There's no reason we can't do this for everyone, letting gifted students soar without the downsides of
selective gifted programs.
Not exact matches
Yet the (all too meager) research and evaluation that have been conducted in this realm — both in the United States and overseas — yield a mixed picture when it comes to the academic «value added» by
gifted - and - talented
programs and
selective - admission schools.
That is to say, disadvantaged kids, however able they may be, are indeed at a disadvantage in terms of accessing
gifted programs, supplemental activities, and
selective schools.
Selective - admissions magnet schools are the best example, but you can find explicit enrollment criteria in other district
programs, too, including
gifted - and - talented initiatives and some career - and technical - education options.
My criticism extends to
gifted and talented
programs and
selective high schools that exist in districts across the country.
As we seek ways to serve disadvantaged yet
gifted students better, it must also be acknowledged that the few evaluations done thus far of
gifted - education
programs and
selective - admission high schools raise questions about their effectiveness.