Just as we've
seen in political debates, sentiment around health care was clearly divided along party lines.
Not exact matches
Recently we've
seen a surge
in enquiries which, I suspect, is due to the high profile publicity surrounding companies such as Burger King who have already undertaken inversion and the top - level
political debate.
«We've
seen this
in misclassifying hate speech
in political debates in both directions — taking down accounts and content that should be left up and leaving up content that was hateful and should be taken down,» he writes.
Now it takes little reflection to
see that most major problems of ecclesial and
political controversy have always been and will continue to be divergent and not convergent ones; accordingly, there is an especially vexing irony
in the fact that those who want to find a «mainstream» position on the Big Issues are almost always those who are committed on other grounds to a pluralist or relativist stance
in matters of public
debate.
(i) the question of gay rights — funny I agree with gay rights, must be a
political debate at its heart (ii) a wonan's right to choose — funny I agree with this,
see above thought (iii) teaching evolution
in school — again I agree (iv) my ability to buy a glass of wine on Sunday — definitely politics here (v) immunizing teens against HPV — got my kids immunized, not even politics here (vi) population control — this is religions fault??? no this is cultural (vii) assisted suicide at end of life — agree with that, still have my religion (viii) global warmning — agree it needs to get fixed, doesn't have anything to do with religion
In an interview with an Atlanta magazine, «Carter fittingly used a parable to illustrate how he'd like to
see the
political / religious
debate unfold.
He said: «We're going to need to change by virtue a humanised
political debate over exactly what we want to
see in our country, that means changing the law, it is also changing the culture so people view abortion as what it is, destruction of an unborn child.»
It is significant that the terms of the
debate about faith
in the world are deemed to have been set by people like Richards Dawkins, just as it is significant that the
debate is
seen as a «
political and secular», rather than a religious, one.
... some Catholic liberals who
saw John Paul II as overly conservative have suggested that his cause is being fast - tracked
in order to score
political points
in internal Catholic
debates.
Yes, this is a man who lists «walking» and «listening to
political debate» as hobbies — can't
see him thumbing through the back pages of the Sun or tuning
in to radio 5 Talksport for his entertainment.
And I completely agree that while the mean - spirited aspects of the
debate were disheartening, the * education * and
political consciousness - raising were fantastic — and probably more likely to succeed
in effecting
political - social change than the other forms of
debate seen yesterday (and today).
First and foremost, where
political studies are concerned, this neglect had been linked with the development of the discipline itself and its
debate in and toward non-Western states and societies specifically (
see, e.g., Anderson 1987:1; Green 1993:517 — 518).
The confusion and frustration we're
seeing isn't about people's inability to process risk and interpret structures, it's that the way
political debate is conducted
in this country has become so patronising and misleading that it's hard to shake the impression you're being lied to.
Labour may not be willing to engage
in the drug
debate, but you can
see that it no longer considers it a club it can beat
political opponents with.
In Germany, meanwhile, Chancellor Angela Merkel saw a small UAV flown by protesters crash - land in front of her at a political event, and a group of protesters staged a protest during a German parliamentary debate on the procurement of armed drones for the Bundesweh
In Germany, meanwhile, Chancellor Angela Merkel
saw a small UAV flown by protesters crash - land
in front of her at a political event, and a group of protesters staged a protest during a German parliamentary debate on the procurement of armed drones for the Bundesweh
in front of her at a
political event, and a group of protesters staged a protest during a German parliamentary
debate on the procurement of armed drones for the Bundeswehr.
This hierarchy is often reflected
in political priorities, and one current
debate where this may be
seen is the discussion over prioritising house building over the protection of the countryside.
And just last night,
in a House of Commons
debate on the European Budget, we
saw Europe turned into a
political football as
political opportunists sought to score a
political point.
It is particularly an issue for those of us who would like to
see more young women involved
in political activity and
debate in the wider society.»
«Providing more live coverage of the key
political debates and discussions has meant that during 2015, a dramatic year
in politics, we've
seen a surge
in people using BBC Parliament to follow proceedings.
But other
political observers
saw in the announcement a chance for Cuomo to boost his profile
in several national
debates — possibly
in advance of a presidential run
in 2016 — as well as a convenient mechanism to take unlimited contributions for ads that, while not explicitly urging people to vote for Cuomo or anybody else, present a glowing portrayal of his actions.
The
Political Parties» Youth Debate Series will see the youth and female representatives of political parties in Ghana debating policies and issues in the run - up to the November 2016 e
Political Parties» Youth
Debate Series will
see the youth and female representatives of
political parties in Ghana debating policies and issues in the run - up to the November 2016 e
political parties
in Ghana
debating policies and issues
in the run - up to the November 2016 elections.
Politicians need a stronger peer - review system that goes beyond the churlish opprobrium of the campaign trail, and I would love to
see a
political debate in which the candidates were required to make the opposite case.
As the concept of open relationships rises
in pop culture and
political debates, some polyamorous families like the Holders and Mullins
see an opportunity to go public and fight stereotypes that polyamory is just swinging, cheating or kinky sex.
Rather, I think the reluctance to contribute [to a
debate in support of Common Core] is due to hubris, impatience to focus on implementation,
political naivete, and disdain for what they
see as mean - spirited carping....
I would have also liked to have
seen a more substantive discussion of the
political points that are being
debated in this election.
The Plain Dealer's Steven Litt
sees the current national mood and fraught
political landscape
in MOCA's Winter / Spring season: «It's clear that at least some of the artists whose works are on view are tapping into the same feelings emerging
in the presidential
debates.
As much as it is a significant challenge, I
see artists playing a huge role
in shaping dialogue around issues affecting our environment and
political processes — and South Florida is at center stage of many of those
debates.
I
see Bill's original work and some related work
in political philosophy, such as Peter Singer's work, as a
debate about the value of nature and the willingness of humans to intervene and manage nature.
They can be
seen as outsiders and so not connected to the
political debate in the U.S..
While the idea of verification of results is a good (if unexceptional) one, it should be remembered that part of the
political tactic of the anti-science politicians
in Washington on other issues (
see examples
in Chris Mooney's book) has been to introduce as many conflicting studies from industry - funded thinktanks as possible, however faulty those studies are, to bury the
debate under noise.
Framing carbon removal as a «third way» risks even further «neglect [of carbon removal]
in political negotiations and public
debate,» (as you write
in the article) as policymakers might
see carbon removal as a distraction to prolong business - as - usual production of GHG emissions, which it clearly is not.
The truth about Judith Curry, as I
see it, is that she has a strong attraction for
political dialogue, and refuses to
see that the public
debate over climate is fundamentally at odds with good science, as is the IPCC - sponsored «consensus» of climate alarmism, or
in her case, of climate
political - worryism (she seems deeply attached to helping bring about «reasonable» and «responsible» climate policies — whereas my view is that any and all such climate policies, now, are necessarily based upon incompetent, false science, are entirely the wrong thing to try to impose upon the people of the world, and need to be summarily thrown out, before one can even begin to have a dispassionate, competent scientific dialogue — as opposed to the
political debate now being served up — on the state of climate science.).
That's not to say that even the radically human - centric view of the
debate wouldn't choose some form of mitigation, but it does suggest that mitigation at all costs, and
in the
political form of that the agenda currently takes would likely be off the cards, so to speak, and would be
seen for the deeply regressive tendency that it is.
Very few politicians supporting any meaningful legislation on climate change, limited discussion
in the Press and
political debates, projections for increasing fossil fuel use as far out as the eye can
see, etc..»
It's exhilarating to
see the fruits of climate research achieve such prominence
in the media,
political debate, and concerns of industrial and municipal stakeholders.
«I don't want to
see a repeat of McCarthyesque behavior and I'm already personally very dismayed by the horrible state of this topic,
in which the
political debate has almost no resemblance to the scientific
debate.»
Much
political capital was expended
in the
debates over the AIA, and legislators likely will want to adopt a wait - and -
see approach on the reforms before enacting further legislation.
As regular readers of this blog now, there is an on - going
debate about balancing Social Emotional Learning interventions with ensuring that these practices don't act as a replacement for needed economic, social and
political policy changes (
see The Best Resources Showing Social Emotional Learning Isn't Enough and,
in particular, my Washington Post piece, The Manipulation of Social Emotional Learning, to learn more about this discussion).