I have
seen multiple arguments of which version of the character is the best, based on design, personality or boss fight, and while I can understand that some people tend to lean towards the more menacing, evil, badass representation, I personally adore how for once Ganon was given a sympathetic side in Wind Waker.
Not exact matches
I
see good
arguments for continued easy money and economic growth to push
multiples to all - time highs, and economic strength and tax cuts to push earnings higher.
If Loveless had kept up with our writing (not that I blame him for not) or read Disrupting Class with a bit more of a nuanced eye, he would have
seen that we didn't pin our
argument on
multiple intelligences or learning styles per se — we were quite up front that we are not experts in the learning sciences by any means.
One of the bigger
arguments I hear for having
multiple sites is that people will get confused or readers don't want to
see your writing services and vice versa.
I could make an
argument that AAPL will
see multiple expansion in 2012 if the market goes up (on simple allocation math), and will
see multiple compression in 2012 if the market goes down (again, as allocation dollars move away from equities, dollars will leave AAPL too, helping to support the super bearish
argument on the stock).
The fact that
multiple derivative actions were permitted in a number of jurisdictions with similar company law was
seen to weaken these
arguments.