Sentences with phrase «sell at these prices means»

The fact that they seem to sell at these prices means there is a market out there for them.

Not exact matches

«It means you have misallocation of resources, it means that ultimately, the only way to clear the market is to sell things at a price that is below what the world market price would otherwise be.»
The robotic system may sound contrived and gimmicky, but for Eatsa founder Dave Friedberg, the tech - driven approach is a means to support a bigger mission: selling nutritious and sustainable food at a reasonable price.
It's trading at what Lash says is fair value, but she has a sell price target on it of $ 71.55, meaning it is possible for the stock to head higher.
That means traders who bought the options per Quigg's recommendation were already set to make a profit: If they exercise their option to sell the shares at the higher strike price and then buy at a lower price, they profit with the difference.
Let's say we are looking to sell the USD / CHF, this means we will be working with the «bid» price of 0.9191, or the rate at which the market is prepared to buy from you.
LONG — When we go long it means we are buying the market and so we want the market to rise so that we can then sell back our position at a higher price than we bought for.
SHORT — When we go short it means we are selling the market and so we want the market to fall so that we can then buy back our position at a lower price than we sold it for.
Executives also complain that their salespeople can not sell the value of their products which means they sell at a less than desirable price point.
The relative lack of liquidity in the bond market and the fact that it is oriented for institutional investors rather than retail investors means that you really want to know where a bond has been trading before agreeing to buy or sell at a given price (be careful not to get ripped off).
CAPE indicates stocks are currently valued at nearly twice what they have been in the past, but even Shiller himself admitted earlier this year that high stock prices don't necessarily mean it's time to sell.
High tariffs at the American border had meant that farmers were forced to sell their agricultural products at lower prices, and buy farm implements at higher prices.
Liquidity Is Key In The Financial Markets $ SPY, $ DIA, $ QQQ For the last many months there has been a focus on liquidity in the financial markets, meaning, how easily participants will be able to buy or sell securities at a given price.
I thought ROFR means when an investor / founder is trying to sell its share to any other third party, the company have the right to purchase from the selling investor / founder the shares it intents to sell at a matching price.
What this means is that if the share price falls 2 % from the market price, then a sell order would be executed for you, allowing taking the profit at that time and leaving you with no risk on the downside.
This means that blindly selling short $ QQQ (or buying an inversely correlated «short ETF») at the current price level of $ QQQ is risky and not advisable.
to stop your loss Profit target means you should sell at those prices.
This means, rather than having to sell our HII shares if they closed above the strike price, with put options, we would have to buy HII shares if they closed below the strike price — which would be a good thing since we could add HII back to our portfolio at a much lower price.
This forces all of them to seek ever more efficient means of production and to sell their products at the lowest possible price.
I was talking to a person if he went to church and he stated all they want is your money.You got to give your money to read books about GOD, I mean like thirty dollars and more and the same for a dvd or like if you could give 1,000 or more to keep on the air.He and I both think we are better off stay at home and read the Bible and study it.I think if you are born with the new sperit of GOD you will understand the Bible without the loss of great somes of money.After they sell so many dvds it becomes 100 % profit and they never lower the price so can obtain one.For this is wrong, it states in the Bible that this would happen preachers for money to learn about everyones GOD.They forgot one thing JESUS never forced money from you to hear the wordof salvation Im a follower of JESUS CHRIST OUR LORD He is the way.Im not a so called Christian just.
Operators can capitalize on leftovers by selling larger meals at higher price points, pointing out that these menu items are meant to be eaten in multiple sittings.
but, im ok with this vardy transfer... it shows us many things: 1) wenger is changing, something some of us have been demanding for a long time; 2) it shows that wenger is taking risks: think about it, he is buying a men for a not cheap price, knowing he could not getting anything after, with a future sell i mean... this is an act that shows wengers intentions to win something, the buy is not motivated by any financial or economic reason but only for a «get the f epl once again» reason... this is an act that shows us hungry, even if we fail, we could said we try... first ever, we really try; 3) finally but very important... vardy is the kind of player we need... he is a warrior, a fighter... he has character... look at how he celebrate his goals... full of energy... he, like alexis, can motivate the team when the things are not going in our way (something wenger cant do because of his age and because he has never been an active coach on the pitch)... the vardy transfer, if it finish well, is a demostration of a change, and a good one... lets take care of winning things and do nt look the economic side for once... vardy is a bit old, but we can give a chance to welbeck after maybe, or akpom... u are not thinking about the future when we talk about ibra... guys: u complain when wenger do nt spend or because he is always looking for the bargain when u are the guys who has to pay the very expensive tickets... u complain when wenger buy the always for the future guy... like morata... stop to complain for everything and be consequent with yourself... i would love auba, but it is not going to happen... lukaku is awesome but the asking price is stupid... lets try with vardy, give us the throphy..
What I was saying is that Arsenal could not afford two big name signings considering what had been spent on replacing keeper, RB, CB, and CF.. In addition Arsenal had a right of first refusal meaning that it would not have had influence over the price at which Fab would be sold.
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
«The implication of that is that if you are holding a stock of Enterprise at the stock exchange at Ghc2 and it is now being sold at almost three, seven times so, it means that your stock on the stock exchange has been undervalued and therefore putting pressure on people to rush for Enterprise Insurance shares and for which reason Enterprise Insurance will now begin to see an increase in the price of their share, not reflected by the fundamentals of the performance of the economy but by a manipulated process outside of the trading regime without clearance from the Securities and Exchanges Commission.
«Today's decision means pubs will continue to close as they are undercut by supermarkets selling canned beers at pocket money prices.
That means that you can sell at any price and include in it your transportation cost without any government intervention — that is not the way to go.
By selling such a high quality product at an affordable price, we not only positively affect the lives of our customers, it also gives us the financial means by which we can help those who are less fortunate to live a happier, healthier, and more productive life.»
What I actually meant by it is cheaper to make your own healthy snacks becomes quite obvious if you start looking at the price tags of healthy energy balls sold in the supermarkets.
And, I mean, almost all of my purchases were made on shoes that are currently being sold in stores at full price.
We'll show you why we are # 1 - Why we sell more new Buick GMC vehicles than anyone else in Oregon or Washington and why that means we have a better inventory of pre-owned vehicles, including fresh trade - ins at the best prices.
That means if you're looking for a part the chances are that we'll be able to get it for you faster than anybody else, and we'll sell it to you at a competitive price.
But because dealers were selling so many of the Integras — enough so that the car's demise could have meant the difference between profit and loss for some dealers — Acura decided to replace the Integra with the RSX at a price close to that of the Integra.
It sells well thanks to competitive pricing at the dealer (meaning the selling price, not the list price).
This means we primarily sell to dealers at rock - bottom vehicle prices, but we offer those same vehicles and prices to the public through our website.
This means an ebook under 50,000 words priced at $ 2.99 might be considered too expensive on Amazon, but may sell well on Kobo.
This means you sell your book to Ingram at 55 percent off the retail price, and it passes along 40 percent of that discount to the retailer and keeps 15 percent for itself.
Selling your book at wholesale pricing does mean you make less per sale, but the tradeoff is that your book is available to a wider audience and through more diverse channels.
Initially, publishers set their e-book list prices at a few dollars off the print price, and then gave Amazon a 50 percent discount, meaning that Amazon was receiving new books at an average wholesale price of about $ 12 — and was selling them for $ 9.99 and below.
Under that 1981 law, books in the country were sold at a fixed price, which was meant to protect small booksellers from the ravages of big box discount stores and retail chains that were already cropping up even then.
What TJ Maxx is believed to be up to is buying the iPad 2s from retailers at the usual price and selling them at a reduced price even if it means incurring losses.
ebooks sell at a lower price point than other information products such as ecourses, which means you have to sell a lot to make money.
If publishers want to impose such enhanced restrictions then they are free to do so (whether by technical means or simply a more restrictive license) but they have to understand that this makes the end product less valuable to the customers, it lowers it's utility, and the only way that might work is if it's sold at a lower price.
«Amazon is a Trojan Horse, offering low prices today — while Wall Street is willing to float a company that doesn't make a profit — at the cost of destroying the [traditional] publishing ecosystem that is indispensable to authors... Amazon actually prevents competition by locking its customers in through devices like Prime and DRM, which means Amazon customers can't read books sold by Apple or Google Play on their Kindles.»
The future with an enforced «everybody selling at our selected price» future means Amazon and B&N sell less Kindles and Nooks because the book lovers are going to see the discounted HC at $ 18 and compare that to an eBook at $ 15 (plus cost of device) and deem it not worth buying a Kindle or Nook edition with its limitations.
Mark went on to mention «If an author can earn the same or greater income selling lower cost books, yet reach significantly more readers, then, drum roll please, it means the authors who are selling higher priced books through traditional publishers are at an extreme disadvantage to indie authors in terms of long term platform building.
* Let's assume, for the moment, that commercial publishers suddenly change their contracting patterns to be simultaneously fairer to the authors and more flexible in their own pricing by redefining «deep discount» to mean «sold at a price less than 200 % of the actual per - copy production cost established by printer invoice.»
«Amazon's pro-consumer pricing meant that to enter the ebooks market Apple would likely be forced to sell at least some ebooks near or below its wholesale costs for an extended period of time.
That was meant to replace the wholesale model, where sellers like Amazon sold ebooks at prices they set themselves, paying publishers flat rates.
At the same time, massive price cuts mean that RIM is losing significant money on every Playbook it does manage to sell.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z