For a reality check we spoke to Howard Herzog, senior research engineer with the MIT Energy Initiative, and asked where he's actually
seen carbon capture technology working in a big way?
Not exact matches
Girding myself for potentially indecipherable jokes, I'm here to
see Lackner's potentially world - saving
technology: a plastic resin that can
capture carbon dioxide directly from the air.
By the 2040s, the Blueprints world
sees renewable energy
technologies compete on price against fossil fuels, which are well managed with
carbon capture and storage.
While ensuring the widespread deployment of
carbon capture / storage
technology does represent a significant challenge, it is more feasible than other policy options being offered by those who simply don't
see any role for coal in our energy future.
(
See «Scaling up
carbon dioxide
capture and storage: From megatons to gigatons,» a 2009 paper by Howard J. Herzog at the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology, for just one of many sobering takes on what's needed.)
I don't
see a agronomic
technology in his talk that would exceed the
carbon capture of preindustrial grasslands.
But without a substantial boost in basic research and development and large - scale demonstration projects related to
technologies like mass energy storage,
capturing and storing
carbon dioxide, grid management and a new generation of nuclear plants, it's hard to
see timely progress.
While renewables will play an important part, they must be
seen as part of a portfolio of low emissions energy
technologies (including nuclear, renewables and
carbon capture and storage) that deliver increased energy efficiency.
«What we've
seen here today is really a quantum step in implementation of
technology that is able to
capture carbon from the atmosphere and put it into use or
capture it for good and store it.
As recently as the Stern Review in 2006,
carbon capture and storage from coal - fired power stations was
seen as the most promising clean energy
technology on offer.
Adding
carbon and
capture technology to new coal plants makes electricity from coal more expensive than energy from solar thermal and wind power, even when «firming costs» are included for alternatives (
see table).
If
carbon capture technologies are
seen as more broadly applicable and more important for the fight against climate change, it is more likely that these
technologies will get greater research funding.