Selective use of evidence, overlooking the root causes of incarceration, and ignoring Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people's evidence all contribute to lack of accountability, and lack of progress.
On the methane data, when you assume that the only accurate data is the data you want to believe, it is a kind of
selective use of evidence that is, as you say, «no better than the deniers.»»
History always uses abridgment and
selective use of evidence / events, but bad history does this to bolster a pre-determined narrative (usually progress, or the battle between the good and the bad, the true and the false).
They employed accusations of scientific conspiracy,
selective use of evidence and dissenting scientists to contradict public health experts and confuse the public.
Sanchez and Lawler identify many other examples of
the selective use of evidence.
Not exact matches
The tendency
of contemporary evangelicals to appeal to tradition to support conservative positions would be checked by Wesley's far more
selective use of tradition, and much greater openness to current
evidence.
ALDI Nord GmbH's Trader Joe's chain, The Kroger Co., and Whole Foods Market Inc. opted to shun
selective food additives such as synthetic colors, preservatives, stabilizers, emulsifiers, and naturally occurring texturizers such as carrageenan (from seaweed) even though scientific literature reported that rigorous double - blind studies have not found
evidence of these ingredients provoking true allergic reactions or health - or life - threatening reactions with prolonged
use.
Based on 20 + years
of experience treating SM
using Social Communication Anxiety Treatment ® (S - CAT ®), the
evidence - based treatment approach created by world - renowned
Selective Mutism expert, Dr. Elisa Shipon - Blum, we will help your child build the social communication skills necessary for school, the real...
The Child Mind Institute's
Selective Mutism Service is an innovative program that helps children with SM overcome their symptoms
using state
of the art
evidence - based behavioral interventions.
Let's ensure that parents receive the right guidance and support from professionals who are fully trained in the area
of Selective Mutism, and who are
using evidence based treatment that is proven to work.
The
evidence used to adduce the negative impact
of undermatch is that students attending less -
selective institutions than they were qualified to attend graduated at lower rates than similar students attending more -
selective institutions.
Specification points covered are: Paper 2 Topic 1 (4.5 - homeostasis and response) 4.5.1 - Homeostasis (B5.1 lesson) 4.5.3.2 - Control
of blood glucose concentration (B5.1 lesson) 4.5.2.1 - Structure and function (B5.2 lesson) Required practical 7 - plan and carry out an investigation into the effect
of a factor on human reaction time (B5.2 lesson) 4.5.3.1 - Human endocrine system (B5.6 lesson) 4.5.3.4 - Hormones in human reproduction (B5.10 lesson) 4.5.3.5 - Contraception (B5.11 lesson) 4.5.3.6 - The
use of hormones to treat infertility (HT only)(B5.12 lesson) 4.5.3.7 - Negative feedback (HT only)(B5.13 lesson) Paper 2 topic 2 (4.6 - Inheritance, variation and evolution) 4.6.1.1 - sexual and asexual reproduction (B6.1 lesson) 4.6.1.2 - Meiosis (B6.1 lesson) 4.6.1.4 - DNA and the genome (B6.3 lesson) 4.6.1.6 - Genetic inheritance (B6.5 lesson) 4.6.1.7 - Inherited disorders (B6.6 lesson) 4.6.1.8 - Sex determination (B6.5 lesson) 4.6.2.1 - Variation (B6.9 lesson) 4.6.2.2 - Evolution (B6.10 lesson) 4.6.2.3 -
Selective breeding (B6.11 lesson) 4.6.2.4 - Genetic engineering (B6.11 lesson) 4.6.3.4 -
Evidence for evolution (B6.16 lesson) 4.6.3.5 - Fossils (B6.16 lesson) 4.6.3.6 - Extinction (B6.16 lesson) 4.6.3.7 - Resistant bacteria (B6.17 lesson) 4.6.4.1 - classification
of living organisms (B6.18 lesson) Paper 2 topic 3 (4.7 - Ecology 4.7.1.1 - Communities (B7.1 lesson) 4.7.1.2 - Abiotic factors (B7.1 lesson) 4.7.1.3 - Biotic factors (B7.1 lesson) 4.7.1.4 — Adaptations (B7.2 lesson) 4.7.2.1 - Levels
of organisation (feeding relationships + predator - prey cycles)(B7.3 lesson) 4.7.2.1 - Levels
of organisation (required practical 9 - population sizes)(B7.4 lesson) 4.7.2.2 - How materials are cycled (B7.5 lesson) 4.7.3.1 - Biodiversity (B7.7 lesson) 4.7.3.6 - Maintaining Biodiversity (B7.7 lesson) 4.7.3.2 - Waste management (B7.9 lesson) 4.7.3.3 - Land
use (B7.9 lesson) 4.7.3.4 - Deforestation (B7.9 lesson) 4.7.3.5 - Global warming (B7.9 lesson)
To probe these questions, The Wallace Foundation in 2011 launched a five - year, $ 75 million initiative to help six large districts build stronger principal pipelines by (1) creating clear job requirements detailing what principals and assistant principals must know and do, (2) ensuring high - quality training for aspiring leaders, (3) developing more
selective hiring procedures, and (4)
using well - crafted evaluations to identify the needs
of principals and ongoing support to address them.79 Over the life
of the initiative, it is expected that participating districts will have filled at least two - thirds
of their principal slots with graduates
of high - quality training programs - enough to enable independent researchers to gather meaningful
evidence on whether and how better leadership can transform the academic fortunes
of children.
Authored by Vikki Boliver, Claire Crawford, Mandy Powell and Will Craige, this report provides new
evidence on the
use of contextualised admissions amongst a group
of highly
selective universities in the UK today, and offers some insights into the difference that greater
use of contextual data might make to the numbers
of disadvantaged students at these universities.
He
uses pretty damning
evidence to make his case for the phenomenon
of «
selective» risk perception.
Defending climatologists and thousands
of other scientists, Barry Brook, who heads Adelaide University's Research Institute for Climate Change and Sustainability, poured cold water on Professor Plimer's book and said his colleague had only
used «
selective evidence» when quoting more than 200 scientists and from peer - reviewed papers.
Other than
using hearsay and anecdotal
evidence and
selective opinions, there's not much substance to her entire article's body, including the last paragraph
of pure speculations:
(2) thou shalt not fudge the data (3) thou shalt not invent arbitrary statistical methods to suit thy data (4) thou shalt not indulge in any form
of bias e.g. thou shalt not employ incomplete, highly
selective, subjective literature reviews (6) in the interests
of transparency and replication thou shalt not hide the data or code (7) thou shalt not make vague or exaggerated statements unsupported by
evidence (8) thou shalt not tolerate actual or potential conflicts
of interest (9) thou shalt not allow political interference to compromise scientific integrity (10) thou shalt not
use unvalidated computer models (11) Thy university shall insulate undergraduate fees from research expenses and require research to be self supporting independent
of the teaching.
(2) thou shalt not fudge the data (3) thou shalt not invent arbitrary statistical methods to suit thy data (4) thou shalt not indulge in any form
of bias e.g. thou shalt not employ incomplete, highly
selective, subjective literature reviews (5) thou shalt not exaggerate (6) in the interests
of transparency and replication thou shalt not hide the data or code (7) thou shalt not make vague statements unsupported by
evidence (8) thou shalt not tolerate actual or potential conflicts
of interest (9) thou shalt not allow political interference to compromise scientific integrity (10) thou shalt not
use unvalidated computer models
Many tribunal summary proceedings do not include oral
evidence, and the court seems to be opening the door to the
selective use of oral testimony in summary proceedings.