Not exact matches
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially
from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future
pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting
from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or
from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations
from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover
from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase
price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or
at all; 18) competition
from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to
higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue
selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
The company (and its bankers) would then move down
from the top bid until it reached the
highest price at which it could
sell all the shares it wanted to offer.
«Growth in the near - term will come
from higher iPhone X
pricing, a lower - cost iPhone SE update,
selling more services like Pay to its premium subscribers, and increasing output of its surprisingly popular Watch portfolio,» said Neil Mawston, an analyst
at Strategy Analytics.
In Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 98 the Supreme Court formalized this premise into a doctrinal test.The case involved cigarette manufacturing, an industry dominated by six firms.99 Liggett, one of the six, introduced a line of generic cigarettes, which it
sold for about 30 % less than the
price of branded cigarettes.100 Liggett alleged that when it became clear that its generics were diverting business
from branded cigarettes, Brown & Williamson, a competing manufacturer, began
selling its own generics
at a loss.101 Liggett sued, claiming that Brown & Williamson's tactic was designed to pressure Liggett to raise
prices on its generics, thus enabling Brown & Williamson to maintain
high profits on branded cigarettes.
Imported goods will consequently
sell at a relatively
higher price than the same goods available
from local sources.
The example of crude oil alone shows how the U.S. makes money by buying a product
from its NAFTA partners, processing it, and
selling the finished product
at a
higher price.
Contango, a market situation in which the spot
prices are lower than future
prices, encourages traders to store crude oil and profit
from selling it
at prices higher than the spot market.
Unlike mutual funds, ETF shares are bought and
sold at market
price, which may be
higher or lower than their NAV, and are not individually redeemed
from the fund.
Moreover, you can also gain profit
from downward movements in the BCC
price by
selling them
at a
high price and again purchasing them
at a cheap
price.
Incidentally, while poking around
at market oil
prices, I noticed that while Western Canadian Select (WCS), which is dilbit, does
sell at a substantial discount
from WTI, upgraded dilbit is
selling for a much
higher price.
Takeaways include features of the Berkshire System
from the shareholders» viewpoint: (1) Berkshire is unusually congenial to taxable shareholders, enhancing compounding rates considerably; (2) Berkshire's internal cultural features such as autonomy, decentralization, and permanence help attract sellers of
high - quality companies to
sell to Berkshire
at reasonable
prices with managers who stay on and become substantial shareholders; and (3) There is a close symbiotic connection between features (1) and (2) that reinforces Berkshire's
high compounding rate and long time horizon.
If a stock is rising, you can set a
sell limit order
at a
higher price and lock in gains to ensure that you can benefit
from the market's bullish movements.
If you have identical items — say avocados... or Bitcoin — and it fetches a
higher price in one place than another; people will simply buy and
sell these assets
at the same time, to profit
from the difference.
1) Ten years without a significant trophy yet the Manager is never questioned 2)
Selling off key «World beater» Players season after season and replacing them with mediocre
at best replacements 3) Keeping a 33 % shareholder who is one of the world's richest men AND a true football fan as far away
from the board as possible 4) Charging possibly the
highest prices in Europe but NOT reinvesting within the team in any really significant way 5) Classing 4th place in the EPL as a trophy 6) Boasting of a # 100 million war chest for transfers then quibbling over a few hundred thousand on deals.
It is even
higher than the
price of gas
sold to Ghana
from Nigeria, which stands
at $ 8.3 / MMBtu, delivered
at Takoradi.
Current figures
from the petroleum industry show that,
prices of the two products
at the various fuel stations have hit all time
high, with petrol
selling at an average of GHc4.29
at the pumps, and diesel going for an average of GHc4.23 per litre,...
«ICT Direct purchases
high quality business computer equipment
from manufacturers such as HP, Dell and Lenovo, refurbish it to a very
high standard and
sell it onto schools
at a fraction of its original
price.
Given the large number of units
sold — more than 15 million to date, according to Apple — the market leader
from California is the only tablet maker able to obtain
high end materials
at low
prices from component suppliers, thanks to its
high volume of sales.
After a push
from traditional publishers to allow them to set
higher prices (more like a hard shove), Amazon has started
selling e-books
at prices set by the publishers.
I would bet that if you
priced one book
at 99 cents, and then had a lead in
from that book to the second book (with a sales page), you could
sell the second book
at a
higher price — possibly even
higher than $ 4.99.
If Amazon is going to spec it with leading technology components, but charge for less money than competitors (which are using similar parts and
selling for
higher prices at weak margins), then it follows that they're planning on losing money on the tablet and making the money instead on the products and services the owner will subsequently buy
from Amazon.
I appreciate that Amazon is working to try to stop people
from gaming the system, I just wish they stop people
from gaming the exclusive list
at the 99 cent
price point, because that hurts the people
selling real books
at higher price points.
Often people don't actually have your work, even when they
sell your book on ebay, they are just taking the details
from amazon and making a product listing
at a
higher price, so IF it
sells, they'll buy your book and order a copy... so it's actually free marketing for you.
Agency publishers are now giving up 30 % of the revenue
from their
higher -
price ebooks, and they are
selling fewer numbers
at those
prices.
Best idea for the big 2 is to
sell through iTunes and other proprietary apps
at a
higher price point and
sell from their own sites
at a.99
price point.
For example, in the recent resources boom, we heard
from an acquaintance in the mining industry that mining truck tires were so scarce as to
sell in many instances
at a
higher price second hand than new.
If market participants anticipate an increase in the
price of an underlying asset in the future, they could potentially gain by purchasing the asset in a futures contract and
selling it later
at a
higher price on the spot market or profiting
from the favorable
price difference through cash settlement.
Whereas, in a downtrend, «value» is seen
at resistance, since the
price has rotated
higher within the broader downtrend; so it's a good «value» to
sell from resistance in a downtrend.
At maturity date, if the strike price is higher than the market price, am I supposed to buy the underlying from the market immediately before it is sold at the striking price, in order to get profi
At maturity date, if the strike
price is
higher than the market
price, am I supposed to buy the underlying
from the market immediately before it is
sold at the striking price, in order to get profi
at the striking
price, in order to get profit?
Mr. Groovy thought he was buying something
at a bargain
price after
selling it
higher, and found out later (without receiving a notification that might have prevented him
from buying again
at that moment) the market
price on the day of the re-purchase was not honored.
A mutual fund that focuses on stocks
from companies that are typically found in low - growth or mature industries, often produce
higher and more regular dividend income, and
sell at discounted
prices.
On the S&P 500 chart, such timing maneuvers — while ultimately counterproductive
from a pure profit standpoint (because the investor is buying in
at about a 12 %
higher price than where he or she
sold)-- could almost be understood, given they would have spared an investor the emotional pain of the bear market.
Investors might also pay markups, due when a brokerage
sells securities
from its inventory
at a
price higher than the market rate; sales loads, sometimes assessed when you make or
sell an investment; surrender charges, imposed when someone pulls out of an investment early; investment advisory fees, which are what Mr. Five Percent wanted to charge me; and 401 (k) fees, additional expenses for operating and administering retirement plans that employees pay on top of fund management fees.
The above practice of buying
from one market and
selling at a slightly
higher price in a different market is called as «Arbitrage Opportunity».
ETFs tracks the index very closely, but a wide bid - ask spread or deviations
from fair value might make ordering «
at market value» a bit risky — you could end up buying /
selling your shares
at a much
higher / lower
price than you expect.
Number two is the hidden bidding up of the shares through sham transactions where related parties buy &
sell at progressively
higher prices (netting to no loss, aside
from commissions) until some speculators see the microcap stock and start driving it
higher, possibly supported by promotional paid research.
Stock were
selling at insanely
high prices all the way
from 1996 through 2008.
Now come the expiration date if my AMD shares are
at or over the strike
price of $ 8, then my stock will be called away
from me and I will have to
sell at $ 8 per share — even if the
price at that time is
higher.
The average
price for townhouses
sold in the area reached a new
high at $ 966,221 in March, up 16.3 per cent
from a year earlier, the Real Estate Board of Greater Vancouver said on Wednesday.
Unlike mutual funds, ETF shares are bought and
sold at market
price, which may be
higher or lower than their NAV, and are not individually redeemed
from the fund.
Instead, I opted to aim for more guaranteed income
from the premiums and not potentially more income
from selling at a
higher exit
price.
However people are not adopting
from the shelters, they are getting dogs
at much cheaper
prices placing them in foster until homes can be found, then re
selling these dogs
at much
higher prices at the same time collecting a huge amount of charity.
The truffles are harvested
from December to February and
sold in markets
at very
high prices.
Christie's Evening Sale of Post-War and Contemporary Art in New York Totals $ 388.5 Million (# 240.9 Million / $ 299.1 Million) Most Valuable Post-War and Contemporary Art Auction Ever Top
Prices Of The Week - Mark Rothko's Orange, Red, Yellow Soars to $ 86.9 Million (# 53.9 Million / $ 66.9 Million) Setting a New Record for Any Post-War and Contemporary Work
Sold at Auction 21 New World Auction Records Set 50 Works
Sell Above $ 1 Million Works
from the Pincus Collection (Evening and Day Sales) Totaled $ 174.9 Million, the Most Expensive Collection of Post-War and Contemporary Art Ever
Sold Christie's highly anticipated Post-War and Contemporary Art Evening Sale on May 8 totaled $ 388.5 million (# 240.9 million / $ 299.1 million), marking the
highest total ever in auction history for the category.
The
highest priced lot will be Gerhard Richter's Abstraktes Bild
from 1989 (Lot 202) that is estimated
at $ 2,000,000 — $ 3,000,000, Jeff Koons» Moustache
from 2003 (Lot 150) should be
sold for $ 1,800,000 — $ 2,500,000, while Andy Warhol's Camouflage
from 1987 (Lot 152) and another Richter's work, Abstraktes Bild
from 1986 (Lot 200) are both estimated
at $ 1,500,000 — $ 2,000,000.
The reception of the movement has been complicated by the fact that many of the artists have become part of the canon and as a result their paintings
sell at very
high prices, which sort of distracts
from the work itself.
[11] In 1988, Johns» False Start was
sold at auction
at Sotheby's to Samuel I. Newhouse, Jr. for $ 17.05 million, setting a record
at the time as the
highest price paid for a work by a living artist
at auction, and the second
highest price paid for an artwork
at auction in the U.S. [32] In 2006, private collectors Anne and Kenneth Griffin (founder of the Chicago - based hedge fund Citadel LLC) bought False Start (1959)
from David Geffen [33] for $ 80 million, making it the most expensive painting by a living artist.
His gallery had
sold works
at a range of
prices:
from $ 4,000 for each of two sets of three gold - plated brass leaves by Laura Vinci Folhas Avulsas # 1 and Folhas Avulsas # 2, both made in 2018 and part of an edition of five plus two artist proofs, up to $ 125,000 for a mirrored work by Daniel Buren, Prisms and Mirrors,
high reliefs, situated works (2016 - 2017), which
sold «within minutes.»
His heavily featured Study for Portrait of P.L. failed to
sell the night before
at Sotheby's, perhaps suffering
from its
high price tag.
An untitled Jean - Michel Basquiat skull painting
from 1982
sold for USD$ 110.5 m with fees to the Japanese billionaire Yusaku Maezawa, marking the
highest price at auction for a post-1980 artwork, the second -
highest price for any contemporary work
at auction and the sixth -
highest price for any work
sold at auction, in a sale
at Sotheby's.