Sentences with phrase «seen little discussion»

Not exact matches

There is now more discussion of the Fed tightening rates a little sooner rather than later and perhaps that is adding to some investor angst being seen today.

Likewise, there has been little movement in a number of Asian currencies against the US dollar (for a discussion of the Chinese renminbi see Box C).

If you read the article a little closer you will see that the scriptural reference used comes from the Bible's New Testament, where Paul having a discussion regarding the resurrection, asks why would followers of Christ at his time perform baptisms for dead if there were to be no resurrection.

This might be a little bit off - topic here, but I see it as a progression of the discussion.

My concern is that so little of this discussion is informed by what we're seeing God currently doing on the mission field.

And I freely admit I sometimes use too many extraneous, space - consuming, overly - descriptive, qualifying, words or sentences written quickly and in a stream - of - conscientiousness, run - on sort of fashion with occasional typos mostly due to fatigue of being up way too late (which also explains this post in general) after a long day of political discussion which refreshingly had little religious content though of course there is often much overlap between the two but posting is barely a hobby but more of an occasional passtime so now i wonder if what I write could be considered abuse as I've can't really recall seeing much if any sorrt of «text filibustering» not that this is exactly filibustering more a spontaneous text performance response joke and meant in jest to be absurdly long and useless so of course i hope you appreciate the spirit.

If you don't see this as an absurd strawman argument then there's little to gain by continuing this discussion.

Going back to a little line of discussion from yesterday, I saw LB's reference to Martin Keown saying the new stadium was Wenger's idea.

Yes, the trophy drought is annoying, and it would be nice to see Arsenal win the trophy, but to almost blindly react with #WENGEROUT seems almost thoughtless; there is a time, and a place to have that discussion, but instead of becoming an angry and polarising discussion it should be done when everyone is a little more calmer, and, preferably, at the end of the season.

Can't remember where I saw it, but somewhere a while ago there was a cute discussion among dads about how to take your little daughter into a men's room.

Several noncontroversial budget bills were printed last night, and a few were even passedby the Senate — with very little discussion on the part of majority members and no opportunity for the public to see anything before it was voted on.

Several noncontroversial budget bills were printed last night, and a few were even passed by the Senate — with very little discussion on the part of majority members and no opportunity for the public to see anything before it was voted on.

As McCarthy sees it, both candidates were very clear in their positions and avoided many of the platitudes that bring little value to political discussions.

While the past few years have seen substantial federal and private research funding for infectious disease genomics research, there has been little discussion of the possible ELSIs - for individuals, groups or larger society - of using genomic information in the management of infectious disease.

See the RealClimate discussions of the Little Ice Age and Medieval Warm Period for explanations of why both the Viking colonization of Greenland and the freezing of the River Thames actually tells us relatively little about past climate cLittle Ice Age and Medieval Warm Period for explanations of why both the Viking colonization of Greenland and the freezing of the River Thames actually tells us relatively little about past climate clittle about past climate change.

Many people in online forums and discussion boards claim that they have seen a noticeable increase in energy levels from taking Moringa, though I found relatively little science to back this up and «energy levels» are one of the most difficult factors to measure objectively.

A compelling discussion, it sheds some light on the whole Kingdom of the Sun phase and shares amusing production anecdotes, and various little revealing tidbits (like the briefly - seen llama cactus and Disney's first on - screen pregnancy), all of which is bound to enhance anyone's appreciation for the film.

It is an immensely compelling discussion, which covers revisions resulting from moviemaking challenges and test screenings, amusing production anecdotes, and various little revealing tidbits (like the briefly - seen llama cactus and Disney's first on - screen pregnancy), all of which is bound to enhance anyone's appreciation for the film.

In a debriefing session that followed this particular videoconferencing session, a discussion ensued on the social issues that arise when people see little hope for the future, as well as the ways social, political, and economic forces work together in negative ways that can exacerbate tensions in distressed communities.

While they might be statistically significant, they might mean relatively little in the grand scheme of things (i.e., in terms of practical significance; see also «The Difference Between» Significant» and «Not Significant» is not Itself Statistically Significant» or posts on Andrew Gelman's blog for more discussion on these topics if interested).

It would definitely be nice to see more actual discussion on the topic... although it looks a little like you've already made up your mind, based on your replies here.

Interesting too that the bookstore is seeing opportunities upstream from book - selling, driving its own revenues, something there has been too little discussion of in recent years among bookstores.

And personally, I've seen little willingness on management's part to engage with & advance any kind of serious discussion with potentially interested acquirers (of its business, or assets).

On the other hand, I haven't seen a single mention of a public discussion of 332-2002 among the dozens of Beacon Journal stories I've read on the topic — it seems there was very little public input on either side of the issue.

Speaking of the ending it seems that shipping Hulk off in the quinjet was both a way to make his own story arc a little sadder and to explain his absence in the forthcoming movies which he thus far has not been confirmed for, and while I'd love to buy into forum discussion that he's actually been fired into space in order to make a Planet Hulk film I don't see it happening, although since Planet Hulk is one of my favorite storylines it would be amazing.

Sad to say though, this discussion does remind me a little bit of the comments I saw on an article somewhere else a while back.

Noticing a lack of visceral responses from the anti GW crowd, I tried a simple little experiment to see if Real Climate was a truly open discussion forum or a propaganda site.

I see plots without axis labels, and very little discussion about what this is even about.

I have seen very little better standards at the presidential nomination discussions.

Eli, Yet again we see an»em ergent pattern» in climate science: no compromise, little discussion of uncertainty, and most of all, no possibility that the projections of doom are horribly wrong.

If someone argues that all or even the majority of people who are «alarmed» about climate change — and consider carbon taxes as a potentially viable policy — are Marxist in their intentions, then I see little room for discussion.

I have seen little sensible, or even honest, discussion from the orthodox of what a full - on program of climate change mitigation would mean to the poor of the world, especially with the global economy teetering over the abyss here and now — not theoretically in 2100.

Avoid glaciation I have seen very little discussion addressing the far greater problem of what we do to ensure that we do not descend into the next glaciation.

I also see very little discussion of the result of Doppler and Collision broadening on the up / down split of the atmospheric LWIR emission.

For more on the terrestrial foods topic, see my detailed discussion in this previous post, and this recent (March 30) ScienceNews report on yet another, largely anecdotal «polar bears resort to bird eggs because of declining sea ice» story (see photo below, based on a new paper by Prop and colleagues), which was also covered March 31 at the DailyMail («Polar bears are forced to raid seabird nests as Arctic sea ice melts — eating more than 200 eggs in two hours,» with lots of hand - wringing and sea ice hype but little mention of the fact that there are many more bears now than there were in the early 1970s around Svalbard or that the variable, cyclical, AMO (not global warming) has had the largest impact on sea ice conditions in the Barents Sea).

(I thought I'd better google the study before posting to see how little attention it actually did get - it seems it came out at a time when I was on holiday so I may have missed some of the discussion.

I see little direct analyses and discussion of the reproducibility of measurements of replicate tree wing widths in the dendro literature.

I've seen little evidence of a proper discussion or understanding of the UHI or the natural heat island effects with respect to accurate measurements and post-measurement adjustments.

To this day I have seen little if any discussion of the data files and code contained in FOIA2009.zip Everyone is so into tattler TV that they read the nasty things people say (emails).

As an interested amateur looking at the issues under discussion I see little evidence of other effects caused by man and nature being added to the computer modelsâ?

I've seen precious little acknolwedgement of this critical distinction in this discussion, or in most of the academic discussion.

The «pause» discussion continues (see RC for a summary of recent coverage), which seems a bit silly to me, because it isn't really a «pause» at all, just a continued anthropogenically - forced warming with some other (anthropogenic and natural) forcings and internal variability added on, such that the trend is a little lower than most expected.

He'll look at a file and see what kind of value was added and adjust the fee up or down depending, but «that's a little bit harder to do because you don't have that upfront discussion.»

Take a wander through the Grand Library of others» stories to see what can be done, starting, perhaps with Ashkenas's own «Hypertextopia Manifesto» — but only for a little way, because, for a Friday it gets quite dense in its discussion of literary systems.

I think that there has been surprisingly little discussion (that I have ever seen), about how these «means» change the way we think and work.

I don't know how Barack Obama got dragged into this discussion, but I suppose when one has trouble addressing direct points a little diversion is in order, and what better way than to try and be seen as waving the Canadian flag around by disparaging an American President.

I see a lot of discussion about performance as it relates to energy but little about green building.

We saw a little baby lamb this afternoon, and had the most wonderful discussion about the innocence of that lamb, and Jesus being called the Lamb of God.