Sentences with phrase «seen huge pay»

The top 5 % who have the marketing behind them will see a huge pay increase.

Not exact matches

If it is a huge opportunity (see above) it may be worth it to pay for some assistance so that I can take the project on, even if I'm not getting paid.

Many homeowners feel uncomfortable with their mortgage debt and see it as a huge psychological benefit to pay down their mortgages as quickly as possible.

Instead of seeing all these IPOs on Wall Street where Wall Street takes a huge fee, we're starting to see this new phenomenon referred to as Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) which are these businesses coming out and not paying fees to Wall Street, but coming out and issuing a coin, almost like a crowdfunding where people that put money in get a coin which inherently is a piece of the system.

If you pay attention, you'll probably see that accessibility (i.e. the path of least resistance) is already huge part of your decision making process.

Seeing the huge cash balance, many investors have urged Apple to begin issuing a dividend to make itself a more attractive investment, especially to large mutual funds that are focused on stocks that pay regular dividends.

People duped by Ponzi schemes couldn't really see themselves as gullible when they get paid a huge return and consequently reinvest.

Let them run down their contracts and put a poor performance in their last year of contract and see who's wiling to pay huge salaries for them.

Obviously, aside from the huge social and financial commitment needed to set up the infrastructure, re-profile roads, re-lay Tarmac, fit miles of Armco, build grandstands, pay for race - hosting fees and gain approval and sign - off from the FIA, we don't see any barriers to our vision.

However, I could see Dez taking a huge pay cut to stick it to Dallas.

If Aguero isn't happy with that scenario, then it remains to be seen if terms can be agreed with an interested party, although they will surely not want to pay such a huge fee for a player who turns 29 this summer.

He would have to be wooed and awed by a massive wage / contract in order to leave and at 32, it is hard to see a top team paying huge wages to a center back who had two years of top flight experience.

As we saw last year, home - field advantage at CenturyLink Field could pay huge dividends for the Seahawks.

Up front we have a few world - class players surrounded by some serious pretenders... Sanchez is by far the most accomplished player in our attack but the controversy surrounding his contractual mishandling could see him go before the window closes or most definitely by season's end... obviously a mistake by both parties involved, as Sanchez's exploits have never been more on display than in North London, but the club's irresponsible wage structure and lack of real intent have been the real undoing in this mess... Lacazette, who I think has some world - class skills as a front man, will only be as good as the players and system around him, which is troubling due to our current roster and Wenger's love of sideways passing... Walcott should have been sold years ago, enough said, and Welbeck should never have been brought in from the get - go... both of these players have suffered numerous injuries over their respective careers and neither are good enough to overcome such difficulties: not to mention, they both are below average first - touch players, which should be the baseline test for any player coming to a Wenger - led Arsenal team... Perez should have been played wide left or never purchased at all; what a huge waste of time and money, which is ridiculous considering our penny pinching ways and the fact that fans had been clamoring for a real striker for years... finally Giroud, the fact that he stills wears the jersey is a direct indictment of this club's failure to get things right... this isn't necessarily an attack on Giroud because I think he has some highly valued skills, but not for a team that has struggled to take their sideways soccer to the next level, as his presence slows their game even more, combined with our average, at best, finishing skills... far too often those in charge have either settled or chosen half - measures and ultimately it is us that suffer because no matter what happens Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke will always make more money whereas we will always be the ones paying for their mistakes... so every time someone suggests we should just shut - up and support the team just think of all the sacrifices you've made along the way and simply reply... f *** off

Yes it is a huge gamble but imagine the payoff — If wenger's tactics, team management and luck with injuries is spot on we could be about to see one of if not the most successful year since we finished paying off for the stadium.

What they're not going to pay to see is overzealous assistant (yes assistant) referees making huge decisions that deprive us of goals.

SEE ALSO: New Man United away shirt leaked # 30m from Chelsea despite being sacked... now Man United could pay Mourinho for doing nothing too Man United ready to splash huge cash on 31 - goal superstar whose price has increased by # 22m in 12 months

See I don't like the idea of walking on egg shells, for a player that we pay huge salary every week, will the three people you mentioned beat him?

Emirates stadium and huge sponsor deals we finally have had two poor years by his standards at the helm we always havent been so great and are we weak supporters or strong give him a contract i mean hes won with ants for money let him spend for once cause even if we do get new manager inflation has occured and no body else will win with the small amounts we gave him to spend and in 20 years actuall more it seems the club is finally willing to spend give him a contract let him spend and if we do nt improve which i think we will i think that the club is finally willing to spend shows were on an upturn because as long as top four the owner and board weren't and after we spend big or somewhat big for once and auba and mkhitaryan arent the big im hoping for i want more if liverpoodlians can pay 75million for a cb let wenget spend a bit and if we still do bad we can always sack him or ask him to leave wouldnt be uncommon but we owe it to him and do nt say we do not because emirates london colney that will bring in high talent here for years to come and we have never spent for him just gave little and hes always done big things with little i think he can do bigger things in his final years if we give him big i do nt see us in decline but if we sack him we will be for a good three maybe four years

they get paid huge money and to see their level of unprofessionalism to day was unforgiveable.

We just keep protecting this player forgetting that he is paid huge sums to do his work, we tend to look at his performances for the German team and that's simply no excuse, you don't see Ronaldo and Messi giving excuses about the team around them, a good player is a good player barring his team mates..

Would be interesting to see what another manager could do with him, but I don't he's worth the huge pay raise Campbell — Seems surplus to requirements, although I like him Sanchez — Looks as if he's definitely leaving, but if we could could get Simeone or Sampaoli, then maybe they could persuade him to stay (as long as he signs a new contract) Giroud — Decent backup striker, but not much else.

For some reason I saw him as something of a respectable character but a huge pay increase seems to have been the deciding factor.

The change didn't exactly see the team come out blazing in the second half, but it would pay huge dividends later on.

Zapata — I have seen Udinese a few times this season, and he is a promising youngster with all the right attributes to be a success — at 21 he is now captain — but paying anymore than Arsene has allegedly offered would be a huge gamble.

Manchester United Manager Sir Alex Ferguson heaped praise on Lampard saying: «Frank Lampard is an exceptional player - a huge asset to Chelsea, You pay attention to players who can get goals from midfield and he's been averaging 20 a season.You don't see him getting into stupid tackles or making a habit of becoming involved in silly rows.

Fellaini, on the other hand, continues to look completely out of his depth at United; either we will keep him and throw him on with 10 minutes to go every now and then, or we will take a huge loss on the fee we paid for him, as I really can't see anyone paying more than # 10 million for the bumbling Belgian.

In recent months we have seen Harriet Harman try to secure the right for MPs to spend our money on what they like and not tell us about it and government MPs continue to ask for over infl ation pay rises and huge increases in allowances, while at the same time tightening the screw on low paid public servants and jobless people on benefits.

See ya Danks, just don't waste your own money on this, let DeBlasio fund you, that way you wont have huge debts to pay off in December.

No, it's not when you get to the polling booth, twizzling a sweaty pencil in your disillusioned palm, trying to decide where to put your cross of disappointment, when you suddenly have to pay # 2 extra for huge, black - rimmed glasses to see the whole sorry process in three dimensions.

Clegg was confident, pleasing the crowd, and giving us a more specific message about the Lib Dems in coalition — the behind - the - scenes bloopers we didn't see, rather than the standard boring trope of rattling off what they have achieved (but don't worry, taking «3 million people on low pay out of income tax» certainly got a mention — and huge cheer as well.)

It's a world where a huge percentage of Web visitors never see the ads that pay for everything they read and watch.

In other words, because their database is huge, they simply sell members» attention — they add advertisements on their website for you to see, and that's how they get paid.

you should see this game as w.o.w. more people will buy and it will go on for years it's not dependent of a holiday season and they pay a monthly fee to play to say it's nothing makes me wonder if you know DQ cause it's the same as saying monster hunter is nothing you may not know it but it has a huge fanbase

As for the ps4 and 720 having better graphics I call bill shit on that I mean they could if you wouldn't mind paying 1 grand + for your system not to mention Sony suffered a huge loss in money thanks to the ps3 so I doubt sinking even more money I to a ps4 will do them any good seeing as that was the plan for the ps3 as for 360 it's already been stated that the 720 will focus on a beast kinetic which of course we can all lol because kiniect is crap even if they beefed it up

I did feel a little let down by the ending however, as what can be seen in the trailers there's a huge fight between Robocop / Murphy and the new up - to - date ED - 209 robots, that whilst CGI filled was actually quite good leading into the final act which unfortunately gave little to no pay - off in the end, with very little impact.

The huge gamble paid off, and I obsessed over it after I saw it.

«We still have a long way to go, but the improvements we are seeing over time in the scholarship program provides strong evidence that empowering low - income and working - class parents to choose the best education for their children is paying huge benefits in Louisiana.»

Automakers want to see the huge investment pay off.

Better rankings (so you appear on more «you might also like» «customers also bought» lists), better visibility (often the free downloads will help sales of other books as well as get you reviews) and higher sales (the majority of people do see a huge jump in sales once the book goes back to paid).

How they are seeing authors make hundreds of dollars through the aforementioned library «pay per use» model, which is a huge opportunity, as well as through sites most authors might not be paying much attention to, including Playster.

See, right now Amazon, which pays its Kindle and CS royalties religiously, is holding in its big corporate pockets a huge debt owed to Mobi authors who were signed up under contracts that no pay out would be made until sales reached $ 150.00.

But if we stop and analyze technology carefully, we'll see the huge role it plays in our day to day lives: we use our smartphones to call an Uber, we keep track of our calories with an app, we pay for groceries with our smartphones and we can dim the light with a voice command.

I'm still a huge advocate for richer content models that truly leverage the ereader device itself, but I'd love to see Amazon, Apple or anyone else who's paying attention to build more basic functionality into their apps.

All we've seen from them is this pointless video saying why Amazon is great (of course they think that; Amazon is paying them to hang out in a huge office and go out to lunch and have fun without ever having to actually produce anything).

with a global slowdown we are destined to see what richard kline pointed out: the gov» t will have to pay HUGE interest yields on treasuries if it is to borrow.

You're not going to see a huge dividend paying company achieve triple - digit growth.

You're sure to see a huge difference in the figure you'll be paying.

If you pay off your balance on your credit card, the next month could see huge improvements on your score.

A more accountable system would see a huge penalty for not paying your share — the tax should be $ 10,000 per person or more.