Thank you for the question, fore through this dialog I have
seen the errors of my ways thinking I actually knew the answer.
Not exact matches
Love is humility and respect: I was going to say love means tolerance, but tolerance has the ring
of superiority to it... like, «I, because I am right and you are wrong, will tolerate you in your
error until you finally
see the light like I did and come around to my
way of thinking!»
One
of my brothers
thought he hated chipotles, but when I introduced him to them sans ancho, he
saw the
error of his
ways.
Keto is not easy, and it takes a considerable amount
of planning and trial and
error to
see what works for you, but, I
think I've found a
way to make it work.
I
think he is nearly starting to
see the
error of his
ways as far as player recruitment, lack
of tactics and stubborness.
Thinking about all those years when I was eating several apples a day «to be healthy», I can
see the
error of my
ways.
I don't
think it's enough to say that its been dealt with by Marcott's admissions when the paper is promoted in that
way, with graphics like that one, but by the same token, I don't
see the
errors in some
of these claims rise enough to the level to doubt things like the instrumental temperature record.
A more accurate model is: politics is a system that 1) selects against skills needed for rigorous
thinking and for qualities such as groupthink and confirmation bias, 2) incentivises a badly selected set
of people to consider their career not the public interest, 3) drops them into dysfunctional institutions with no relevant training and poor tools, 4) centralises vast amounts
of power in the hands
of these people and institutions in
ways we know are bound to cause huge
errors, and 5) provides very weak (and often damaging) feedback so facing reality is rare, learning is practically impossible, and system reform is
seen as a hostile act by political parties and civil services worldwide.