Sentences with phrase «sell copyrighted work»

Just like any traditional publisher, when you sign a publishing contract with FFF Digital, you sign over certain rights so that we can legally distribute and sell the copyrighted work in your name.

But after much litigation over the ownership of public domain works, Google decided to the other route, and deal with publishers, and authors directly to sell copyrighted work and get a take.

This is a rule that means that when a publisher sells a copyrighted work once, it loses any right to complain about anything later done with that copy.

Reserving the right to reproduce and sell copyrighted works is sometimes necessary to continue charitable work.

Not exact matches

The Copyright Act of 1976 further clarified copyright protection: A copyright owner now has the exclusive right to reproduce the work; prepare spin - off works based on the copyrighted work; and to sell, perform and / or display the copyrighted work iCopyright Act of 1976 further clarified copyright protection: A copyright owner now has the exclusive right to reproduce the work; prepare spin - off works based on the copyrighted work; and to sell, perform and / or display the copyrighted work icopyright protection: A copyright owner now has the exclusive right to reproduce the work; prepare spin - off works based on the copyrighted work; and to sell, perform and / or display the copyrighted work icopyright owner now has the exclusive right to reproduce the work; prepare spin - off works based on the copyrighted work; and to sell, perform and / or display the copyrighted work in public.

Except as expressly authorized by us, you agree not to modify, rent, distribute, lease, loan, sell or exploit for any commercial purpose any portion of the Service, use of the Service, or access to the Service, and not to create derivative works based on the Service, in whole or in part for your personal, non-commercial use only, provided you keep intact all copyright and other proprietary notices.

This announcement coincides with Lulu's presence at Book Expo America May 24th - 26th at the Javits Center in New York, where Lulu will empower even more creators to publish for free with complete creative and copyright control over their works, while keeping 80 percent of the profits when their books sell.

A person who can prove a book sold through Kindle's publishing platform is a work whose copyright he owns, and the copyright is being infringed through its unauthorized listing for sale, then Amazon «will pay you the Royalties due in connection with any sales of the Digital Book through the Program, and will remove the Digital Book from future sale through the Program, as your sole and exclusive remedy.»

By posting or uploading any Content on the Website: (i) you understand that if your Work is in aliterary categoryincluded on the Book Country Website, and complies with these General Terms of Use, your Work may be made accessible to users of the Website and members will be able to review, comment on it and rate it; (ii) you represent and warrant that (A) the Content does not contain any libelous matter or matter otherwise contrary to law or violate any rights of privacy or other personal or property right whatsoever and (B) you own or control all rights in your Content, that such Content is original and does not, and will not, infringe the copyright, trademark or any other right of any person or entity, and that any «moral rights» in the Content have been waived; and (iii) you grant to us a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty - free, irrevocable, perpetual, transferable right and license (A) to display the Content on the Website, and (B) with respect to Content other than your Work, to use, display, reproduce, distribute, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, perform, make, sell and export such Content, in whole and in part, on the Website or in any formats and through any media, as we see fit, and you shall have no claims against Book Country for such use or non-use.

If you are the sole owner of the copyright to a work, you are the only one who may lawfully do these things, or sell or license the rights to someone else to do these things.

Copyright prevents unauthorized resellers from copying and selling your work, protecting your earnings as an author.

The spammers would sell plagiarized content of both copyrighted or out of copyright books under their own names, thereby depriving the original author who worked hard to compile the books in the first place.

Now, all my print - only books are ebooks on pirate sites, even though Amazon told me that it never sold any of the illegally created «ebook» versions of my work (except to me) if Amazon lied to me, and if Amazon allows people who illegally bought illegal copies of my works which were created in violation of my copyrights (and for which I was never paid any royalties) do you think those re-sales will be legal?

Copyright is important to us — we want to make sure that no author or other copyright holder has their work claimed and sold by anyCopyright is important to us — we want to make sure that no author or other copyright holder has their work claimed and sold by anycopyright holder has their work claimed and sold by anyone else.

Ever since 1989 in the United States, even if your work is already published and you don't have a copyright notice in it, you still have the copyright (unless you have sold or given it away).

If you're a creative writer (novels, nonfiction, essays, poetry, etc), you don't need to officially register for copyright with the Copyright Office unless you plan to self - publish and / or sell ycopyright with the Copyright Office unless you plan to self - publish and / or sell yCopyright Office unless you plan to self - publish and / or sell your work.

Instead, Bokhylla often gives a second life to works that are still under copyright but sold out at bookshops, said Moe Skarstein.

Traditional publishers will trying other means of rights grabs — possibly with more «House Names» both as work - for - hire and fitting superficially similar books into them, if they are sold entirely to the publisher and the publisher registers the copyright in the company name.

While Orwell's works are public domain in most countries that MobileReference sells in, they still fall under copyright in the US.

Under the Copyright Act, the first sale doctrine allows the owner of a particular copy of a work to sell, lease or rent that copy to anyone they want at any price they choose.

You will not remove, alter or conceal any copyright, trademark, service mark or other proprietary rights notices incorporated in or accompanying the Blue Buffalo Content and you will not reproduce, modify, adapt, prepare derivative works based on, perform, display, publish, distribute, transmit, broadcast, sell, license or otherwise exploit the Blue Buffalo Content or any portion thereof, except as follows:

If, despite our request that you not send us your Unsolicited Ideas, you still submit your Unsolicited Ideas to us or to any of our employees and / or contractors, then, you hereby grant us and our designees a worldwide, non-exclusive, sublicenseable, assignable, royalty - free, perpetual, irrevocable right to use, reproduce, distribute, create derivative works of, publicly perform, publicly display and license, digitally perform, make, have made, sell, offer for sale and import your Unsolicited Ideas, including, without limitation, all copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets, patents, industrial rights and all other intellectual and proprietary rights related thereto, in any media now known or hereafter developed, for any purpose whatsoever, commercial or otherwise, including, without limitation, giving the Unsolicited Ideas to others.

The Copyright Office proposal would have a disproportionately negative, even catastrophic, impact on the ability of painters and illustrators to make a living from selling copies of their work... It is deeply troubling that government should be considering taking away their principal means of making ends meet — their copyrights.

Stamped on verso» © Copyright 1973 By Donald Judd» Stamped on verso «Printed At Styria Studio» Printer Styria Studio Publisher Experiments in Art & Technology The work is from a drawing for Donald Judd's Untitled (DSS 42), 1963, which was sold at Christie's in 2013 for $ 14 million.

On Tuesday, the poet, actor, photographer, and makeup artist James R. Miller filed a lawsuit against the Robert Mapplethorpe Foundation (RMF), claiming copyright to four photographs that have been shown and sold for decades as Mapplethorpe's work.

You agree not to use, display, reproduce, retransmit, modify, distribute, disseminate, sell, publish, create derivative works of, broadcast, circulate, display or in any way exploit any such content (including any copyrighted material, trademarks, or other proprietary information), in whole or in part, whether by e-mail or by any other means, for any purpose other than for your personal, non-commercial use as set forth herein.

In general it's only possible to claim fair use if only small portions of the work are used for non-commercial purposes, and it does not significantly affect the copyright holder's ability to sell the work.

Copyright law: Should commercial Internet websites that sell music downloads allow users to preview the works following the Copyright Board of Canada's 2007 decision regarding royalties for communication to the public of musical works?

Euro - Excellence imported into Canada and sold products that used the copyrighted work (produced with authorization in Europe).

It asserts, among other things, that: (a) the subscribers of Litigator are subject to terms and conditions that accord with the Copyright Act; (b) it did not engage in copyright infringement; (c) its conduct constituted «fair - dealing,» pursuant to s. 29 and s. 29.1 of the Act; (d) it has the consent and / or an implied licence to copy and sell copies of court documents; and (e) has a right supported by s. 2 (b)(freedom of expression) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, to copy and sell tCopyright Act; (b) it did not engage in copyright infringement; (c) its conduct constituted «fair - dealing,» pursuant to s. 29 and s. 29.1 of the Act; (d) it has the consent and / or an implied licence to copy and sell copies of court documents; and (e) has a right supported by s. 2 (b)(freedom of expression) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, to copy and sell tcopyright infringement; (c) its conduct constituted «fair - dealing,» pursuant to s. 29 and s. 29.1 of the Act; (d) it has the consent and / or an implied licence to copy and sell copies of court documents; and (e) has a right supported by s. 2 (b)(freedom of expression) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, to copy and sell the works.

He further argued that «It is also important to note that selling a copyright holder a counterfeit copy of their own work does not infringe on their copyrights.»

Nintendo alleged that Go Cyber infringed its copyright in the header data contrary to s. 27 (2) of the act in that (i) unauthorized copies of the works are either contained in the game copiers when they were sold by Go Cyber or are obtained by following Go Cyber's instructions; (ii) Go Cyber knew (or was willfully blind to the fact) that the game copiers contained such works; and (iii) Go Cyber sold, distributed and possessed the game copiers for the purpose of those activities.

Justice Douglas Campbell found that the game copiers sold by Go Cyber included the header data and that Go Cyber was aware of and had authorized the copying of Nintendo's copyrighted works without Nintendo's consent.

The header data consisted of three works in which Nintendo had registered copyright and each of the genuine game cards sold by the company contained two of the header data works.

I know that a person needs license to copy, reproduce, redistribute, sell, and create derivative works of copyrighted material.

Access Copyright doesn't sell or distribute your works.

The original copyrighted work is descriptive, not being sold, and its intended audience is coders trying to understand the API.

There is a notion in copyright law called the first - sale doctrine in which after a particular copy of a copyrighted work is legitimately sold, the purchaser can sell, lend, lease, give away, or otherwise dispose of the copy as he sees fit.

Certainly, if I created a work of artistic merit that I could copyright I would be entitled to charge for the product each time I «sold» it.)

Copy, sell, distribute, display, perform, or create derivative works from any content, portion or feature of the CNS Sites in a manner that would violate the copyright or other intellectual property or proprietary rights of the owners of the Content and / or the User Content.

He wanted the copyright of my beautiful design to «sell» to use for other agents he worked with, so he could promote «his work.»

Let me share an example, not on Ross's behalf, but just one example that is easy to understand... here is a link to a promo that cost over 6k, just for the print material for one property (front and back page got repeated as a just listed, just sold postcard) the copyright design as noted is mine, not the graphic artist's, as is the text; make sure you always include that in your contract as «work for hire.»