I love helping distressed
sellers out of their problems and hooking buyers up with good deals.
Not exact matches
I'd also take anything I see with a fairly large pinch
of salt, as «minor»
problems often turn
out to the symptoms
of major ones the
seller doesn't want to mention.
It's a big
seller, easily available and there's a huge community
of T100 users
out there that can help if there are
problems.
You hand over your keys to the buyers and the agent on the other end tells you there's a slight
problem — the
sellers can't move
out just yet because the home they're buying isn't finished and needs a couple
of more weeks.
In Eichenwald's terrific book on Enron, the first person credited with noticing the
problems was a short
seller, who really came
out of left field.
One
of the
problems has been to figure
out a way to get both buyers and
sellers into the ODR system, whatever it is (and there might be many such... [more]
I've never had a
problem and it is a good way to show
sellers that honesty is very important when selling, disclosure usually keeps everyone
out of court.
This seems to be a case wherein a Judge relied upon other Judges» decisions in previous cases that somewhat mirrored the subject case details to explain away his decision, instead
of sticking his neck
out and incorporating good old common sense (from where good old English Common Law evolved from in the first place) to place the majority
of blame where it 100 % rightly belongs, on the heads
of the parties who created the
problem in the first place... the
sellers.
The SPIS is a catch 22, If you don't fill one
out your neglagent and now if you do get one filled
out your liable, The items on an SPIS are items agents need to discuss and disclose in every real estate deal, so without the form as a guideline we will always have areas that get overlooked or at least areas that we will be accused
of not doing enough research, an SPIS on it's own is not enough if the
Seller is hidding something, but the oppourtunity to do a home inspection was included and revealed a
problem, getting rid
of the SPIS will not change the
Seller hidding
problems and then making their agent the escape goat, as always good agents will need to «protect thy @ss» RECO did nothing to acknowledge the condition for the home inspection should have been enough to allow the Buyers to verify the SPIS, this story has facts not being told otherwise the agent would not have pleaded guilty to these claims.
He feels this clause can solve the
problem of sellers not releasing the deposit to the buyer who wants
out of the transaction.
If the
seller is
out of state it is no
problem to close a deal over the phone provided you can get access to the property to do your due diligence somehow.
With the web, where
sellers go to Google and are seeking
out solutions to their
problems... the traffic and trust is skewed to the websites that are in the top 5 results
of a Google search and some
of the ads.
Attempting to clean up the business antics
of problem members this way penalizes
sellers, leaving them to wonder who visited their home while they were
out.
If you are a REALTOR ®, and believe you have an issue with another REALTOR ® involving a commission (arbitration); if you are a REALTOR ® or a resident
of Mercer County and believe you have an issue with a REALTOR ® (ethics complaint); or if you are a Buyer or
Seller and a dispute arises
out of a real estate transaction in which you are involved and you are looking to solve the
problem without litigation (Dispute Resolution System), you can contact Lisa Aaron at the Pennsylvania Association
of Realtors ® to assist you.
In general, the onus is on the buyer to determine the state and quality
of the property being sold — rather than on the
seller to point
out any potential
problems.
However, Utah real estate agents generally have
sellers fill
out a property disclosure that helps prevent liability by making buyers aware
of any
problems prior to closing on the property..