Sentences with phrase «seen in species»

Despite the real gains seen in some species due to concerted conservation effort, these are outweighed by the overall number of species deteriorating in status.

Common diseases seen in these species include respiratory infections caused by bacteria and fungi, crop stasis, egg binding, pododermatitis, liver disease, trauma caused by other animals and internal parasite infestations.

Researchers claim the crest - shaped bony ridge seen in some species» skulls could be the result of sexual selection — and identifying similar crests in our early ancestors could reveal on how they interacted, especially when it came to social hierarchies and mate selection.

Usually, extinction events can be seen in a species» genetic history; as the animals» numbers dwindle, they lose their genetic diversity.

However, one was painted with the natural colors of the golden shiner, the other with a palette not seen in the species.

So you can see in the species of today some of the adaptive transitional body forms that enabled flight to be not such a huge «leap» or «glide» from one type to another.

Not exact matches

Now, to see evolution in other species, you can do things like dig up fossils, and compare the progression of a species.

Atheists: I know many there are many people that practice religion just by fanaticism, I've seen many people in my opinion stupid (excuse the word) praying to saints hopping to solve their problems by repeating pre-made sentences over and over, but there are others different, I don't think Religion and Science need to be opposites, I believe in God, I'm Catholic and I have many reasons to believe in him, I don't think however that we should pray instead of looking for the cause and applying a solution, Atheists think they are smart because they focus on Science and technology instead of putting their faith in a God, I don't think God will solve our problems, i think he gave us the means to solve them by ourselves that's were God is, also I think that God created everything but not as a Magical thing but stablishing certain rules like Physics and Quimics etc. he's not an idiot and he knew how to make it so everything was on balance, he's the Scientist of Scientist the Mathematic of Mathematics, the Physician of Physicians, from the tiny little fact that a mosquito, an insect species needs to feed from blood from a completely different species, who created the mosquitos that way?

Evolution makes predictions about what we would expect to see in the fossil record, comparative anatomy, genetic sequences, geographical distribution of species, etc., and these predictions have been verified many times over.

The reason we see the bewildering variety of species we do in the world is because nature's been at the evolution game for BILLIONS OF YEARS.

Chad has repeatedly betrayed: his non-comprehension of what a species - level change is (i.e. the focus of PE) and that this most minor of changes does not require a wholesale reordering of a genome; his inability to grasp that gradualism, although the clear minority in the fossil record, is present in various lineages (See Gould's various references to Foraminfera); his non-comprehension of the role of historic genetic contingency (i.e. that silent mutations can coalesce into rather dramatic novel functionality, e.g. Lenskis» E. coli); that the nodes of PE are more than sufficient for the requisite species - level evolutionary changes (See Pod Mrcaru lizards); etc, etc..

And see the figures in Scheuchzer, in whose plates 20 different species are represented, vol.

evolution from one species to another is so slow that it can not be seen in any lifetime.

And if you think evolution isn't valid because you can't see the result in our species, you may not be looking hard enough.

At the same time, we would like to see not merely the preservation of existing wilderness, but changes in human habitat and land use that would allow us to share the land much more generously with other species.

Another reason we see that organisms are discrete in terms of their change is that they form discrete units that we call species.

Specimens of that species may be up to 100,000 years of age, e.g., see the 2012 article «Portuguese scientists discover world's oldest living organism» at theportugalnews.com/news/view/1152-20 or see the February 2012 paper, «Implications of Extreme Life Span in Clonal Organisms: Millenary Clones in Meadows of the Threatened Seagrass Posidonia oceanica» on which the news article was based, which is available online at the PLOS ONE website at plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0030454.

Seeing that a state of total socialization awaits the human species, they ask, can we fail to recognize the eastern concept of Karma in this monstrous form?

Insofar as the Progressives were Darwinians, we see another similarity: Darwinian conservative Larry Arnhart is one of the defenders of the goodness of our social natures in service to the species against this self - obsessed liberationism.

A legitimate philosophical anthropology must know that there is not merely a human species but also peoples, not merely a human soul but also types and characters, not merely a human life but also stages in life; only from the... recognition of the dynamic that exerts power within every particular reality and between them, and from the constantly new proof of the one in the many, can it come to see the wholeness of man.

When I see dinosaur bones or variations of one species in our world, then its personally clear to me of evidence of evolution.

In the context of created life as a whole, and in the continuance of the human species, we can see that death has a positive role to plaIn the context of created life as a whole, and in the continuance of the human species, we can see that death has a positive role to plain the continuance of the human species, we can see that death has a positive role to play.

Any «teleological» explanation, in purely philosophical terms, that sees the origin of species as an inevitable movement from «lower» to «higher» can be made to fit the facts very plausibly.

One must see the forward ascent in the background of the countless trials and errors, the waste, deaths and extinctions of species, etc., it took to achieve it.

In his breathtaking conceptualization of planetary life, he saw the emergence of the human species and the subsequent globalization of the planet not in terms of the conquest of the globe by Christianity but as the logical consequence of an ongoing evolutionary procesIn his breathtaking conceptualization of planetary life, he saw the emergence of the human species and the subsequent globalization of the planet not in terms of the conquest of the globe by Christianity but as the logical consequence of an ongoing evolutionary procesin terms of the conquest of the globe by Christianity but as the logical consequence of an ongoing evolutionary process.

I have identified two species of toads and two species of frogs (not counting spring peepers, which I've never actually * seen *) living in my back yard.

Divergence can be seen not only in the multiplication of species over a long period of time, but also in the multiplication and diversification of languages, cultures and nations within the human species.

Ethics and morality are necessary for a species to form a civilization, and we see rudimentary understanding of these concepts in other species — just not as refined.

Furthermore, as Gould noted, while we don't generally expect to see smooth transitions between species in the fossil record, these transitions are well represented at higher taxonomic levels.

Thankfully, others see value in species protection.

see what you have to understand about living in a real world — a world where god is just a story and not real — its a world based on scientific and physical laws that are proven to exist and their effects are measurable... us as humans, mere animals, hold no real power or control aside thru ingenuity which allows us to change our environment to suit us... stay with me here... at this point in human history we ceased to change to suit our environment and started changing it to suit us — thats destruction of the earth to suit one species — that should go over well...

We debate endlessly about Peace, Democracy, the Rights of Man, the conditions of racial and individual eugenics, the value and morality of scientific research pushed to the uttermost limit, and the true nature of the Kingdom of God; but here again, how can we fail to see that each of these inescapable questions has two aspects, and therefore two answers, according to whether we regard the human species as culminating in the individual or as pursuing a collective course towards higher levels of complexity and consciousness?

In those words, and the words of many others, I think we can see the outline of an ethic that avoids self - indulgence yet does not deny the physical facts of a planet with 6 billion people who may soon nearly double their numbers — a planet that grows hotter, stormier and less stable by the day, a planet where huge swaths of God's creation are being wiped out by the one species told to tend this particular garden.

Marx saw religion as a species of fantasizing, an «opium,» foisted by the ruling classes on the proletariat in order that the latter would not be able to identify its oppressors.

I also do nt see much that they have created, or that they could stop time or know how to cure the common cold or something small as knowing all the fish by species in our seas.

According to evolutionary psychology, the emergence of the human species was accompanied by a change in reproductive strategy, a switch to producing a smaller numbers of offspring whose parents made a correspondingly greater investment in seeing them reach adulthood.

In a letter to Darwin, Kingsley acknowledges that he has discarded the idea that God created immutable species at the beginning of time and that he «has gradually learnt to see that it is just as noble a conception of the Deity to believe that he created a few original forms capable of self - development into other and needful forms.»

He next moves on to a consideration of the method he proposes for his non-religious theology, and it turns out to be a certain species of linguistic analysis, but the theological context within which van Buren puts his method to work is, after all, that created by Bultmann and his demythologizing project, and van Buren very clearly sees the sense in which Bultmann, taken seriously, means the end of the rhetoric of neo-orthodoxy and the so - called biblical theology.

It adapts, and I do believe Christians can see and believe in adaptation as it occurs every day, but is entirely different from billions or millions of years of one species evolving into another, with a supposed start of a non-living or non-traceable thing.

Our faith in Christ sees the Incarnation of God in human form as securing a definitiveness to the human being; while the human physical make - up is open to a degree of change - such as getting gradually taller - a species able to commune with God in virtue of being made up of body and soul will not mutate into a new one.

Nowhere is this seen so clearly as in the appearance of the human species.

See Change: Rapid Emergence of New Sea Star Species Illustrates Evolution's Power Two Australian starfish species diverged only 6,000 years ago, offering a glimpse of evolutionary history in theSpecies Illustrates Evolution's Power Two Australian starfish species diverged only 6,000 years ago, offering a glimpse of evolutionary history in thespecies diverged only 6,000 years ago, offering a glimpse of evolutionary history in the making

We had mammal and bird identification books, and I kept a list of what we saw — in all, 16 species of animals and 23 species of birds.

By contrast, the small suppliers, those few that are left, are seen as poor risks, which in fact they are being an endangered species.

Often seen bucking the ocean with a basic propane grill (safer and more userfriendly than wood or charcoal in cramped spaces) lashed to their boats, these hard - working men and women are quick to serve up stories of salmon barbecue, with hefty sides of philosophy on the choicest species of fish, the best cut, the perfect marinade or sauce, and trademark techniques.

From «The Sibley Guide To Birds» - «This tiny distinctive species - a disheveled - looking, long - tailed ball of fluff - is seen in lively, chattering flocks except when nesting.»

I've seen several species of motmots in the tropics, including Blue - crowned Motmots at Finca Hartmann.

-RSB- «Those wild boars that I have seen brought in by the negroes, or the parts of which I have occasionally received as presents, do not in, colour or in size, resemble those in Europe: they rather appear to be the progeny of swine that have strayed into the woods; and which, from having been once tame, partake of the habits of, and now become, wild, but are not, rigidly speaking, of the same species.

If this was the case, there is not enough genetic diversity to allow for genetic recombination to produce the assortment of pod forms seen in the other species.

[According to William Beckford, author of the gothic novel, Vathek] «Those wild boars that I have seen brought in by the negroes, or the parts of which I have occasionally received as presents, do not in, colour or in size, resemble those in Europe: they rather appear to be the progeny of swine that have strayed into the woods; and which, from having been once tame, partake of the habits of, and now become, wild, but are not, rigidly speaking, of the same species.