An unsecured creditor takes on more risk than a secured creditor because it does not have the ability to
seize an asset right away if a borrower fails to repay the debt.
Not exact matches
Without the
right to
seize assets in the event of a default, banks were scared away.
Because most SBA loans are secured by collateral and a personal guarantee, the bank will have the
right to
seize the business and personal
assets you pledged.
If you go into default on the loan, your lender will have the
right to
seize or foreclose on those
assets.
US considering limits on China's tech investments The US Department of the Treasury is considering deploying a little - used law known as the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to potentially block transactions and
seize assets if President Trump declares China's violation of US intellectual property
rights a national emergency.
If you go into default on the loan, your lender will have the
right to
seize or foreclose on those
assets.
In case of default, the lender has the
right to
seize and foreclose the
asset, sell, and / or auction it in order to cover the loaned amount.
They are being told they must act fast to deal with an outstanding tax debt owed to CRA and if they do not pay something
right away their
assets will be
seized or they may go to jail.
And take action means taking you to court, having a payment hearing and then getting the
right to
seize your
assets or your income.
Within the past decade, banking and insurance companies have hired historical legal experts and spent a lot of time litigation over the US Federal Court system's power to issue equitable remedies such as the Mareva injunction and equitable liens to
seize assets in federal litigation; the Alien Torts Act which has been used by international human
rights organizations had its breadth restricted by use of 18th century views of the «law of nations» requiring recourse to historic writers like Hugo Grotius, and even administrative law has come under assault by dissents of Justice Thomas arguing that the «Chevron» doctrine of deference to agency interpretations of their own statutes should be set aside as being incompatible with the understanding of the American separation of powers doctrine as it was understood at the time of the country's founding.
A decision from the Wisconsin Supreme Court establishing the
right of an unsecured creditor to have a sheriff
seize and execute upon a court judgment against the
assets of a debtor and forcing a judicial sale to find an equity in excess of the
rights and value of an existing security interest held by a secured creditor in the subject
assets.
Do they have the
right tools and full visibility of detailed
asset information, so if an opportunity arises you're able to
seize it quickly?