Sentences with phrase «selling at the right price»

Whether you are selling in order to upsize or downsize, a critical decision that can ensure your house sells at the right price within a reasonable period of time is a great real estate agent.

Andre silva (Porto) Porto have to gain arround # 110m in sales of players so they will be willing to sell at the right price.

We are slow to get our targets comparing to Man Utd, Man City is that we are waiting for things to happen (player want to leave, clubs want to sell at right price)-- rather than forcing things to happen — Man City pay over the odd for Sterling, Man Utd offer 275k / week to convince Schweisteinger to leave Bayern, 29M for a DM.

No matter what Brendan Rodgers says, they'll sell at the right price.

The Moroccan international scored five goals in 30 league appearances last season, and while Roma are keen on keeping one of their prize assets ahead of their return to Champions League football, they are willing to sell him at the right price.

The third issue for PSG, once you have established Juve will sell at the right price and Pogba is prepared to leave, is then persuading him to choose the Parc des Princes over the other major European clubs.

Dortmund will sell at right price and United will splash cash for the right man.

OverDrive will need to be willing to sell at the right price, which I won't even attempt to suggest here, not knowing all the variables, which disinterested appraisers could consider.

Well, I can tell you that you better have the greatest eBook in the world selling and being sold at the right price too, or else some naive eBook author will not be making any money, jobless and probably hunting food stamps.

It is not about selling at the right price, although that is certainly important.

After working 30 or 40 years to build your brokerage, you'll want to leverage the equity you have created to sell it at the right price and to the people you want.

If you're located in my Southeast Florida Real Estate market and need to sell your home and want to avoid the pricing games, call me, I'll get your home sold at the right price.

Whether you're a first - time homebuyer scanning the market, a luxury homeowner looking to sell at the right price, or on the hunt for lake - front property, you can get an idea of what's available by searching our listings.

Not exact matches

There is now far more demand for options to sell Brent than there is for call options, which are the right to buy Brent at a certain price.

(If I owned, for example, $ 1,000,000 of «AAA» - rated bonds from a large US company I could very easily sell them at market price right now.

If the oil traders are right, they can make money by buying oil at today's spot price, selling a futures contract for delivery at the higher price expected in the future and storing the oil in the meantime.

Many investors know that a put option gives them the right to sell a stock at a specified price within a set period, while a call option provides the right to purchase shares at a specified price, also within a set period.

And part of the problem is that there's no «real» or «natural» price for CEO labour (or for anything else), nothing to serve as a comparison point to figure out if such labour is being sold at the «right» price.

WELL GUESS WHAT, IF THEY HAD 60 % MORE AT THE RIGHT PRICE THEY»D HAVE SOLD IT TO THEM ALREADY.

If you sell me a September 2011 call option with a strike price of $ 19 on your XIU ETF for a premium of 40 cents, it gives me the right, but not the obligation, to buy your XIU ETF from you at $ 19 at any time before the option expires.

Under certain circumstances, including if the public offering occurs prior to March 24, 2015, or if the right to purchase shares in the public offering conflicts with applicable securities laws, or if some other legal impediment or requirement would prevent or materially delay the consummation of or unreasonably interfere with either such offering or the purchase of the shares by Passport in such offering, then instead of the right to purchase shares in the public offering, Passport would have the right to purchase the same number of shares, at the same purchase price the shares in the public offering are sold to the public, in a separate and concurrent private placement transaction.

Similarly, a put stock option gives its owner the right to sell the stock at the expiration date for a given price.

Given the absence of a public trading market of our common stock, and in accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Accounting and Valuation Guide, Valuation of Privately - Held Company Equity Securities Issued as Compensation, our board of directors exercised reasonable judgment and considered numerous and subjective factors to determine the best estimate of fair value of our common stock, including independent third - party valuations of our common stock; the prices at which we sold shares of our convertible preferred stock to outside investors in arms - length transactions; the rights, preferences, and privileges of our convertible preferred stock relative to those of our common stock; our operating results, financial position, and capital resources; current business conditions and projections; the lack of marketability of our common stock; the hiring of key personnel and the experience of our management; the introduction of new products; our stage of development and material risks related to our business; the fact that the option grants involve illiquid securities in a private company; the likelihood of achieving a liquidity event, such as an initial public offering or a sale of our company given the prevailing market conditions and the nature and history of our business; industry trends and competitive environment; trends in consumer spending, including consumer confidence; and overall economic indicators, including gross domestic product, employment, inflation and interest rates, and the general economic outlook.

With the crash happening so fast, traders were margin called almost instantly, and in some cases saw their entire holdings sold off at very low prices before they could react — selling, say, 100 ETH at $ 2 to cover just a few hundred dollars» loss, right before the market bounced back to almost $ 300 / ETH again.

Based on their analysis, the San Francisco Bay Area is one of the best markets for sellers right now, with homes selling quickly at or near the full asking price.

This entails buying put options, which give the owner the right to sell the stock at a specified price at a fixed future date, while selling call options, which give the acquirer the right to buy the stock at a set price.

An option is a contract giving the owner the right, but not the obligation, to buy (in the case of calls) or sell (in the case of puts) the underlying instrument at a specified price for a specified period of time.

The report stated that management's «willingness to sell is high... at the right price.»

Assuming the Series B is sold at $ 2 per share and the Series A was sold at $ 1 per share, the Series B investor typically would not want to pay $ 2 per share for a Series A stock with price - based rights (i.e. liquidation preference) at $ 1 per share.

An SPY put would give you the right, but not the obligation, to sell the SPY at a predetermined price over a specific time period.

Buyers of put options acquire the right to sell shares of stock at a certain price at any time over a fixed period.

I thought ROFR means when an investor / founder is trying to sell its share to any other third party, the company have the right to purchase from the selling investor / founder the shares it intents to sell at a matching price.

A contract that gives you the right or obligation to buy or sell an underlying security at an agreed - upon price on or before a specific date.

An option is a contract that gives the buyer the right, but not the obligation, to buy or sell a stock or other security at a pre-determined price on or before a certain date.

Hi Nick, For those who don't know what a put is; An option contract giving the owner the right, but not the obligation, to sell a specified amount of an underlying asset at a set price within a specified time.

IF THE COMPANY BELIEVES, IN ITS SOLE DISCRETION, THAT ANY INDIVIDUALS OR ENTITIES OWNING CTK CREATES MATERIAL REGULATORY OR OTHER LEGAL RISKS OR ADVERSE EFFECTS FOR THE COMPANY AND / OR CTK, THE COMPANY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO: (A) BUY ALL CTK FROM SUCH CTK OWNERS AT THE THEN - EXISTING MARKET PRICE AND / OR (B) SELL ALL CRYPTOCURRENCY ASSETS OF THE COMPANY.

The buyer of a put has the right to sell a stock at a set price until the contract expires.

When you sell a covered call, also known as writing a call, you already own shares of the underlying stock and you are selling someone the right, but not the obligation, to buy that stock at a set price until the option expires — and the price won't change no matter which way the market goes.1 If you didn't own the stock, it would be known as a naked call — a much riskier proposition.

These long - term options provide the holder the right to purchase, in the case of a call, or sell in the case of a put, a specified number of stock shares (or an equity index) at a pre-determined price up to the expiration date of the option, which can be three years in the future.

The company is able to have an incredible focus on selling the right products, at the right price to the right markets at the right time.

«So there are people, our sales people, who go into the market every day and sell the product at the best possible price in the right channels... at minimum rebates and discounts.

It is one thing wanting to buy and sell bulk wine, it is another getting your hands on the right volumes at the right price.

What I was saying is that Arsenal could not afford two big name signings considering what had been spent on replacing keeper, RB, CB, and CF.. In addition Arsenal had a right of first refusal meaning that it would not have had influence over the price at which Fab would be sold.

I reiterate once again it will be PENNY WISE BUT POUND FOOLISH not too sell JACK WILSHERE at the RIGHT PRICE

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Our perennial problem is that Arsene is a stubborn, deluded transfer dealer who's always looking for a bloody bargain and will sell anything to anyone at the right price!

Van Dijk is rated amongst the best defenders in the Premier League at present, despite representing a mid-table side, and Southampton are known for selling players for the right price, and will most certainly lose their star centre - halve this summer.

As well as buying talent, Zorc understands that selling at the right time, for the right price, is just as big a part of the process.

Despite scoring yesterday in the 2 - 2 draw with Hull, Ronald Koeman has not been impressed with midfielder Ross Barkley in recent weeks, and while he is still rated at # 30m by others clubs, Everton could be tempted to sell up during the January transfer window if the price is right.

BUT I DO NT REALLY THINK THAT THIS IS THE SOURCE OF THE PBM AT ARSENAL RIGHT NOW.THERE MUST BE SOMETHING ELSE, AND WE AS FANS CANT DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT COZ ITS OCCURING WITHIN THE CLUB ITSELF WHICH WILL NEVER BE EXPOSED TO US, ALL WE CAN DO IS TO WATCH AND TAKE DECISION UPON OUR OWN PERSONNAL INTEREST.THE ONLY ONE AND OBVIOUS PBM WE CAN SEE NOW IS: ARSENAL IS TRYING TO PRODUCE CHEAP YOUNG PLAYERS, TAKING THE RISK OF PUTTING THEM ON THE PL AND CL CHALLENGE SO THAT THEY WILL BE EXPERIENCED AT A VERY YOUNG AGE AND TALENTED AND THEY WILL SOLD AT A VERY HIGH PRICE COS THAT SEEMS TO BE THE FASHION NOWADAYS.BUT IT DID NT WORK!!!!! At the end of the day, whos loosinAT ARSENAL RIGHT NOW.THERE MUST BE SOMETHING ELSE, AND WE AS FANS CANT DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT COZ ITS OCCURING WITHIN THE CLUB ITSELF WHICH WILL NEVER BE EXPOSED TO US, ALL WE CAN DO IS TO WATCH AND TAKE DECISION UPON OUR OWN PERSONNAL INTEREST.THE ONLY ONE AND OBVIOUS PBM WE CAN SEE NOW IS: ARSENAL IS TRYING TO PRODUCE CHEAP YOUNG PLAYERS, TAKING THE RISK OF PUTTING THEM ON THE PL AND CL CHALLENGE SO THAT THEY WILL BE EXPERIENCED AT A VERY YOUNG AGE AND TALENTED AND THEY WILL SOLD AT A VERY HIGH PRICE COS THAT SEEMS TO BE THE FASHION NOWADAYS.BUT IT DID NT WORK!!!!! At the end of the day, whos loosinAT A VERY YOUNG AGE AND TALENTED AND THEY WILL SOLD AT A VERY HIGH PRICE COS THAT SEEMS TO BE THE FASHION NOWADAYS.BUT IT DID NT WORK!!!!! At the end of the day, whos loosinAT A VERY HIGH PRICE COS THAT SEEMS TO BE THE FASHION NOWADAYS.BUT IT DID NT WORK!!!!! At the end of the day, whos loosinAt the end of the day, whos loosing?