Sentences with phrase «seen the proof with»

I have seen the proof with my own two eyes.

Now we see the proof with significantly improved test scores.»

If we don't let other people see the proof with their own eyes then why on earth should they believe us?

Not exact matches

One of those shortcuts is social proofing: Seeing a person who has 20,000 followers and is following only 200 indicates they must have something of value to share with their audience.

This coupled with a proof of principal prototype was enough for investors to connect the dots and see what was possible.

Matt asks:»... What I'd like to see from you and the other prophets of social media publish are the top 10 things I can do immediately that will help me spread the gospel of home ownership and drive brand preference to CENTURY 21...» Interestingly, my response quickly reached the first page of the Google results for the phrase «Century 21 Real Estate» a company with 8,000 offices worldwide, proof that new marketing works.

1) See if some billionaire wants to sleep with your wife for a million dollars 2) Give the casino a security interest in your house, and hope you don't have to show proof of income to get the loan 3) Try to get the casino to give you back the money you lost.

We have yet to see solid, unbiased proof that anyone has actually profited with this system.

With its depression - proof business, I see three big risks for American Water Works: tough regulators, operational headaches, and higher interest rates.

There is ample evidence for the existence of God, what you decide to do with this evidence is ultimately up to you, but do not claim that there is none... and I would submit to you that many people believe many things without evidence every single day... but do not lump all people of faith into one basket... I have personal proof that God exists, but proof for me may not be proof for you, some people can see something with their own eyes and still deny it, that is why I said it is ultimately up to you to decide what you believe... there is much evidence both for and against the existence of God, you need to decide which evidence you choose to believe...

Now chad, I don't expect you to see just how idiotic that statement is, you've proven yourself to be immovable when it comes to stupidity so I'll just leave you with this, I positively believe that god is not real, but I don't have proof to prove otherwise so I don't spend any time on it.

He told me its real and He said if you want proof, im going to have to find a professional polygraph operator (lie detection operator) and see with my own eyes that its not a joke.

Even though he knew the truth and saw with his own eyes the proof that Jesus was the Messiah, he cared so little that he'd let Jesus be killed if it meant he could profit off of it.

Non-believers see a godless world, walk with the things of man, accept only the proof of man, can not see miracles, can not see answered prayer and basically have only the presence and perspective of Richard Dawkins bible.

What religion offers: — The opportunity to avoid eternal punishment for not worshiping / believing in my god (not worried enough to care)-- An explanation for the universe and why we are here (I'll take the knowledge gained from the application of the scientific method, but thanks)-- Living forever in heavenly bliss (I am content with this life)-- The opportunity to divide humanity based upon different belief systems (There is enough dividing us already)-- Purpose, a code of ethics, and fulfillment (I have that already, without religion)-- Develop a personal relationship with god (I've never seen or heard from any gods nor have I seen any independantly verified scientifically collected peer reviewed proof.

See, you just love to assume things you have no proof of, no knowledge of, and no way of grasping them with your lack of cognitive abilities.

To be deep in history is certainly, for instance, to cease to be an evangelical of the kind who allows experience to trump doctrine, who believes doctrine can be read off the surface of the biblical text, and who sees no theological or existential problem that can not be solved with a proof text or two.

Really funny take the whole thing and line by line call it a lie with no proof you are the liar and deciever and anyone that researches it will see the truth and it wont be yours

How many of you can with imagination and mathematics create a theory and 30 years later see proof that you were right?

While I am not religious (I will call myself agnostic), and having an IQ well over genius levels, with scientific and mathematical tendencies, let me ask you a few questions, because what I see here are a bunch of people talking about «no evidence» or «proof» of God's existence, therefore He can't possibly exist, existential arguments, which are not arguments, but fearful, clouded alterations of a truth that can not be seen.

The key is this, when you are an athiest and want to see the proof of God, simply follow the Christian code to be honest with God.

If someone claims that they saw superman leaping over tall buildings in a single bound today, the burden of proof would obviously lie with the ones making the claim, and not with the ones that discounted it.

Can't you see Unknown, sitting and rocking repet itively, with his fingers in his ears, chanting, «The burden of proof is on you to show God doesn't exist», as if that will make it true.

It's alright for you to be so cynical with proof, but a theory and discredit the proof of God's existence even in the things you can see with your eye.

Moreover, the fact that, with the exception of Paul, only those who had already been followers of the earthly Jesus are reported to have seen the risen Christ appear to them, suggests that the Easter message was not something which could be pressed home by means of any objective proofs.

Given that evolution is forced to be taught in classrooms, with no proof, I guess I can't see how anyone would leave God, for nothing, especially when they're forced to believe it.

For the Fathers and for the theologians of the Middle Ages, it was clear that the Greek word hypostasis was to be rendered in Latin with the term substantia -LSB-...] faith is the «substance» of things hoped for; the proof of things not seen.

@Donovan... I speak only for my experience and not to convert anyone... I study biochemistry, I work on a membrane protein that requires proof, it requires pictures of gels and actual empirical data... I have no problem with this fact based way of seeing life...

i see no proof of your statements, at least science has the integrity to admitt to whatever being only a theory and not fact — your BELIEF is nothing but a thought you hold on to like a baby and there special blanky... sceince attempts to prove or even to disprove itself, you just go on believing what some silk covered so called humble man with gold in his pockets tells you.

If you want to say that faith is about believing in this rubbish with no proof, no rational, I suggest that you break your arm and pray it better, see how that works for you.

But as he's entirely unnecessary to explain the world as I experience it, comes equipped with no proof for his existence, and is morally repugnant, I see no reason to base my life around the unfounded assumption that he's sitting around judging me.

«You may have an opinion that a man is inspired, but you can not prove it, nor can you have any proof of it yourself, because you can not see into his mind in order to know how he comes by his thoughts; and the same is the case with the word revelation.

With no metaphysics, no magic, no influence from mental exertions like praying, etc. to be seen even at the quantum level, any and all claims to the contrary, including your whiny «oh it might exist» bullshit, require proof to the contrary because the field has already been cleared.

My house is located on a small mountain and I can see the lights of the city at night on the terrace while enjoying a glass a generous portion of DeLeón ® Extra-Añejo tequila at 108 proof over cubes of ice prepared with pure water.

We see it with the retail customers: People today care how their bread tastes, how it's shaped, scored, proofed and baked.

I think adding everything to a bread machine takes the fun away from seeing how your bread comes to life, starting with the proofing of the yeast, letting it rise, shaping it and finally waiting for the loaf to be baked...

For proof see here: pumpkin pie, pumpkin spice ice cream, pumpkin muffins, pumpkin layer cake, pumpkin loaf in a pumpkin pan, pumpkin cupcakes with cream cheese icing, simple pumpkin soup, or pumpkin pull - apart bread!

Hi Hannah ~ I am wondering if you proofed your yeast with warm water and saw bubbles frothing.

This sweet potato hash with shaved Brussels sprouts and a fried egg is the proof you'll need to see just how true... VIEW POST

To make the base, first gently melt the coconut oil by placing it in a heat proof bowl set over a pan of steaming water with the heat turned off (see note below).

With seal facing down (see picture 7), place in the loaf tins to have the 2nd round of proofing.

2 ounces Riazul Silver Tequila * 2 ounces Fresh squeeze orange juice 1/2 ounce homemade grenadine (see below, or subsitute with Rose's Grenadine) Optional: 1 tablespoon 80 - proof mescal

SEE MORE: Robbed: Proof Manchester City got extremely lucky with offside third goal against Arsenal RIP Wengerball: Pic sums up how far Arsenal have fallen as Wenger parks the bus vs Manchester City «7 - 0 incoming» — Arsenal fans preparing for bad day against Man City after shock Wenger decision

(Scores, defends, creates off the dribble and sets up chances for his team - mates) With Ospina we had a great reactive keeper, crazy reflexes and didn't really put a foot wrong but although we didn't see that many errors resulting in conceding, the proof was there that there were a lot of short - comings in his game.

Forgot about Xhaka there when I proof read it, Xhaka needs to reinvent himself and who knows maybe with some competition we would see Xabi Alonso feat Pirlo.

SEE MORE: Arsenal Transfer News Lukas Podolski Backtracks On Arsenal Criticism As Loan Move Fails Proof Chelsea Star Cesc Fabregas Still Loves Arsenal More Than Blues «It's a pleasure to play with the boys and I think we are really strong offensively,» Giroud told Arsenal.com

It is a recurring and terrifying trope of such matters that «the real problem is false allegations of racism, rather than racism» (see also: every other kind of discrimination, rape), and so to equate a lack of proof with falsehood.

SEE MORE: Arsene Wenger admits Alexis Sanchez found it difficult playing for Arsenal against Manchester City Man City 3 - 1 Arsenal player ratings, stats and reaction: City ace joins elite club following win as Guardiola's side continue dominance Robbed: Proof Manchester City got extremely lucky with offside third goal against Arsenal

I just saw him make so many special plays with the ball in his hand that Davis is pretty close to bust proof in my eyes, even with the drops.

SEE ALSO: Olivier Giroud Arsenal: Proof his big - game record is not the Gunners» biggest problem EA Team of the Year announced: Arsenal star replaces Coutinho, Chelsea ace makes way for Aguero Get Manchester United highlights with our FREE Football video app!