Sentences with phrase «seen on film so»

Jason Statham Workout The Jason Statham Workout turns him into the tough guy that is seen on film so often.

Not exact matches

I haven't seen this film, and so can not comment on it - but to all who lump atheists with communists, nazis, hedonists, and every other debased human quality, you are wrong.

Filming will take place in London and begins this fall, so we can probably expect to see it on TV in early 2017.

The song, which has been covered endlessly, has become the most played Christian single played on the radio and is about the experience when you see God face - to - face, so it will be interesting to see how that's conveyed in a feature film.

So in the film, you'll see the students testify on legislation in our capital.

I have seen film on Flowers so I know what he can do but I can't find much on Bawden.

That reconciled the gulf between what Ford did at his pro day and what I saw on film, so I am confident enough in my assessment that a differing opinion won't shake it.

So, it'll be interesting to see how that all unfolds on film.

The DVD explored the experiences of young parents, mostly young women, so it was refreshing to see a young father's perspective on film.

So if we can increase the percentage of women working behind the scenes on films, not only will women's voices be heard more, but we'll see a result on - screen in an increase in the percentage of female characters.

I've decided to step out of my shell a bit and start filming some mini Vlogs so that you can see what I do on a weekly basis.

I was so happy when so many of you requested in the reader survey and on Instagram this weekend to see the full length feature film of our wedding weekend by Inkspot Crow.

From time to time we see post roundups on fashion books to read, fashion films to watch and so on.

As it turned out, filming videos is really fun, so you'll see more of it on my blog and YT channel soon:) Hope you're having an amazing week!

I can also see how a reviewer stated that they are using this as a makeup artist because it looks so pretty and probably looks even more amazing in HD photographs or on film.

Being on set, it was amazing seeing so many moving parts coming together to create a film.

I've seen plenty of so - bad - they're - good horror movies, but few are on the level of New Moon Rising, a film that I am genuinely unable to describe.

What I do know is that I had scheduled my flights to Madrid this weekend around going to Somerset House, and whilst Would - have - been 14 refused to sell me the Somerset House tickets, there were still some available for the film, so on a whim I bought two and decided to ask around to see if any of my friends could find in a «stand - in» at short notice.

With TMNT 2, or Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Out of the Shadows (that's a mouthful so I'll stick to TMNT 2), we'll be seeing the yet another trailer for a major 2016 film release based on some sort of childhood icon, and I have to admit, it's the one I was the least excited for.

I've only seen the Les Miserables film that is kinda old, so I'm not a real Les Mis freak, I just had a field show on it.

It is not so much based on the 1984 film which starred Jeff Bridges as a sequel to it... Even if you saw the movie, you may find the TV show confusing... If you didn't, you may be utterly bewildered.

«Once You See It, You Can't Unsee It» is the slogan on the film's Tumblr page — one that features a never - ending stream of animated GIFs from the movie (as if the advertisers knew the film wasn't going to meme itself, so they created an illusion of online popularity).

So there isn't too much stretching of the imagination really, one story just sees more villainous tomfoolery with Yzma and the other just follows on from a single idea at the finale of the last film.

Suffice it to say, I now really want to see The Room, but perhaps only as a double back - to - back feature with this film - because they work so harmoniously together and it allows me to appreciate what actually happened here, what was really going on with this film (and why it is what it is).

I don't think I've seen a film that functioned so well on this level since Blade Runner.

Not knowing that this film would spend so much time focussing on the relationship of Edward and his girlfriend Lindsay (Shailene Woodley), I was pleasantly surprised to see such great chemistry from these two unlikely performances.

It is so unknown, that one of his biggest fans, didn't even realize that this film was based on a story by Dick, until I saw it in the credits.

Some things that probably factor into the industry's disagreement: Peter Jackson adapted books fifty years old and respected as great literature, the Potter books were being written alongside the first movies; Lord of the Rings centered on adult characters and played to a wider audience with PG - 13 ratings, the first Potter movies were PG, skewed younger, and starred kids (though anyone can see the films matured and so did the fans, many already wrote the series off); finally, where Jackson provided one distinct vision and a cast of respected performers, Potter had a rotating director roster (all of them secondary to Rowling) and limited opportunities for its accomplished actors, giving the brunt of the work to the three kids and spectacle.

The best performances lie with the supporting players (aside from Umbers, who's so dull that you'd think he was one of the many statues you see throughout the film), and the finest one comes from Tom Wilkinson, playing a twice - divorced man who sets his sights on Stella, knowing full well she'd be in it just for the money.

Cliche piles on top of cliche to make a nearly two - hour film feel twice as long, simply because we see so many things coming that we feel as though we're watching each section twice.

Step Up, Strictly Ballroom, Singing in the Rain — heck I've seen so many Bring it On films I could practically run my own cheer squad.

So if we buy their own logic, Paramount is telling us that it chose to release a worse version of the movie because it was easier for 15 - year - olds to go see it on group dates, and that Ferrell, a producer on the film and one of the more powerful talents in Hollywood, acceded to this.

The same accident plays out twice more elsewhere in America, on the plains of Wyoming and in the Florida Everglades: anyone who has played the game or seen the trailer will already know the results, but the film has so much fun unveiling them it would be a pity to give them away in print.

They forget that the original film version of «The Haunting» (based on Shirley Jackson's truly terrifying «The Haunting of Hill House») worked so well because of what the audience didn't see.

I'm no expert on this genre, in fact I've only just strarted watching Vampire films in the last couple of months, however I feel this is one of the dullest I've seen so far.

However, on seeing the film, I couldn't believe this was the same film I had heard so much about.

So says professional killer Jackie Cogan at one point in Killing Them Softly, the third film by New Zealander Andrew Dominik - and considering the filmmaker's efforts to establish a connection between the events in the movie and the economic crisis started in the late 2000s thanks to the greed and lack of scruples of Wall Street, it is easy to see Cogan as an ordinary employee of any company complaining about the lack of vision of his bosses and, on the other hand, the big bankers as Armani - dressing versions of the violent mobsters who inhabit the crime section of the newspapers.

Two of the main reasons to see this film are both newly implemented, for the Black Panther and Spider - Man bring so much energy to this title, and their time spent on screen is never wasted — as we now anticipate their own standalone productions.

Eisenbergwas recently cast as Lex Luthor in Batman vs. Superman, which begins filming this summer, so there's a good chance that he will move straight on to the Now You See Me sequel immediately afterwards.

Furthermore, why do we need to see Kennedy's death again in film, presented the same exact way stylistically as so many other pictures have done before this, in a movie that isn't even centered on the beloved Democrat?

Even though a lot of the scares weren't as effective for me in this film because of the more comedic tone, I could definitely see the impact and effect they had on the audience, so I'm sure those segments work.

If you haven't seen this film, I was just delighted to find out it's now on Netflix, so go watch now!

Naomie Harris said she doesn't smoke or drink, so for the film's latter scene when Chi» ron comes to visit her and she's trying to light the cigarette, she didn't know that director Barry Jenkins had pulled Trevante Rhodes aside and told him to take the cigarette out of her hand, so what we see on screen in that moment was improvised on the spot to come to her rescue.

I was so inspired by the film seeing it a second time that I wrote a poem about it on Twitter (reposted below).

The film's currently slated for U.K. release on October 4th, so don't be surprised to see it added to the line ups at TIFF or Fantastic Fest in the near future, before Magnolia release the film further down the line.

Fox announces their distrust of critics with this title by splaying «Property of 20th Century Fox Publicity Department» in huge letters across the screen for the duration of the film on both sides of the disc (the first time a major studio has done so since DreamWorks sent out advanced copies of the Gladiator Signature Selection in 2000 — which is why you never saw a review of it at FILM FREAK CENTRAL), in turn prohibiting an ethical assessment of the imfilm on both sides of the disc (the first time a major studio has done so since DreamWorks sent out advanced copies of the Gladiator Signature Selection in 2000 — which is why you never saw a review of it at FILM FREAK CENTRAL), in turn prohibiting an ethical assessment of the imFILM FREAK CENTRAL), in turn prohibiting an ethical assessment of the image.

Surely the job was one of the most punishing of his career so far, but up on screen we have an unadorned, practically barren costume portfolio encompassing mainly function and hierarchy, apart from perhaps General Hux's (Domhnall Gleeson) rather jaunty cap and Leia's (Carrie Fisher) conspicuous saw - tooth neckline glimpsed near the end of the film.

mmm... a protagonist who complete dominates a long film to the detriment of context and the other players in the story (though the abolitionist, limping senator with the black lover does gets close to stealing the show, and is rather more interesting than the hammily - acted Lincoln); Day - Lewis acts like he's focused on getting an Oscar rather than bringing a human being to life - Lincoln as portrayed is a strangely zombie character, an intelligent, articulate zombie, but still a zombie; I greatly appreciate Spielberg's attempt to deal with political process and I appreciate the lack of «action» but somehow the context is missing and after seeing the film I know some more facts but very little about what makes these politicians tick; and the lighting is way too stylised, beautiful but unremittingly unreal, so the film falls between the stools of docufiction and costume drama, with costume drama winning out; and the second subject of the film - slavery - is almost complete absent (unlike Django Unchained) except as a verbal abstraction

Steve Carell and Paul Rudd have worked together previously on The 40 Year Old Virgin, and Anchorman, but in their previous films they didn't have as much on - screen time together, so it was interesting to see how their dynamic changed.

The film's said to be a more comedic kind of picture than what we're used to from Mr. Washington (we've been dying to see him display his funny bones, especially with the gold - toothed get - up he seems to have going on here), and Wahlberg always fares well with that kind of dynamic, so this is potentially a pretty potent pairing.