Sentences with phrase «seen men act»

It makes me sad / angry when I see men act like incompetent fathers.

Not exact matches

«At their desks on the other side of the Atlantic, Druckenmiller and Soros saw the rate hikes as an act of desperation by a dying man.

It's not hard to see how that attitude might lead men like O'Reilly to think women exist for their sexual pleasure or for Christians to defend them when they act on that belief.

Muslims who slit their daughters» throats for being seen with a man are just as much a product of believing in a god as your charitable acts are.

-5 - As in the above example (# 2), I fail to see how the acts of violence by bears portray men as violent (not that I deny man is violent).

When he came in, saw the set - up and my attire (or lack of), he proceeded to reprimand me for acting like a man.

The root of the problem as with all these young people supporting someone who didn't report a child assault to police is they don't see anything wrong with what these men are.So it's just a step down that it was done to a child, as they see nothing wrong with the acts between men.Be real, it's our culture now, they don't care about it being a child or not, it's sick and disgusting these young people are heartless and warped.

Man, thus, is not simply a reasoning being but «a seeing, feeling, contemplating, acting» being.

It is never possible to see what act of man does in fact fulfil the will of God.

Let us see how St. Augustine unites this metaphysical doctrine with his faith that in Jesus Christ God has acted at a specific point in history to redeem man.

But again, many of the greatest sacrifices I have seen are from men who gave their last years caring for their wives, the greatest act of love.

I don't see how a so called religious man could live with himself after committing such acts of deceit and betrayal.

Phoenix is a busy man right now - after a two - year break from acting, he can also be seen in cinemas currently as a traumatised soldier in Lynne Ramsay's You Were Never Really Here.

One can see this metaphysical scheme behind the words of Mason and Jefferson in the two acts of the Virginia Assembly quoted above: «that all men are equally entitled to the free exercise of religion, according to the dictates of conscience; and that it is the mutual duty of all to practice Christian forbearance, love, and charity towards each other.»

What we should have done is to see that in the «Galilean vision», as Whitehead called it, we have the clue to the proper category for use in the God - man relationship; the category is «love in action», the divine Lover acting and the human intentional lover acting too.

In the little - seen Gamer, a young man shares responsibility for the actions of his video - game alter - ego» an avatar (played by Gerard Butler) who is employed to act out the youth's viral simulacrum in real - world situations where hedonistic consumers take on the identities and vices of video - game characters.

Nevertheless, Socrates» understanding of man can also be seen as presupposing and involving a new level of the basic psychic act of distancing.

«Avenging Angels» — Brigham Youngs murderers — they did his bidding like the Mason Family Mountain Meadows Massacre — the massacre of 30 men 40 women and 70 children in Utah by the «Avenging Angels» see «Blood of the Prophets» by Will Bagley (mormon author) Blood Atonement — the practice of the mormons that atones for the death of its members and / or the act of which the mormons retaliate when they do not believe one is following what they think is right — google the 1984 murder the Lafferty brothers commited in Utah of their sister in - law and her 9 month old daughter by slitting their throats.

Matthew 6:1 Be careful not to do your «acts of righteousness» before men, to be seen by them.

That man can see, analyze the determinists that press on him attest8 to the fact that be can envisage them simply as objects confronting him and, by seeing them in this way, act as a free man.

As for this article and anyone who speaks Christian, Jesus said of those who speak and act in such a way to be seen of men (and impress them) «they have their reward.»

And the scientist who sees his life in relation to God and man may perhaps have the courage and the integrity to act in accordance with his convictions.

ACTS 8, ACTS 10, ACS 19 Rom 6:4 (WITNESSESS) Holiness without no man shall see the Lord.

To love is to discover and complete one's self in someone other than oneself; an act impossible of general realisation on earth so long as each man can see in his neighbor no more than a closed fragment following its own course through the world.

When Paul says, «He did not please himself,» he is thinking not primarily of the human example of Jesus (although, as we shall see, that was implied), but of the act of the divine Son of God in emptying himself of his glory and becoming man.

The tightening network of economic and psychic bonds in which we live and from which we suffer, the growing compulsion to act, to produce, to think collectively which so disquiets us — what do they become, seen in this way, except the first portents of the super-organism which, woven of the threads of individual men, is preparing (theory and fact are at one on this point) not to mechanize and submerge us, but to raise us, by way of increasing complexity, to a higher awareness of our own personality?

So the New Testament offers man a way out where philosophy sees none: «At the very point where man can do nothing, God steps in and acts — indeed, he has acted already — on his behalf»

Campbell saw that this act of confession has power to lead men toward a new communion with God.

So when I saw the faces once again of so many with whom thirty years before and in the decades that followed I had - so often bitterly embattled against the Establishment - faced that challenge, men from whom inevitably I had become separated on my own conversion to Rome; and when I saw their profound happiness at the Pope's great and apostolic act, and their excitement at the prospect before them, I could not fail to remember once more a famous passage from the Apologia pro Vita Sua, which the agnostic George Eliot said she could not read without tears; and certainly, I can not:

It was then that I saw that to expect to put a stop to this disorder by my reason and my will, which were themselves diseased, would be to act like a blind man who should pretend to correct one of his eyes by the aid of the other equally blind one.

Others become more tolerant when they see someone act as this pastor did and think to themselves, God's love must be even more powerful than this man's hate.

(Emerson writes: «When we see a soul whose acts are regal, graceful, and pleasant as roses, we must thank God that such things can be and are, and not turn sourly on the angel and say: Crump is a better man, with his grunting resistance to all his native devils.»

I wept because I had been made to see, for the first time, that all the justice that must be shown the black man, all the help given him, everything that should be done legally to give him his rights, will never do what a simple act of love can do: make him know that he is accepted, cared for, yes, really loved by those who do not just «do good to him» but who feel with passionate concern that he is a human brother.

In another scene, the novel scolds men for resisting this liberated view of sex, as Langdon reminisces about a lecture he'd recently given to undergraduates: «The next time you find yourself with a woman, look in your heart and see if you can approach sex as a mystical, spiritual act.

Beyond that our main concern must be to see that man, whose folly drove him from the Garden of Eden, does not commit the blasphemous act of destroying, whether in fear or in anger or in greed, the great and lovely world in which, even in his fallen state, he has been permitted by the grace of God to live.

This reward can evidently never become the motive of the act, and nevertheless we should misunderstand and fail to appreciate what happens between man and man, if we did not see that for the kindness of man this reward is promised.

Jesus then sees the act as expressing the whole man, that is, he sees his action from the view - point of decision: Either - Or.

But as we are taught by our deepening insight into the dominant role of love in the world and the central place of man's response to that love, and as a consequence of our better understanding of human nature in its psychological depths, we are beginning to see ever wider implications of the truth that God wills and works for men to become men and in freedom to act like men.

It is for this reason that I consider it the first and primal act of ethical and theological consideration what the well - known theologian of the «phenomenon of man», Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, refers to as the responsibility of «seeing», of being able to «understand» the «phenomenon» and the «facts» of history and human development that are taking place within the wider spectrum of the movement of the human spirit to move beyond where it currently stands into a different and perhaps higher level of its manifestation.

Newman's journey into Catholicism (see James Tolhurst's article later in this issue) involved a deepening recognition of man's need for God's Word of authority, not least to arrest the «wild, living intellect of man... that universal solvent which is so successfully acting upon religious establishments.»

Act 7:56 «And said, Behold, I see the heavens opened, and the Son of man standing on the right hand of God.»

The emotion was partly frustration at the sight of young men caught up in futile studies: «Part of my cross, indeed its heaviest portion, is that I have to see friars born with the highest gifts for fine studies spending their lives and wasting their energies in such play - acting... All my files are filled with material against these books which I consider absolutely useless.

I want to see a religious leader act like a rightous man, and you question if I hold myself to the same standards?

A man may gaze at a highly formalised icon and gradually see through it to the world of spiritual truth which it symbolises; the «love of God» can act as an iconic form of words able to be understood actively or passively; the genitive can be understood in either the ablative or the dative sense.

The book is especially strong at pointing out links between the stories, especially the parallels between the pairings of Isaac and Rebekah and Judah and Tamar; both women covered their faces before meeting the men, both meetings occured near a well with a name that puns on the act of seeing, and both have twins who struggle in the womb, with one twin associated with the color red.

Look at King James who had the bible translated into English... he was a terrible man, and committed terrible acts, yet he was the one in Charge of commissioning the translators and over saw the whole process.

Because it is a moral crisis, Christians have the right and the responsibility to speak out and to act — presumably from the principle of stewardship which rejects and resists any redescription of man's powers relative to God's such that the earth is seen as man's to do with as he will.

Rom 1:28 And just as they did not see fit to acknowledge God any longer, God gave them over to a depraved mind, to do those things which are not proper, Rom 1:29 being filled with all unrighteousness, wickedness, greed, evil; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, malice; they are gossips, Rom 1:30 slanderers, haters of God, insolent, arrogant, boastful, inventors of evil, disobedient to parents, Rom 1:31 without understanding, untrustworthy, unloving, unmerciful; Rom 1:32 and although they know the ordinance of God, that those who practice such things are worthy of death, they not only do the same, but also give hearty If there is a man who lies with a male as those who lie with a woman, both of them have committed a detestable act; they shall surely be put to death.

The Columbus Theatre is where you can see larger acts like The Tallest Man on Earth.

I hate when we act mighty & everything and start bashing other team.you must not have seen the match, Man Utd were not woeful last night.