Sentences with phrase «seen evidence like»

Not exact matches

While, fresh but scaling startups tend to drag their feet until they see clear evidence of issues, prolonging upgrading may cause unnecessary and costly headaches like missed billing opportunities, inventory write - offs, efficiency gaps in operations or even fraud.
Get Specific About Foreign Subsidies: Though government activism isn't widely seen as effective in Republican circles, there's plenty of evidence that trade policy has at the very least boosted employment in countries like China and Korea.
«He has only been there a year and has been putting his team in place... It's hard to fix a discrete time frame, but over the next 12 months — heading into the 2017 budget — you would like to see some hard evidence that it's working.»
As to whether the stock market has put in a «real» bottom, Reynolds said he would like to see corroborating evidence of improving conditions, like the yield on the 10 - year U.S. Treasury note moving back up, and improvement in the investment - grade corporate credit market.
Like most businesses — and indeed marketers — they didn't see Brexit coming and they still don't seem to understand the effectiveness of the media they use, as evidenced by Radiocentre's recent «Re-evaluating Media» report.
Despite these challenges, we see evidence that employers have tried to limit job cuts as much as possible through initiatives like work - share arrangements, and want to retain their staff in anticipation of future growth.
It's the religious that remain closed minded and refuse to see evidence, like evolution
That is, if we had souls they would not likely be «supernatural» or extra-dimensional since we see absolutely NO evidence of anything like that in physics at all.
You said, «I would like to see ANY evidence to support your argument that there's no God.
no apparent evidence of ill - will, and 3)... an experience of unity.Now, David, I haven't known you for very long (blogwise), but I respect what I have read from yr deep and thoughtful spirit, so with that in mind, I just don't see how this personal experience is translatable or cd be used as some kind of template when faced with the real Wal - Mart world.Do we not, like Jesus, show out true colours under pressure.Maybe I'm missing something... please correct me If I am and remember, I'm not into boob jobs (cleavage enhancement)
I don't see any evidence that your belief that covering medications like birth control will bring us to our knees.
I would like to see ANY evidence to support your argument that there's no God.
Evidence shows them to have been like the mid-eastern peoples with enough genetic differentiation content in their DNA to eventually generate the different nationalities we see today which actually did not happen until after the flood.
I call BS on Jimbo about «a huge avalanche of historical evidence and archeology» and I call BS on your statement because you only refer to «common knowledge» I've seen what Christian common knowledge is like and it often runs a bit shy on facts..
They are playing tricks with your mind so you don't see or care about evidence like this so they plan horrible things behind the curtain while people get upset over conterceptives you can still get.
Okay I would like to see the evidence for that as well please.
I've seen evidence of you being hostile, just like the Christians.
God could make himself as obvious as gravity (since he made gravity as obvious as he made gravity), but he doesn't, and so there's no way to determine whether or not god exist and we continue to debate him without any solid proof or meaningful evidence (like we see in biology and chemistry and such).
I'd like to see the creationists accept there is overwhelming evidence evolution is occuring.
Your evidence is No where near conclusive, its like me saying «So i saw a cow on the beach today so cows must love the beach» its childish in logic.
It may be a claim like the one you have made that you have seen evidence of your God.
Whatever is consisted with being an Atheist, i would like your community to provide us collaborating evidences that if we follow you that we will live in a better place with no wars and other bad things that we are seeing in this world.
Even though the religious often mock things like evolution I really don't see why we need to sink to their level of argument, especially when we have the evidence on our side to support our arguments, right?
Like I said, I haven't seen any evidence that he was ever an atheist, simply that he came to despise Christianity.
When the fossil record does not provide the evidence that naturalism would like to see, it is the fossil record, and not the naturalistic explanation, that is judged to be inadequate.
It would be like always taking the word of the last person to see someone alive as factual evidence of their demise.
Believers like to avoid the real issue of evidence but they like to use words like «see» to imply that there is some sort of empirical proof, when really, they mean «believe».
The believer can SEE what the materialist sees (like the voluminous amount of evolutionary evidence), but he either refuses to believe what he sees, or he doesn't UNDERSTAND it, and so discounts it.
I saw something on the History Channel (I think) recently that presented scientific evidence that this event potentially coincided with a big meteor shower (or something similar - I admit my memory of this show is not as detailed as I would like, but is essentially accurate).
Dale, your «creator» created the universe to make it look like he didn't do so, at least as seen by sincere people looking honestly at the evidence.
See they can teach evolution in schools, not due it being a conspiracy against the poor persecuted christards like you but due to it being based on solid acceptable evidence... regardless of how stupid you may wish to continue to be on the subject, you don't change the facts.
What if there is evidence of God out there but atheists are like stubborn ignorant children who don't want to see it?
Justified belief — like Thomas or John you saw and touched the resurrected Christ, or you believe on the basis of some evidence that to you seems incontrovertible?
belief in anything without supporting evidence is a childrens game... We teach our children not to lie, judge a book by its cover, or to take anything at face value or to just believe without questioning... you know, we say stuff like check the source and don't believe everything you see / hear... should we teach seeking knowledge or to have faith in without?
Like the unknown author of Epistle to the Hebrews, they know that,»... faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen
While it is evident to science that there is a functional «teleonomy» or machine - like purposiveness in individual organisms (for example, the fish's eye is constructed so as to enable it to see under water, the heart toward pumping blood, the human brain toward problem - solving, etc.), still there is no hard evidence that life itself, terrestrial evolution or the universe as a whole has any overarching meaning.
No where did I see any evidence of «censorship» of those who didn't accept polywater like you seem to be claiming.
We've all seen it and I'm sure someone can post a link if you'd like evidence.
Scroll up and down and you can see atheists embracing utter nonsense (like the horus nonsense), not because there is evidence for it, but because they feel it supports their position.
You take science, then find a place to inject your god without reason or evidence, instead of actually being intellectually honest you take the bits of evidence you like and say «See goddidit».
We saw cases like McCleskey in 1987 where the Court upheld the death penalty despite overwhelming evidence of racial bias.
Also I would love to see all these Atheists «forcing their religion on the rest of us» You know like creating laws to limit your rights, creating groups to silence and limit the freedoms and expressions simply because they believe didn't from you, that thing we call evidence and proof, can you provide any?
There is a third answer that most people ignore, «I don't know but I see no reason to act like there is a god until more than cultural myths are provided as evidence
You mean like when you see the sun rise you see evidence of a majestic God - or a revolving earth.
I applaud Atheists for their challenging Christians for their beliefs, but there is a completely untapped source of evidence against the existence of their God... the daily life of the Christian (as can be seen to a small extent in a blog like this.
Philosopher God is without sin that is his who he is the evidence is that Jesus was like the father and he was without sin when God created satan it wasnt with evil intent just like us he had the choice to be obedient or to be disobedient to Gods word.He chose by his own volition to be disobedient and here we see the seeds of sin or lawlessness.
From idiots like that guy at SNAP, whose goal in life is to see how much money he can bilk out of the Church, after «suddenly remembering» something that happened forty years ago without any evidence?
Some studies have found early evidence of fish farming in China as far back as 3500 B.C.. But, looking at today's worldwide population trends, it is easy to see why a company like InnovaSea Systems could have a very bright future.
I will re-evaluate my opinion if I ever see a piece of evidence to say Wenger doesn't like spending rather than Silent Stan doesn't like spending.
This is clear evidence why the BPL is so hard to win, any team can beat any team on a good day we must respect all our opponents because every game is difficult like we saw yesterday against Palace!
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z