Because those of us who
see these things for what they are (unconst.itutional, unethical, sometimes immoral) are too «respectful» of these traditions.
Acceptance offers the perspective to
see things for what they are and to strategize to make things more manageable.
When you have struggled with sickness and disability, you really
see things for what they are.
But I guess he's schmoozing for a job, and you don't do that by telling the truth or
seeing things for what they are.
Hopefully the delusional Lemmings, Will
see things for what they are, Same old?
I don't think being realistic and
seeing things for what they are can be seen as being negative.I accept that luck often plays a part but I also believe that you make your own luck.You say, correctly, «early in the season all our shots went in» — but yesterday we weren't taking shots!
They see these things for what they are — crap that tastes like chemicals and preservatives, that have absolutely no nutritional value, and that actually do more harm than good.
We'll be taking a look at some other tactics popular with the opposition in forthcoming posts, but to
see these things for what they really are, you need not to pick the odd cherry here and there, but step back and look at the reality of the whole tree.
Understanding theory and doctrine are critical to the trial judge's work, but
seeing things for what they truly are and saying so is equally important.
This is crucial as in the midst of daily life, the couple are unable to think clearly and
see things for what they are.
Not exact matches
«Today in the universe of search, you type
what you are looking
for, tomorrow as we talk about something, you will
see the relevant
things come to
what we talk about.»
Instead,
what my boss
saw was a black woman who had made a dubious request
for time off to attend a distant relative's funeral and was now sitting next to a box of
things he couldn't possibly imagine her needing.
«It's a good
thing to get new businesses, but
for mature mom - and - pops, I don't
see it being any more stimulative than
what is now in the economy.
If we've learned one
thing about the TV business over the past year, it's that almost everything that was once written in stone is now up
for grabs, including who is in control and
what they
see as their end goal.
«But
what I
see is a president who is fighting
for the
things that I'm fighting
for.
And
for me it's just a matter of I like to try new
things and just
see it as more of an enabler and
what that would bring into the future.»
They constantly try new
things, to
see what works best
for them.
Following the money is always the best way to
see what interests a rich man because it tells you two
things —
what he likes as an investment
for future growth, and
what he
sees as having reached the limits of growth.
Great CEOs are always trying to
see what's next — the
thing around the corner that they need to prepare their business
for.
KERNEN: But the one
thing most are bringing up — and then I want to tell you about — if you didn't
see the Jamie Dimon and the Lloyd Blankfein interview, I want to just tell you
what they said about the potential
for GDP growth...
«So even as innovation is producing wonderful
things for consumers — you know, mobile phones instead of pay phones, email instead of snail mail, taxis at the press of a button —
what you also
see is that companies now have much higher odds of dying and dying suddenly,» says Vedantam.
Simply,
what you're interested in —
what you're interested in doing, buying,
seeing, selling and voting
for, among other
things.
«I've
seen other guys do similar
things to
what I did
for my laptop.
«The approach at BuzzFeed is always try
things out and
see what happens, and after running a separate Canada office
for awhile, it became clear that Canadians still liked the global stuff and didn't necessarily want just Canadian stuff,» Silverman said.
But because of the labour situation in Mexico, the easiest
thing for us to do was to put some nannies in there and
see what happens.
Fredrick Petrie, author of «The End of Work: Financial Planning
for People With Better
Things To Do,» recommends «taxing» yourself in order to get more money out of your wallet and into the bank — this way you'll make savings a priority from the get - go, rather than budgeting everything else first and then
seeing what is left over
for savings.
Even if you have no idea
what you want to do while on your break, using TripScope you can set preferences to a general outline of
things you like or want to
see,
for example: beaches, zip - lining and nightlife and your pro agent can give you ideas.
Take one
thing at a time and
see what works best
for you.
[16:00] Pain + reflection = progress [16:30] Creating a meritocracy to draw the best out of everybody [18:30] How to raise your probability of being right [18:50] Why we are conditioned to need to be right [19:30] The neuroscience factor [19:50] The habitual and environmental factor [20:20] How to get to the other side [21:20] Great collective decision - making [21:50] The 5
things you need to be successful [21:55] Create audacious goals [22:15] Why you need problems [22:25] Diagnose the problems to determine the root causes [22:50] Determine the design
for what you will do about the root causes [23:00] Decide to work with people who are strong where you are weak [23:15] Push through to results [23:20] The loop of success [24:15] Ray's new instinctual approach to failure [24:40] Tony's ritual after every event [25:30] The review that changed Ray's outlook on leadership [27:30] Creating new policies based on fairness and truth [28:00] What people are missing about Ray's culture [29:30] Creating meaningful work and meaningful relationships [30:15] The importance of radical honesty [30:50] Thoughtful disagreement [32:10] Why it was the relationships that changed Ray's life [33:10] Ray's biggest weakness and how he overcame it [34:30] The jungle metaphor [36:00] The dot collector — deciding what to listen to [40:15] The wanting of meritocratic decision - making [41:40] How to see bubbles and busts [42:40] Productivity [43:00] Where we are in the cycle [43:40] What the Fed will do [44:05] We are late in the long - term debt cycle [44:30] Long - term debt is going to be squeezing us [45:00] We have 2 economies [45:30] This year is very similar to 1937 [46:10] The top tenth of the top 1 % of wealth = bottom 90 % combined [46:25] How this creates populism [47:00] The economy for the bottom 60 % isn't growing [48:20] If you look at averages, the country is in a bind [49:10] What are the overarching principles that bind us toget
what you will do about the root causes [23:00] Decide to work with people who are strong where you are weak [23:15] Push through to results [23:20] The loop of success [24:15] Ray's new instinctual approach to failure [24:40] Tony's ritual after every event [25:30] The review that changed Ray's outlook on leadership [27:30] Creating new policies based on fairness and truth [28:00]
What people are missing about Ray's culture [29:30] Creating meaningful work and meaningful relationships [30:15] The importance of radical honesty [30:50] Thoughtful disagreement [32:10] Why it was the relationships that changed Ray's life [33:10] Ray's biggest weakness and how he overcame it [34:30] The jungle metaphor [36:00] The dot collector — deciding what to listen to [40:15] The wanting of meritocratic decision - making [41:40] How to see bubbles and busts [42:40] Productivity [43:00] Where we are in the cycle [43:40] What the Fed will do [44:05] We are late in the long - term debt cycle [44:30] Long - term debt is going to be squeezing us [45:00] We have 2 economies [45:30] This year is very similar to 1937 [46:10] The top tenth of the top 1 % of wealth = bottom 90 % combined [46:25] How this creates populism [47:00] The economy for the bottom 60 % isn't growing [48:20] If you look at averages, the country is in a bind [49:10] What are the overarching principles that bind us toget
What people are missing about Ray's culture [29:30] Creating meaningful work and meaningful relationships [30:15] The importance of radical honesty [30:50] Thoughtful disagreement [32:10] Why it was the relationships that changed Ray's life [33:10] Ray's biggest weakness and how he overcame it [34:30] The jungle metaphor [36:00] The dot collector — deciding
what to listen to [40:15] The wanting of meritocratic decision - making [41:40] How to see bubbles and busts [42:40] Productivity [43:00] Where we are in the cycle [43:40] What the Fed will do [44:05] We are late in the long - term debt cycle [44:30] Long - term debt is going to be squeezing us [45:00] We have 2 economies [45:30] This year is very similar to 1937 [46:10] The top tenth of the top 1 % of wealth = bottom 90 % combined [46:25] How this creates populism [47:00] The economy for the bottom 60 % isn't growing [48:20] If you look at averages, the country is in a bind [49:10] What are the overarching principles that bind us toget
what to listen to [40:15] The wanting of meritocratic decision - making [41:40] How to
see bubbles and busts [42:40] Productivity [43:00] Where we are in the cycle [43:40]
What the Fed will do [44:05] We are late in the long - term debt cycle [44:30] Long - term debt is going to be squeezing us [45:00] We have 2 economies [45:30] This year is very similar to 1937 [46:10] The top tenth of the top 1 % of wealth = bottom 90 % combined [46:25] How this creates populism [47:00] The economy for the bottom 60 % isn't growing [48:20] If you look at averages, the country is in a bind [49:10] What are the overarching principles that bind us toget
What the Fed will do [44:05] We are late in the long - term debt cycle [44:30] Long - term debt is going to be squeezing us [45:00] We have 2 economies [45:30] This year is very similar to 1937 [46:10] The top tenth of the top 1 % of wealth = bottom 90 % combined [46:25] How this creates populism [47:00] The economy
for the bottom 60 % isn't growing [48:20] If you look at averages, the country is in a bind [49:10]
What are the overarching principles that bind us toget
What are the overarching principles that bind us together?
When you read news sites like Search Engine Land and Search Engine Roundtable and
see penalties handed out left & right
for things that seemed generally white hat just a few years ago, you can't help but think «maybe
what I've thought
for so long that's completely white hat is targeted next?»
Zuckerberg was asked by US lawmakers last week
what kind of regulation he would and wouldn't like to
see laid upon Internet companies — and he made a point of arguing
for privacy carve outs to avoid falling behind, of all
things, competitors in China.
There's no way
for us to accurately create a plan without knowing who you are, how you do
things,
what you've done, and
what type of results you're currently
seeing.
We have all done many
things to make money,
what worked best
for you last year & do you
see anything different
for 2015!
I especially liked a couple of points you raised in the One More
Thing section, where you wrote: «
What if someone who has a great idea
for a project only found out after
seeing the calendar?
Matt asks:»...
What I'd like to
see from you and the other prophets of social media publish are the top 10
things I can do immediately that will help me spread the gospel of home ownership and drive brand preference to CENTURY 21...» Interestingly, my response quickly reached the first page of the Google results
for the phrase «Century 21 Real Estate» a company with 8,000 offices worldwide, proof that new marketing works.
When he had to squeeze extra floors into a new building, he called Sandy Lindenbaum, a zoning - law guru who called himself «the last of the gunslingers»; when he needed the New Jersey Casino Control Commission to
see things his way, he turned to Atlantic City fixture Nick Ribis; when he wanted to divorce Ivana (and, later on, her successor, Marla Maples), he retained Jay Goldberg, a self - described «killer» who says he can «rip skin off a body»; when it was tax time, he reversed decades of bragging about his billions and had tax attorneys say his properties were worth only a fraction of
what he had publicly proclaimed (an ongoing tax appeal in Chicago declares Trump Tower Chicago «a failed business»); when he was in the market
for a troubleshooter, he hired Michael Cohen, who has threatened journalists who've written about Trump with bodily harm.
And I reckon, it's sort of interesting
for me
for private equity in terms of all we've
seen, and
what we have
seen, where we have
seen some misconduct and
things like that,»cause I always think like, to my simple mind, that the people in private equity, they're the greatest, they're actually adding value to their clients, they're getting paid really really well, you know, if I was in that position, the one
thing I would think to myself as I skipped to work was like just «Let's not mess it up.
But the whole
thing left Albertans smarting over
what they
see as B.C.'s parochial disregard
for their economic livelihood.
We all but ripped the
thing out of the packaging in a rush to
see for ourselves
what «unleashing the wizard within» would look like.
He brushed the idea off at the time, but when names like Jason Kenney and Donna Kennedy - Glans started coming up
for the role he didn't like
what he
saw, which he considered to be the same old
thing for the party.
From
what I can
see,
things haven't been going well
for Alberta and are about to get worse.
I think anyone that any Christian who looks at
what Jesus message was said to be, and any other person who just looks at
what the right
thing to do
for someone who needs comfort is, instead of focusing on absurd man made rituals, would
see that the priest was very much at fault here.
«Faith is the realization of
what is hoped
for and evidence of
things not
seen» (Heb 11:1).
There is ample evidence
for the existence of God,
what you decide to do with this evidence is ultimately up to you, but do not claim that there is none... and I would submit to you that many people believe many
things without evidence every single day... but do not lump all people of faith into one basket... I have personal proof that God exists, but proof
for me may not be proof
for you, some people can
see something with their own eyes and still deny it, that is why I said it is ultimately up to you to decide
what you believe... there is much evidence both
for and against the existence of God, you need to decide which evidence you choose to believe...
I wouldn't fault someone
for not
seeing an invisible
thing (huge kudos to scientists who made the invisible, visible), I do fault people
for denying
what is right under their noses.
For one
thing, I'm a Christian and from
what I've
seen many of the most outspoken Christians are the whiniest about any other faith getting a good word.
I guess I've always had a confidence in God and faith; you know, it's almost like God saying, «Just hold on Andy; wait until we
see what happens,» and the
things we've been praying
for, obviously, God's answering those prayers... the licensing
thing on the album with it coming out on the final Matrix trailer and
things like that.
Lenn, your comments against God, here's
what it sounded like to me: I
saw a Lamborghini drive up, and the first
thing I wanted to do was throw up in it, take out a hammer and smash it's windows in, and then set it on fire, because it's too perfect and fast
for my tastes... roughly and crudely translated.
There are those who think that the Christian religion is
what we should smile at rather than hold fast,
for this reason, that, in it, not
what may be
seen, is shown, but men are commanded faith of
things which are not
seen.
You are comparing
things that I
see as two different categorys.One is using a record recorded in the bible,
for determining creationism, (or
what caused the «big bang» as some believe) in regards to science, and
what can be proven, in that respect.