Sentences with phrase «sell paid versions»

Not exact matches

«When we're watching advertisements, if we're paying attention at all, we're trying to see some better version of ourselves in what's being sold,» says Philp.

Customers pay $ 10 a month for a shipment of four or five samples, and the company then hopes to sell them full - price versions of the items they discovered and liked.

It's the first so - called «pay for delay» case brought by the commission in which a drug's original maker agreed not to sell its own «authorized generic» version until well after a generic drugmaker began selling its product.

The RSV in its myriad editions sells and sells, and the King James Version is with us always in a significant sales - producing role — paying the rent for many a shop, large and small alike.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

I just thought it was worth pointing out that the more logical explanation than the ultimate version of an already brilliant car being shite is that 85 % of owners most likely either purchased the GT4 with the intention of selling it on for a significant profit having briefly sampled it for themselves (lets face it it was a foregone conclusion the GT4 would instantly shoot up in value) OR 85 % of owners were intelligent enough to spot that zero supply and huge demand could produce a significant profit for them having just paid less than # 70,000 for it.

Now, all my print - only books are ebooks on pirate sites, even though Amazon told me that it never sold any of the illegally created «ebook» versions of my work (except to me) if Amazon lied to me, and if Amazon allows people who illegally bought illegal copies of my works which were created in violation of my copyrights (and for which I was never paid any royalties) do you think those re-sales will be legal?

Are you selling unlocked versions of that individual - identified data to your paying clients?

However, Amazon does sell a few 4G versions of their tablet so you can pay for constant Internet access where available.

They — and I say they because I'm assuming the pricing strategy of this book had to be a group effort — have simultaneously launched a book that has absolutely no discount when purchased from Amazon.com (Amazon retail price: $ 26.99, although, some Amazon «merchants» are offering discounts off of retail), however, as I write this, the un-discounted, paid version of the book is the # 1 selling business book on Amazon.

My expenses for a new book are about $ 1100... that includes my cover artist, my copy editor, my own ISBN #, and paying to have my ebook versions professionally made for me... Since I'm still unknown, most of my copies I personally sell at events I attend, but I'm hoping that changes as I come out with more books...

Sadly, like many other commodities, I think we may end up with a tiered market, where the higher end businesses sell better product at higher prices, but fewer products, and then we'll have the dollar store version of books, where you get what you pay for, which for the most part is junk, but you know, people buy it anyway.

How a DUP - linked company is selling its version of Northern Irish peace to the brutal rulers of Bahrain — and the British taxpayer is paying for it

If you buy mutual funds through a broker who charges an asset - based fee, he should sell you the low - MER «F - class» versions which don't pay trailer fees.

I've seen quite a lot of advisors selling this version, which includes a fund from Stone or IA Clarington that I think are crappy funds being sold only because they pay a stupidly high distribution that they can't possibly maintain.

The only thing we got was Rigs (a rocket league clone with no story mode), and they are banking on the VR mode of resident evil7 to sell some device (That's the only reason I purchased my PSVR and already paid the game instead of the 45 $ version on Steam).

It was my understanding that the newest patch was going to give ps3 players one map and weapon before the DLC would be available but we got nothing so is this another one of those say one thing but do something else deals its not fair that the pc version gets a free map plus the maps that the ps3 has and those with a ps3 version have to pay for it WTF why do people have to lie to sell something ps3 users had to wait eight months just to get masks and the scopes were taken away and then we had to wait over three months for this patch and the pc version got tons of add - ons in that time so why is it that sony is so money hungry that they cant give players something for free and im not talking about PS + members either all i can say about all f this is MAJOR FAIL on PSN and OVERKILLSOFTWARE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

For me I beat the game which took a long time, but I never got around to unlocking all of the extra levels or really getting all of the content the game offered on the Wii U. I sold my Wii U copy to pay for part and my Best Buy GCU with the Wii U sell of my physical copy means I only will be paying $ 30 for the Switch version on Friday.

In May, Pablo Picasso's «Les Femmes d'Alger (Version «O»)» sold for $ 179.4 million, breaking the record for the highest price ever paid for a piece of artwork at auction.

At the same time, he pays the bills by selling bound versions through an online print - on - demand service and at bookstores.