You still have those in the pie and can
sell them at any point as well.
Not exact matches
Apple has always touted Apple Pay
as one of the big
selling points of Apple Watch, unfortunately for Canadians it's a feature that will be absent
at launch.
His niche is what he calls the pre-luxury market — the sweet spot between $ 300 and $ 600 — sharing shelf space with brands like Stuart Weitzman and Aquatalia, and once dominated by names such
as Cole Haan and Donald J. Pliner, before they were
sold and repositioned
at a lower price
point.
Jim Pishue, president of the Washington Bankers Association,
points out that guidelines don't supersede federal law, which categorizes marijuana
as a controlled substance that can not be legally
sold anywhere in the U.S. And guidance, he noted, can change
at any time.
Having a place to go when you experience computer problems is another big
selling point for the Mac, and one I appreciate even
as someone who prefers to troubleshoot problems myself if
at all possible.
Debi Mishra, partner director of engineering and machine learning
at Microsoft Corporation,
pointed to the example of GE's aircraft engine business, which shifted its business model from
selling machinery to
selling engines
as a service.
As Lal, Alvarez, and Greenberg
point out in Retail Revolution, PetSmart faced a challenge when pet food suppliers began
selling their products on various e-commerce sites, not to mention
at Walmart, supermarkets, and other non-pet-specific places.
At what
point is jumping on the women's empowerment trend to
sell more product
as empty
as «pinking and shrinking» once was?
And part of the problem is that there's no «real» or «natural» price for CEO labour (or for anything else), nothing to serve
as a comparison
point to figure out if such labour is being
sold at the «right» price.
Cook's appearance
at an enterprise software conference was intended to drive home the
point that Apple wants to be taken seriously
as a company that can
sell to businesses.
«
As such, stressed out sales reps will all too often try to
sell and negotiate
at the same time by layering questions with value
points, or worse, answering their own question on behalf of the prospect.»
At one time its mapping gadgets got nearly every one from
point A to
point B, but the more people started using free apps such
as Google Maps on their smartphones the less of these products it
sold.
Your equity would be defined in each cashflowed home, cash flow of repairs outside of owned properties,
as well
as equity upon
sell of some, or liquidation of all homes
at any
point as deemed most profitable timing
as the market improves.
Since you're probably going to want to
sell these shares
at some
point, you might
as well go ahead and factor it into your costs.
The Triffin Dilemma,
as this problem is known,
points out that if foreign growth is high enough relative to US growth that the need for US dollar reserves grows faster than the US economy, the resulting US current account deficit will require that the US
sell assets fast enough, or that US obligations to foreigners grow fast enough, eventually to put the US economy
at risk.
As with most of our individual stock swing trades, we will be looking for a gain of 15 % to 20 % above our entry
point,
at which
point we would be looking to take profits and
sell into strength.
Selling, general and administrative expenses were 74 basis
points lower than last year
as a percentage of sales due to sales leveraging, lower incentive compensation and a reduction in media spend
at Olive Garden.
The Peso is the strongest currency
at present
as we are still trading above the 20 and 100 - day moving average
as the U.S. dollar is up 45
points as the European currencies are
selling off.
Bonds seem
as yet unable to see what the fuss is all about, but
at this
point it is important to ask ourselves whether the equity market
sell - off is going to bleed into the fixed income world anytime soon.
So
at this stage we know we need to connect
as many high
points as we can when drawing a
sell line.
That's — we didn't
sell much in last year because we had way too much Session and were — we expect that to be well in EMEA, in particular, where we see —
as Nick had mentioned in his remarks, we see more competition
at the lower end of the price
point range versus the upper end.
Likewise, there are just
as many reasons why they consider
selling their online businesses
at some
point.
You decide to purchase the flat
as an investment and pay
as long
as you can,
at which
point you will either break even
selling it back to the developer, or hopefully turn a profit
selling it to someone else
at a higher price.
If you buy it
at a particular
point and you then
sell it, you will be faced with a capital appreciation and then we will treat it
as Capital Gains Tax.»
Even
at that
point I have never
sold everything and have been better off for that,
as the market does come back (even after 2008).
KAI is using its Lockheed connection
as a
selling point to Israel, especially in view of the company's concern that someone
at the Ministry of Defense is evading them and holding secret talks with Alenia Aermacchi, ostensibly following orders to do so.
At a certain
point, the market (such
as in its current condition) becomes «flipped» where an intelligent affiliate / web owner would instead focus on link
selling to webmasters focused on competitive research, instead of trying to recreate a website in the same system and trying to rank with significantly more risk.
Interesting data
points: Absentee buyers, typically investors who don't intend on living in the home
as a primary residence, made up 22.3 percent of all homes
sold in March, up from 20.9 percent
at the same time last year.
Along with other television manufacturers
at this year's Consumer Electronics Show, Samsung is also touting Internet connectivity
as a
selling point for its televisions...
That's one of the things I was
pointing out to someone who read a book on necromancy (long island medium) and was totally
sold on everything the author wrote and was now
at «peace» from reading about the endless cycles of death — i.e. soul coming back
as such... dying then coming back again
as another.
And the sly salesman says
pointing at the neighbors empty arms «Sure sure, but you are holding in your hands the same type of clothing
as I am, though not the quality... Are you not trying to
sell such phony finery?»
3 — I know this may sound diabolical: The repurposed food product, often rendered worthless by all the successive tempering steps taken with it, is
at this
point marketed and
sold as a fantastic food that we worked very hard to make more nutritious and more beneficial than the one we started with.
This Copenhagen branch is also a deli
selling various vegan foods such
as plant milk, cream, yoghurt, chocolate, houmous and much more mostly
at a very fair price
point.
Last week a week's supply
sold out in two days
at a Whole Foods in North California, and
as Grist.org
points out: «Maybe you don't think you WANT a better fake meat, but you probably thought you didn't want a social network that let you transmit 140 - character bon mots, either.»
As for my second
point, coffee
sold at the price
point Yuban and other supermarket coffees
sell for is just unsustainable, period.
I also think the finger should
at least
as much be
pointed to the Europeans who agree to make those labels and
sell those wines.
«Consumers are open to plant - based alternative proteins, and while they recognize health concerns
as a distinct
selling point for these, they will not waver when it comes to taste,» said William Roberts, senior food and drink analyst
at Mintel.
Retailing
at a suggested $ 9.99 - $ 12.99 per can and currently
sold at licensed liquor, convenience, and grocery stores,
as well
as restaurants, bars and clubs everywhere − Peppermint CREAM is also available to wholesalers, distributors and retailers in uniquely designed 12 can
point - of - sale cases.
At this
point with our early injury concerns, Nastasic isn't looking to bad and even though I haven't seen Carvalho play besides the World Cup I would have swapped him for Arteta and or Flamini in a heartbeat, also since we barely play Podolski anyways we should have strengthen the LW
as well by
selling him and going all out for Di Maria (didn't take long for him to adapt did it?)
But
as you have correctly
pointed out though is that we only really spent the budget on 2 additional players really (even thought i believe that they would have been covered by c / l monies and other finances from building projects we make money and monies owed from debts owed to us from barca and others for players
sold in years gone buy on thus not really touching the puma and emirates money
at all # 70 million +).
They have a shelf life of 8/10 years
at the very top if they are lucky so who can begrudge them the opportunity to make hay whilst the sun is shining... am not saying Sanchez is not money driven but the way the guy plays i can mortgage my life he actually enjoys the game, enjoys wining first and foremost then money comes 2nd... like the author of the article rightly
pointed out, he was in Messi's shadow
at Barca and could not express himself fully, now he is
at a club where he is the main man and given a free role and license to express himself and i very much doubt if he will want to go to a club like Madrid (
as been rumoured in the dailies today) to relieve the bad experience he suffered
at Barca because let us face facts, he is never going to displace CR7
as the main man, so even if Madrid
sells Benzema or Bale to make room for him he will be back to the same position he was
at Barca, this time he will be playing 2nd fiddle to CR7 so my guess is all the Madrid talks is been fed the press by his agents to drive a hard bargain when contract extension talks resumes.....
I'm
at the
point now with a CDM that I don't care who it is just
as long
as flamini is
sold and replaced even ki from Swansea would do
as back up
at least he can pass to his teammates and would be happy with a back up role to le coq!
Then
at some
point when you've made it
as uncomfortable
as possible for him and late in the window
sell to whoever for
as much
as we can.
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look
at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system...
at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects,
as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox
as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise...
as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some
points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch...
as for Coq, he is way too reckless
at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part
as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential
as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense
as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and,
at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just
sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
just reading around and all if not most rags are saying our net spend is # 46 million how can they tell that when they do nt even know what our real budget is if it was # 100 million then we are in profit by quite a bit i do nt really know what they base there assumptions on this is where you could do with swiss ramble to dissect what really was spent from what i could see most of our 5 transfers were covered by out goings and c / l monies earned debuchy - vela deal, chambers - vermalen deal, ospina - cesc and miquel deals sanchez c / l monies and other monies recovered from wages and old installment based deals this is the same with welbeck i would imagine if not then poldolski will be
sold in jan to cover this
as i think he was going to be
sold and this would have covered welbecks transfer more or less also and people do nt always realize that arsenal have money coming in from more than one source to cover transfers not just puma and emirates deals we have property arm of the club which makes money for transfers also outstanding debts we are owed of old transfers we receive each year on song cesc maybe van persie and all other structured deals in installment payments sales we just flogged miquel
as an example and all the monies from released wages and youths
sold its a bit to complex to just say we have a net spend of xyz when arsenal do nt even make the budget public so they have no starting
point from which to go from i bet you we have broke even or even made a slight profit
as we are self sustaining it would make sense that we can break even or
at least make the net spend under # 10 million each year
at least screw then all we are the arsenal we do thing our way
We should all know that Kroenke is the biggest problem
as he has no ambition to win any trophies but the chances of him
selling to usmanov or anyone else are 0
at this
point so the next change thats needed is to get rid of wenger but since the kroenke only cares about profit and wenger is perfect for idiot for that, then i guess our only two options are to keep supporting the team or stop attending games or watching them to avoid the same agony
as we have been for the past 10 years or more.
At what
point can we call that a pattern and not blow if off
as just trying to get views /
selling etc..
And we'll have to start
selling players
at a
point as well because we've been spending a lot recently actually.
I've had enough of this crap, look I honesty do think giroud is a good striker and he is a fairly consistant goal scorer, and every time he played for arsenal he gave 100 percent and I think we all appreciated the way he was, a true professional, but to say we
as fans were too critical of him or that he didn't have enough of a chance
at arsenal is just absolute bullshit, first of all he has scored more headed goals than any other player in the prem since he arrived in 2012 so we did play to his strengths and he was our main striker for four long years and every pundit on sky and motd has
at one
point said Giroud is not enough for arsenal to win the title ect, but, now we have
sold him he is apparently the best thing since sliced bread and the best buy of the transfer window blah blah fuc * # * g blah.
Northwestern
at Michigan: Bettors still aren't
sold on Michigan,
as they're getting just 23 % of early spread bets
as 8 -
point favorites.