Sentences with phrase «seen nothing since»

I may be wrong about the outcome, but have seen nothing since then to make that outcome less likely.

Thanks, the basic Karelia numbers look good on Bloomberg, but as you say, I really see nothing since the 2011 annual report in English.

Not exact matches

My oldest daughter is a junior in high school, and it is staggering how much the cost of higher education has escalated since I finished school a decade ago — to say nothing of the job market my daughter expects to see when she graduates.

They're all different but that one was like nothing seen before or since.

The fear of the great nothing is too much for my mind to bear, and I can sleep at night by convincing myself that the absolute nothing we all face one day will instead be full of happy choirs of angels, reward for any suffering I've endured, punishment of the wicked and evil (it pains me to think those who cause so much evil will not suffer for eternity, so hell is a great comfort too), and that I'll get to see all those I currently miss since the death of friends and family are so painful.

I see, and since prayer has nothing to do with gods or jesus, there is no connection with any such discussion.

So they see nothing wrong with continuing to commit so many Satanic acts, since they are already condemned to be eaten by the worm for ETERNITY.

The progress one sees in Poland, Slovakia, and the Czech Republic since 1989 is nothing short of stunning.

I had never seen anything like this seminar, not even in my days at the University of Chicago, and I've seen nothing like it since.

Most of the theology and dogma that developed around him since then resulted, as I see it, from misunderstanding or avoiding his central teaching, which had nothing whatsoever to do with sun worship.

Since 2008, we've seen nothing but extreme partisanship — a flat refusal by either party to work together for the common good.

So since you believe Aquinas was nothing (in comparison to you of course) then Aristotle must be seen as a fool as well - he predicated a «Prime Mover» that causes everything and he believed there were only FOUR elements.

If we have not seen the upward thrust of mountain ranges it is because their rise was accomplished either in widely spaced jerks or with so slow a rhythm that since the coming of Man nothing of the kind has happened, or at least nothing that has been perceptible to us.

The barbarism seen in the world ever since the world has come into being has nothing to do with only religion but with the human race it self

He saw it more as the undefined energies of the universe, than any ent!ty, so I have no idea where you are getting you assertions, but since there is nothing of substance to refute, well just leave it at this.

We now have a good opportunity to know, since we see suggestions daily in our propaganda sheets and even more in the expensive advertisements that so many large commercial firms are using for the building of morale, now that they have nothing to sell to the average reader.

Atheists know nothing, do nothing, lie about everything and we saw since the removal of Jesus» teachings from the public, how many more people expressed the bad behaviors of the atheists.

lol see that is exactly what I have been pointing out since I got here.Atheists literally have nothing.

We see right through it; yet we can see nothing without it, since it provides the grid of meanings by which we filter the manifold of experience.

I see nothing of value in what they are producing, since all they are showing is scorn and disgust for their fellow humans.

The only real truth is that no one knows and the evidence point to there being nothing after we die (since all we see is the body, without any movement or life, slowly decay till it is just base elements such and dirt)!

Thus, as I see it, the options which remain are in fact two: either an existentialist approach or a «process thought» approach, since the «secular» theology in itself does nothing more than deny a particular kind of metaphysic and leaves us open to the possibility of interpreting the secular world, and everything else in human experience, in some appropriate manner.

Their description of the change in administration sounds like nothing we've seen in America since ending the spoils system with the Pendleton Act in the 1880s.

Since it's nothing to her, don't see why she wouldn't hand it to me, right?

It means a life which, in New Testament idiom, is «in the heavenly places» even while it is lived here; for belief, worship, and action are seen as worthwhile, since they can never ultimately be frustrated or useless — God receives them, enjoys them, employs them, to «his greater glory», which is nothing other than His continuing loving action in the advance of the creative process towards the good.

But I know almost nothing about Native religion or theology, having been completely cut off from it by my own family since it was seen as something evil and dangerous.

He is saying that it as though God can not see the evil, because nothing is being done about it, just as he says in the next verse that it is as though men are no better than fish and creeping things, since it seems God is doing nothing to help them.

I don't think Jesus would support this administration... And since you want to know about Jesus... The Bible says if you don't work you don't eat... So I'm SICK of working my butt off and seeing all these people sit around cooking out and not working and wearing real nice clothes, nothing but the best... That is nuts... Nancy Pelosi get out on the streets go from neighborhood to neighborhood... Try Memphis, or New Orleans... You don't have a clue of what goes on... Your Blind...

In the absence of space travel the practical ancients could not see what purpose these planets served, and since it was an axiom of their thought that God or nature does nothing without purpose, the way was open for a widespread acceptance of the principles of astrology.

I haven't tried that part myself, since I like my muffins even when they're not fresh out of the oven, but I can see how it would be useful for those who are rushed in the morning, and who like nothing more than to bite into a still - warm muffin to get off on the right food.

You've been sleeping the past 8 hours since I've seen you, there is nothing new to report.)

The only thing I've seen him do good was when he scored on his debut, since then, nothing.

Besides several teams who have questions surrounding one or possibly two players, there is no squad that has so many issues heading into the final week of the transfer window... even Monaco, who have lost numerous players from their starting 11 have less controversy swirling in and around their club and they have champion's league play to contend with this season... just think of how ridiculous this situation is especially considering that we have had the same manager for over 20 years... no team should be better organized than ours... if nothing else, that should be the one advantage this team holds over all others, yet the exact opposite has occurred... this fact is even more disturbing considering the main argument against removing Wenger from his managerial position was that there was no suitable replacement and that people feared some sort of perceived drop - off if a new manager was brought into the mix... based on what we've witnessed since the time of his contract renewal a monkey with a magic eight ball could have done an adequate job... I hate to make jokes, in light of our current dilemma, but this team is so screwed up if I don't laugh about it, the only plausible response is to either cry or do something incredibly destructive... just look around this squad and try to see what our delusional manager sees that allow him to make such positive statements about our current team

Ramsey did nothing, The Coq had the worst game I have ever seen, Cazorla looked tired as hell, Chambers I don't know why we even play him, Sanchez has been so poor since he got back from injury and Welbeck is just a headless chicken, he ain't got a footballing brain at all..

@Almostawinner, like I've said here before, some fans just don't wan na accept the fact that for this club to move forward, we as fans have got to take matters into our hands because the board can do and will do nothing, since they and Wenger see the club as a cow worth milking.

Nothing I've seen of him since then has convinced me he's gotten better.

Are some of you on here missing a few brain cells as fans There is nothing Arsenal or Wenger can do with the Sanchez situation He wants to leave and has been offered 400k a week in wages who in their right mind is going to turn that down as a player As for blaming wenger who has been our most successful manager helped us build a stadium gave us 20 years of cl football and some of the best teams the ol has seen Including the invincible and you all have the Gaul to trash the man as if he has done nothing for the club I suggest you should look at the plastic fans in the Arsenal blogs that have created a toxic atmosphere at the club They attack their own players in a daily basis why would any top player come to s club where the manager the owners and players are shamelessly attached constantly Yet Wenger wins trophies regularly even them that is derided Look at Spurs Liverpool they win fuk all every year yet their fans back then Look at yourselves and all the negativity that you have created striking the club before you blame Wenger for everything I have been a season ticket holder since the 70s and never have I seen our fanbase been so full of entitled morons who have stopped backing the club and constantly deride the club snd attack it We have the worst fanbase in football you have made this great club a lagging stock in world football All you now us fans constantly moaning If you don't like Arsenal fc then buy out kronke and run the club or fuk off and support someone else You won't be missed Coyg

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

No.the solution is not to get some1 to rotate with Giroud, the answer is to get some1 better than Giroud, period.It worries me that Giroud really thinks that Henry is wrong, this shows how much Wenger an the people at Arsenal are caught up in their own bubble unable to see an overview from outside.We've been saying that Girouds not good enough since he came 3 years ago, an im afraid nothing has changed, he still not world class, i can't think of a top team in Europe he would get into.

Since, the fourth place has nothing important to Arsenal fans and especially myself, the only thing I want to see is the change in management and that will only happen if we keep on loosing games the important fixtures.

Miller was a great hire at the time and he has recruited like nothing this program has seen since Lute and then some.

Ever since this summer's pre-season, we have seen some pretty strange combinations played, but no one was prepared for the insane team selection announced one hour before the Liverpool debacle While nothing can explain, let alone justify, leaving our only two summer signings on the bench for such an important match, and giving starts to our two most fervent want away stars, the maddest decision of all was playing key defenders out of position against a fast, attacking team like Pool.

In a day where cliches and coach - speak rule the day, Lynch first went «beast mode on FCC regulations» by dropping an s - bomb, then showed genuine emotion, talked about his feelings toward the media («I ain't never seen no talking win me nothing; been like that since I was little; was raised like that»), bragged about his team («they going to have to stop all of us.

Why is a so called «Professor» paid so much obscene money only to see nothing of our weaknesses and woes ever since?

I saw the # 30m deadline day move for Sissoko as nothing more than a panic buy back in September, and nothing has changed since then.

This is a fair comment when we saw Harry Winks perform to a much higher level last season in limited appearances than club record signing Moussa Sissoko, who has proved to be nothing short of a walking disaster since his move last summer for # 30m.

I'm sorry this question has nothing to do with your post, but I've been following your blog for a while and since I'm pregnant with my second child I wanted to see what you thought about the subject of scheduled nursing after birth.

Good evening and weldone I saw my menstrual on 12th of October just a drop truout that day nothing came again until d third day which is 14th of October I did tracking day 14 and 16 I was told that no follicle seen now since three days ago I have been having sorebreast paining me seriously what could be the cause Pls help a concerned sis

She slid it in front and I figured nothing had changed since I could still see everything, albeit a tinge darker, then she turned the laptop to be on the side of me and I realized I could not see the screen.

When a woman is told by lets say their dad or uncle» if you let them cry it out they will be better as they grow up» This is just my opinion, Women have the «nurturing instinct» meaning when they are told they should put their baby down and them CIO and they do so their instinct is telling them to go pick the baby up but another influence tells them other wise, now MEN to me have the instinct to teach their youngins to «cry me river its not so bad youll live» id prefer not letting my child CIO, I just wanted to see how long out of curiosity that she would CIO (my dad suggested i try) and she went on for an hour before i said forget this i cant concentrate i have to pick her up cuz it ai nt doin nothing... so i havnt done it since.