Sentences with phrase «selling at high prices from»

Not exact matches

Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
The company (and its bankers) would then move down from the top bid until it reached the highest price at which it could sell all the shares it wanted to offer.
«Growth in the near - term will come from higher iPhone X pricing, a lower - cost iPhone SE update, selling more services like Pay to its premium subscribers, and increasing output of its surprisingly popular Watch portfolio,» said Neil Mawston, an analyst at Strategy Analytics.
In Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 98 the Supreme Court formalized this premise into a doctrinal test.The case involved cigarette manufacturing, an industry dominated by six firms.99 Liggett, one of the six, introduced a line of generic cigarettes, which it sold for about 30 % less than the price of branded cigarettes.100 Liggett alleged that when it became clear that its generics were diverting business from branded cigarettes, Brown & Williamson, a competing manufacturer, began selling its own generics at a loss.101 Liggett sued, claiming that Brown & Williamson's tactic was designed to pressure Liggett to raise prices on its generics, thus enabling Brown & Williamson to maintain high profits on branded cigarettes.
Imported goods will consequently sell at a relatively higher price than the same goods available from local sources.
The example of crude oil alone shows how the U.S. makes money by buying a product from its NAFTA partners, processing it, and selling the finished product at a higher price.
Contango, a market situation in which the spot prices are lower than future prices, encourages traders to store crude oil and profit from selling it at prices higher than the spot market.
Unlike mutual funds, ETF shares are bought and sold at market price, which may be higher or lower than their NAV, and are not individually redeemed from the fund.
Moreover, you can also gain profit from downward movements in the BCC price by selling them at a high price and again purchasing them at a cheap price.
Incidentally, while poking around at market oil prices, I noticed that while Western Canadian Select (WCS), which is dilbit, does sell at a substantial discount from WTI, upgraded dilbit is selling for a much higher price.
Takeaways include features of the Berkshire System from the shareholders» viewpoint: (1) Berkshire is unusually congenial to taxable shareholders, enhancing compounding rates considerably; (2) Berkshire's internal cultural features such as autonomy, decentralization, and permanence help attract sellers of high - quality companies to sell to Berkshire at reasonable prices with managers who stay on and become substantial shareholders; and (3) There is a close symbiotic connection between features (1) and (2) that reinforces Berkshire's high compounding rate and long time horizon.
If a stock is rising, you can set a sell limit order at a higher price and lock in gains to ensure that you can benefit from the market's bullish movements.
If you have identical items — say avocados... or Bitcoin — and it fetches a higher price in one place than another; people will simply buy and sell these assets at the same time, to profit from the difference.
1) Ten years without a significant trophy yet the Manager is never questioned 2) Selling off key «World beater» Players season after season and replacing them with mediocre at best replacements 3) Keeping a 33 % shareholder who is one of the world's richest men AND a true football fan as far away from the board as possible 4) Charging possibly the highest prices in Europe but NOT reinvesting within the team in any really significant way 5) Classing 4th place in the EPL as a trophy 6) Boasting of a # 100 million war chest for transfers then quibbling over a few hundred thousand on deals.
It is even higher than the price of gas sold to Ghana from Nigeria, which stands at $ 8.3 / MMBtu, delivered at Takoradi.
Current figures from the petroleum industry show that, prices of the two products at the various fuel stations have hit all time high, with petrol selling at an average of GHc4.29 at the pumps, and diesel going for an average of GHc4.23 per litre,...
«ICT Direct purchases high quality business computer equipment from manufacturers such as HP, Dell and Lenovo, refurbish it to a very high standard and sell it onto schools at a fraction of its original price.
Given the large number of units sold — more than 15 million to date, according to Apple — the market leader from California is the only tablet maker able to obtain high end materials at low prices from component suppliers, thanks to its high volume of sales.
After a push from traditional publishers to allow them to set higher prices (more like a hard shove), Amazon has started selling e-books at prices set by the publishers.
I would bet that if you priced one book at 99 cents, and then had a lead in from that book to the second book (with a sales page), you could sell the second book at a higher price — possibly even higher than $ 4.99.
If Amazon is going to spec it with leading technology components, but charge for less money than competitors (which are using similar parts and selling for higher prices at weak margins), then it follows that they're planning on losing money on the tablet and making the money instead on the products and services the owner will subsequently buy from Amazon.
I appreciate that Amazon is working to try to stop people from gaming the system, I just wish they stop people from gaming the exclusive list at the 99 cent price point, because that hurts the people selling real books at higher price points.
Often people don't actually have your work, even when they sell your book on ebay, they are just taking the details from amazon and making a product listing at a higher price, so IF it sells, they'll buy your book and order a copy... so it's actually free marketing for you.
Agency publishers are now giving up 30 % of the revenue from their higher - price ebooks, and they are selling fewer numbers at those prices.
Best idea for the big 2 is to sell through iTunes and other proprietary apps at a higher price point and sell from their own sites at a.99 price point.
For example, in the recent resources boom, we heard from an acquaintance in the mining industry that mining truck tires were so scarce as to sell in many instances at a higher price second hand than new.
If market participants anticipate an increase in the price of an underlying asset in the future, they could potentially gain by purchasing the asset in a futures contract and selling it later at a higher price on the spot market or profiting from the favorable price difference through cash settlement.
Whereas, in a downtrend, «value» is seen at resistance, since the price has rotated higher within the broader downtrend; so it's a good «value» to sell from resistance in a downtrend.
At maturity date, if the strike price is higher than the market price, am I supposed to buy the underlying from the market immediately before it is sold at the striking price, in order to get profiAt maturity date, if the strike price is higher than the market price, am I supposed to buy the underlying from the market immediately before it is sold at the striking price, in order to get profiat the striking price, in order to get profit?
Mr. Groovy thought he was buying something at a bargain price after selling it higher, and found out later (without receiving a notification that might have prevented him from buying again at that moment) the market price on the day of the re-purchase was not honored.
A mutual fund that focuses on stocks from companies that are typically found in low - growth or mature industries, often produce higher and more regular dividend income, and sell at discounted prices.
On the S&P 500 chart, such timing maneuvers — while ultimately counterproductive from a pure profit standpoint (because the investor is buying in at about a 12 % higher price than where he or she sold)-- could almost be understood, given they would have spared an investor the emotional pain of the bear market.
Investors might also pay markups, due when a brokerage sells securities from its inventory at a price higher than the market rate; sales loads, sometimes assessed when you make or sell an investment; surrender charges, imposed when someone pulls out of an investment early; investment advisory fees, which are what Mr. Five Percent wanted to charge me; and 401 (k) fees, additional expenses for operating and administering retirement plans that employees pay on top of fund management fees.
The above practice of buying from one market and selling at a slightly higher price in a different market is called as «Arbitrage Opportunity».
ETFs tracks the index very closely, but a wide bid - ask spread or deviations from fair value might make ordering «at market value» a bit risky — you could end up buying / selling your shares at a much higher / lower price than you expect.
Number two is the hidden bidding up of the shares through sham transactions where related parties buy & sell at progressively higher prices (netting to no loss, aside from commissions) until some speculators see the microcap stock and start driving it higher, possibly supported by promotional paid research.
Stock were selling at insanely high prices all the way from 1996 through 2008.
Now come the expiration date if my AMD shares are at or over the strike price of $ 8, then my stock will be called away from me and I will have to sell at $ 8 per share — even if the price at that time is higher.
The average price for townhouses sold in the area reached a new high at $ 966,221 in March, up 16.3 per cent from a year earlier, the Real Estate Board of Greater Vancouver said on Wednesday.
Unlike mutual funds, ETF shares are bought and sold at market price, which may be higher or lower than their NAV, and are not individually redeemed from the fund.
Instead, I opted to aim for more guaranteed income from the premiums and not potentially more income from selling at a higher exit price.
However people are not adopting from the shelters, they are getting dogs at much cheaper prices placing them in foster until homes can be found, then re selling these dogs at much higher prices at the same time collecting a huge amount of charity.
The truffles are harvested from December to February and sold in markets at very high prices.
Christie's Evening Sale of Post-War and Contemporary Art in New York Totals $ 388.5 Million (# 240.9 Million / $ 299.1 Million) Most Valuable Post-War and Contemporary Art Auction Ever Top Prices Of The Week - Mark Rothko's Orange, Red, Yellow Soars to $ 86.9 Million (# 53.9 Million / $ 66.9 Million) Setting a New Record for Any Post-War and Contemporary Work Sold at Auction 21 New World Auction Records Set 50 Works Sell Above $ 1 Million Works from the Pincus Collection (Evening and Day Sales) Totaled $ 174.9 Million, the Most Expensive Collection of Post-War and Contemporary Art Ever Sold Christie's highly anticipated Post-War and Contemporary Art Evening Sale on May 8 totaled $ 388.5 million (# 240.9 million / $ 299.1 million), marking the highest total ever in auction history for the category.
The highest priced lot will be Gerhard Richter's Abstraktes Bild from 1989 (Lot 202) that is estimated at $ 2,000,000 — $ 3,000,000, Jeff Koons» Moustache from 2003 (Lot 150) should be sold for $ 1,800,000 — $ 2,500,000, while Andy Warhol's Camouflage from 1987 (Lot 152) and another Richter's work, Abstraktes Bild from 1986 (Lot 200) are both estimated at $ 1,500,000 — $ 2,000,000.
The reception of the movement has been complicated by the fact that many of the artists have become part of the canon and as a result their paintings sell at very high prices, which sort of distracts from the work itself.
[11] In 1988, Johns» False Start was sold at auction at Sotheby's to Samuel I. Newhouse, Jr. for $ 17.05 million, setting a record at the time as the highest price paid for a work by a living artist at auction, and the second highest price paid for an artwork at auction in the U.S. [32] In 2006, private collectors Anne and Kenneth Griffin (founder of the Chicago - based hedge fund Citadel LLC) bought False Start (1959) from David Geffen [33] for $ 80 million, making it the most expensive painting by a living artist.
His gallery had sold works at a range of prices: from $ 4,000 for each of two sets of three gold - plated brass leaves by Laura Vinci Folhas Avulsas # 1 and Folhas Avulsas # 2, both made in 2018 and part of an edition of five plus two artist proofs, up to $ 125,000 for a mirrored work by Daniel Buren, Prisms and Mirrors, high reliefs, situated works (2016 - 2017), which sold «within minutes.»
His heavily featured Study for Portrait of P.L. failed to sell the night before at Sotheby's, perhaps suffering from its high price tag.
An untitled Jean - Michel Basquiat skull painting from 1982 sold for USD$ 110.5 m with fees to the Japanese billionaire Yusaku Maezawa, marking the highest price at auction for a post-1980 artwork, the second - highest price for any contemporary work at auction and the sixth - highest price for any work sold at auction, in a sale at Sotheby's.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z