued by the Federation of American Scientists.

It is precisely here that the scientists I have mentioned have been most impressed by process thinking, for they also see such an analogy running through the order of nature and they find that the use of that analogy is valuable to them in their work.

See Andrew Morrison, «Mass Media Use by Adults,» American Behavioral Scientist, September / October 1979, pp. 71 - 93; Frederick Williams, Herbert Dordick, and Frederick Horstmann, «Where Citizens Go for Information,» Journal of Communication, Winter 1977, pp. 95 - 99.

Boyle Lecture 2005 2004 saw the revival of the Boyle Lecture series, which originated in 1691 by a legacy from the celebrated scientist and Christian, Robert Boyle.

For a recent example of narrative method employed by a social Scientist see Robert N. Bellah et al., Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985).

While some still object to cells being taken from animals and used by scientists to grow clean meat in laboratories — and some just don't like the idea of eating a «cultured» steak created by men and women in white coats — others see the lab - grown meat revolution as key to solving the environmental crisis linked to meat eating.

This all began one day, when I decided to make meditation a daily practice; to really see the benefits it provides as it has been claimed by spiritual guru's, and recently by neuro - scientists all across the globe.

I met this scientist, and I asked her that what her research is shows, is that if you took a Victorian era man (used to women in total dress, getting turned on by ankles and so on), that they would see our society as pornographic in nature, they would see the way women dress as we would see Youporn or whatever.

Kids will love diving into a replica of Woodstock's nest and seeing specimens of other birds and nests, playing inside a massive Great Pumpkin («It's not like the pumpkin you'll carve at Halloween,» Miller says), and getting answers to their scientific queries at Lucy's Psychiatry Booth, which is staffed by museum scientists.

After deciding not to contest the Dome / Kwabenya seat in 2012, many saw that decision by the Political Scientist who is also a legal luminary as the right opportunity to prepare himself for the Speaker position if the NPP wins power.

This can be seen starkly in the results of a new study, published in the journal Drug Test Analysis and carried out by scientists at King's College London.

Adapting Dean's negotiability dimension to the climate discussion space, we can see that participation may be on issues that are decided by «elites» (whether scientists, politicians, or professional communicators) or are negotiated by all of the participants.

In a video posted on his official Assembly website, Hanna is seen debating a bill on the floor and decrying a «conspiracy» by scientists who engage in climate research to «suppress» research conducted by those who challenge the existence of global warming.

This is a time when some «see science as a threat either to their profit margins or their beliefs can not stand up against the momentum,» Biden said, urging scientists to defend the advances made by the scientific enterprise.

When the «Sagan Effect» strikes scientists popular to the general public, they are perceived by their colleagues as less serious, and their work is seen as less rigorous.

(Scientists will have to wait for improved instruments and another eclipse to see how these wavelengths are distorted by the magnetic field.)

I saw presentations in many fields by renowned visiting scientists and scientists from my uni that had recently been awarded tenure.Lunch was not crazy, just some simple sandwiches, juices and fruit.

Creativity, Genius and the Brain [October 27, 2015] Scientists often cite Isaac Newton when crediting the work of others who have come before them: If I have seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants.