Sentences with phrase «seen much science»

I haven't seen much science saying Antarctica is changing things in the Southern Hemisphere.

Not exact matches

You see, there's an entire subfield of computer science that can roughly be described as «pulling information out of things that look exactly like the Bitcoin transaction graph», and while these researchers haven't done much to Bitcoin yet — that's only because they're still fighting over the grant money.

Re-run the larger science theories through the «scientific method» and see how much of it passes the filter.

Much of the business of science is in imagining stuff we can't see (representational for all of our senses), then going forth to prove our hypothesis.

... time to split the country... the northern part should join up with Canada, a very progressive and successful country with gay marriage, a place where almost everyone would like to call home and... jesusland where ignorance is rampant, where god will solve all your problems, where «science» will be abolished and where eventually all creativity and problem solving will be seen as blasphemous... very much in keeping with taliban thinking don't you think?

The apparent randomness as well as the struggling and unpredictable meanderings that science sees in evolution, and which have caused so much theological controversy, are just what we should expect if the world is in some way left to be itself by the non-interfering goodness of a self - emptying God.

I have seen religious books with science in them, much of which is wrong.

My hunch would be that you would not see much difference in dividing the national academy of sciences scientists according to religious belief because those believers basically subscribe to the non-overlapping magisteria idea.

A general review of the endnotes from Gunter's paper reveals a fair number of sources who will corroborate the claim that Bergson's scientific views are nor only not outdated, but go very» much to the heart of current scientific methods and insights, but particularly, see A. C. Papanicolaou and Pete A. N. Gunter, eds., Bergson in Modern Thought Towards a Unified Science (New York: Harwood Academic Publishers, 1987), and for important background on how Bergson came to be seen as dated when he was not, see also, Milic Capek, Bergson and Modern Physics, (cited above) and The Philosophical Impact of Contemporary Physics (Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand, 1961), and the volume edited by Gunter, Bergson and the Evolution of Physics (cited above).

Lewontin thus saw creationism as falsified not so much by any discoveries of modern science as by universal human experience, a thesis that does little to explain either why so absurd a notion has attracted so many adherents or why we should expect it to lose ground in the near future.

Is it possible and after reading about it i kept on thinking «i will sell to my soul for 20 carats get out shut up i will never ever sell my soul to you oh god please help me and this is continuing for a few days i am afraid that i have sold my sold to the devil have i please help and still i think god's way of allowing others to hate him us much worse even you know and can easily think think about much better punishments like rebirth after being punished for all the sins in life and i am feeling put on the sin of those who committed the unforgiviable sin (the early 0th century priests) imagine them burning in hell fire till now for 2000 years hopelessly screaming to god for help i can't belive the mercy of god are they forgiven even though commiting this sin keans going to hell for entinity thank you and congralutions i think the 7 year tribulation periodvis over in 18th century the great commect shooting and in 19th century the sun became dark for a day and moon was not visible on the earth but now satun has the domination over me those who don't belive in jesus crist i used to belive in him but now after knowing a lot in science it is getting harharder to belive in him even though i know that he exsists and i only belived in him not that he died for me in the cross and also not for eternal life and i still sin as much as i used to before but only a little reduced and i didn't accept satan as my master but what can i do because those who knowingly sin a lot and don't belive in jesus christ has to accept satan as their master because he only teaches us that even though he is evil he gives us complete freedom but thr followers of jesus and god only have freedom because they can sin only with in a limit and no more but recive their reward after their life in heaven but the followers of satun have to go to hell butbi don't want to go to hell and be ruled by the cruel tryant but still why didn't god destroy satun long way before and i think it was also Adam and eve's fault also they could have blamed satan and could have also get their punishment reduced but they didn't and today we are seeing the result

Yet, if they could momentarily throw aside their infantile pseudo intellectual brainwashing, they would see that even though science can never prove or disprove something defined to be outside science, if we look at every other species known to man, we see that they interact with a universe that WE know to be much more complex than what they can perceive or grasp, but they can never even suspect exists but which is perfectly real to us.

Follow the National Center for Science Education to see how much religious legislation attempts to get through state educational boards every year.

Our «science» is simply a way for us to explain the world around us... nobody has ever seen a graviton but we know it warps space / time and that it interacts across vast distances but in a much smaller way than the strong nuclear force for example (which again is a made up force on our part to just understand our universe)

Science believes in what it can see and prove; Nature and GOD are something beyond those... much beyond those for anyone to disprove their existence.

I am glad to see the collaboration between science and faith, but it seems there is not very much new under the sun, just new people to do «research and learn it» — Monasteries both eastern and western have been at the core of learning, of science, of faith, of culture, and the development of libraries, and other «storage places of knowledge and wisdom.

See we can make things real, how Science may argue that the brain can have so much impact that it may influence the outcome of things, answer back so I can explain more.

Nevertheless, recent developments in the scientific culture, especially as we see them reported in books like James Gleick's Chaos: Making a New Science, suggest that Snow's greatest mistake was his failure to take into account the extent to which the literature of science is literature itself, which has all along anticipated much of what science ultimately spells out in its own terms — terms that have often enough seemed invidious to liteScience, suggest that Snow's greatest mistake was his failure to take into account the extent to which the literature of science is literature itself, which has all along anticipated much of what science ultimately spells out in its own terms — terms that have often enough seemed invidious to litescience is literature itself, which has all along anticipated much of what science ultimately spells out in its own terms — terms that have often enough seemed invidious to litescience ultimately spells out in its own terms — terms that have often enough seemed invidious to literature.

The end result is that we can agree with much of what science says about the formation of the Grand Canyon while at the same time, seeing that such views are supported and defended by Scripture.

But there is much more to be done, and the FAITH Movement in this Spring of 2017 sees an increasing need for the specifc message of its New Synthesis of science and the Catholic Faith, with its dynamic of understanding that has fostered so many vocations to the priesthood and so much dedicated lay activity over the past decades.

This must be one of the reasons why Whitehead devotes so much space to questions concerning the methods and principles of applying mathematical ideas to the phenomena of nature, and why he sees himself obliged to write that «all science as it grows to perfection becomes mathematical in its ideas» (IM 6).

One wonders whether, in the future, when we shall know so much more about what literature says and how it hangs together than we now do, we shall come to see literary myth as a similarly constructive principle in the social or qualitative sciences, giving shape and coherence to psychology, anthropology, theology, history and political theory without losing in any one of them its own autonomy of hypothesis.»

We see the same flour / water combination behaving differently from one time of year to another (or even from day to day); and it's as much experience as science that teaches us what's going on, and how to adapt.

I feel we needed so much of Houllier's approach at the time, mainly the behind - the - scenes sports science changes, but I wouldn't like to see us revert back to such a style of football again.

Try coloring your Easter eggs naturally this year and see how much fun it is to combine science with Easter egg decorating!

I think science can seen scary to start with, I didn't do much at all till my eldest son was almost 4, just because the thought never occurred to me, but now it's quite a big part of all our lives, and I think it has made everyone a bit more curious about the world as result.

I was somewhat reassured to see, when visiting some secondary comprehensive schools in the UK, that their science labs were smaller and much less well - equipped than the ones I could remember.

I really want to share this experience with you and provide you with as much information as I can so you can see how TRULY manageable this science activity is to do at home with your kids!

As a result, dams have received much criticism from academics in the social sciences, and national and international NGOs, culminating in anti-dam social movements like those seen against the Narmada project in India.

As someone working somewhere in the midst of that nexus of «science, values, ethics and politics» you describe (economics, international relations, technology... the climate policy list goes on), I do recognise what you're talking about, but I really don't see that we should very much care.

During my career, working at three sites at Glaxo and at Pfizer globally, I have seen quite a few different ways of doing things, and that's always been quite helpful, but the science has been the bit which hasn't changed as much.

This is a long way from the quest for endless gasoline and from seeing life as programmable parts, and shows how much the science of synthetic biology is willing to evolve.

Next were the innovation years, which saw the birth of publishers such as the Public Library of Science and of software infrastructure that makes it much easier to launch a digital journal.

In a world wide survey aimed at finding out how much people know about science and the environment (see This Week), only 18 per cent of Russians and 23 per cent of Czechs said they agreed with the statement «Astrology has some scientific truth.»

One of the most common mistakes I've seen in résumés from science Ph.D. s is trying to make the résumé do too much.

I might add, you know, there are so many things that Martin Gardner did that are so important to me, but I should mention his first, the first book of his that I ever saw, which was Fads and Fallacies in the Name of Science, which I remember very clearly running into at age 14 in a friend's book [shelf] and that book just, what's the word, the scales fell from my eyes I think is the expression; meaning that I, up until age 14, even though I had grown up in a family, my father was a physicist and I was very exposed to science, I never really thought too much about, I mean, things that, sort of, you might say superstitions or just, sort of, I don't know, mysterious [forces] in the world, you know ESP and paranormal things and predicting the future and such Science, which I remember very clearly running into at age 14 in a friend's book [shelf] and that book just, what's the word, the scales fell from my eyes I think is the expression; meaning that I, up until age 14, even though I had grown up in a family, my father was a physicist and I was very exposed to science, I never really thought too much about, I mean, things that, sort of, you might say superstitions or just, sort of, I don't know, mysterious [forces] in the world, you know ESP and paranormal things and predicting the future and such science, I never really thought too much about, I mean, things that, sort of, you might say superstitions or just, sort of, I don't know, mysterious [forces] in the world, you know ESP and paranormal things and predicting the future and such things.

In future research, said senior author Eric Darling, the Manning Assistant Professor of Molecular Pharmacology, Physiology and Biotechnology and a member of the Center for Biomedical Engineering assistant professor of medical science, the team would like to target a gene expressed much earlier in the differentiation process to see if they can avoid a priming period.

The next day will be of assessing the present environment to see how much science can be done in such a compromised position.

The scientific community would much prefer to see him learning about science firsthand than being closeted with minders and advisers.

IN AN age when science is dominated by the strange and unfamiliar realities of the very large, the very small and the very chaotic, I find it refreshing to be reminded that there is still much to be explained and appreciated about the familiar physical and biological phenomena that we can touch, feel and see.

Weinberg spoke with Quanta Magazine about the past and future of physics, the role of philosophy within science, and the startling possibility that the universe we see around us is a tiny sliver of a much larger multiverse.

Although additional studies would need to be conducted to see how much commercial presenters influence child viewers, Powers, associate professor of media arts, sciences and studies at Ithaca College, argues that commercials could have a significant impact on how children develop self - perceptions.

Well the science would still move right along because the scientists are all going to see it in the actual journals, so we are not interfering with the progress of science, and by the time we would actually write about this stuff there would be a much clearer opinion about whether or not this was a real finding and whether or not it held up in any sort of way.

In the words of Nobel prize - winning economist Joseph Stiglitz: «If science is defined by its ability to forecast the future, the failure of much of the economics profession to see the crisis coming should be a cause of great concern.»

Like Maisano and Pitcher, Usher sees the Jupiter scene in Cymbeline as a response to Galileo's discovery — but he takes «Shakespearian science» much further, arguing that examples of the playwright's scientific knowledge can be found in works spanning his entire career.

(And beyond economics, this principle may have equally radical consequences for much of the rest of science [see sidebar].)

What color vision means to animals is tricky science, because while we can examine the comparative anatomy of eyes, it's much more complicated to determine how an individual species» central nervous system and brain interpret what the eye sees.

Until recently, there was little love lost between researchers and the E.U. Scientists have long bemoaned Europe's Framework Programmes for their focus on applied research, the forced collaboration between many labs and companies across the continent, the crippling bureaucracy, and what many see as too much meddling by politicians and bureaucrats in Brussels (Science, 8 December 2006).

The 2 May x-ray flare, occurring 12 minutes after the burst, carried almost as much energy as the original gamma - ray explosion — «something never before seen and quite unexpected,» according to a paper by David Burrows of Pennsylvania State University in University Park and colleagues published online today by Science.

The uncertainty in the science makes it difficult for policy - makers to see how much investment is justified, and what kind, says van Scheltinga.