Sentences with phrase «selling more electricity»

For the utilities (contrary to broad misconceptions), plug - in cars are not about selling more electricity.

We've got ta have a public energy system — not rely on companies motivated by private profit who make more money when they sell more electricity or fuel.

Not exact matches

when you sell a product that lower's or eliminantes energy bill's (heating, electricity, car and diesel fuel bill's) That is more than stimulus that is FREEDOM.

But when so many turn down leasing one and one - half acre for one Wind Turbine for each 80 acres, that lease certainly does not materially affect the rest of the Farm or Ranch grazing pasture and the lease pays much more than the farm crow or grazing pasture lease, just because some lawyer said the lease was too long: 30 years plus 30 year option = 60 years, and the wind turbine company has selling production / electricity contracts for the next 150 years — which is needed to obtain financing!

** JPMorgan Chase & Co's commodity trading arm is looking to sell more of the electricity deals it has with U.S. power plants and wind farms, a source familiar with the business said on Wednesday, at a time when Wall Street's involvement in physical commodity markets is under heightened scrutiny.

Global Water Engineering has partnered with Chokyuenyong Industrial in Thailand to cut effluent COD pollution levels at its cassava production plant by more than 95 percent while extracting gas from its wastewater to power its boilers and generate electricity for its own use and to sell back to the provincial grid.

The equipment, which could cover more than 20 percent of the county's electricity use, could be turned over or sold to the county at the end of the contract.

According to our analysis, this would generate more than enough electricity to power the biorefinery, so surplus power could be sold back to the grid, displacing electricity produced from fossil fuels — a practice already used in some plants in Brazil to produce ethanol from sugarcane.

The incandescent and fluorescent bulbs commonly sold today use a lot more electricity than do LEDs, but they are also better at shedding heat, says Christian Wetzel, an associate physics professor at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in Troy, N.Y. «LEDs may generate less heat,» he adds, «but it still needs to be removed.»

Meaning a utility could generate electricity for free, and still not be able to sell it because panels on your roof would still be more competitive.

Designing a sufficiently efficient way of storing electricity to make intermittent renewables viable is a much more tractable engineering problem, unless you are in the business of selling coal and don't know how to do anything else.

At the same time, utilities are feeling the squeeze from distributed energy resources like rooftop solar, which further threatens to erode their ability to sell more kilowatt - hours of electricity to their customers and build more power plants.

The divide between utility - scale solar and behind - the - meter (BTM) solar will become more apparent as the zero - sum game for selling electricity intensifies.

According to Pentland, increasing demand is unlikely to be the cause of rising electricity rates, due to the simple fact that «many if not most utilities are selling less — not more — electricity than they used to sell.»

Once you recoup your initial investment through these savings, you will continue to receive free electricity in the form of solar credits until you sell your share or the project is decommissioned — which can be 25 or more years.

This means that as Duke Energy and other providers that are doing the same thing — building generation facilities with high capital costs relative to their probable return using our tax dollars, more or less directly transporting those dollars into their pockets — sell the electricity built with the resources we helped them build, they will charge us more money for all the electricity they sell.

In most states the systems provide your power needs throughout the day and if your system produces more electricity than your home is using, it sends the excess back to the electric grid, selling your extra solar power back to the utility where it can be used by your neighbors and others.

By installing a large PV solar nameplate capacity, using the need to pay off this (subsidized) investment as the rationale for approved rate increases, and then selling us (mostly) the cheaper electricity they make from coal and uranium, they actually increase the profitability of coal and uranium more than PV solar.

The country's enormous hydropower capacity allows for electricity export; Canada sells some 50 billion kilowatt - hours to the United States every year — enough to power more than 4 million American homes.

• Kyoto Protocol • EU ETS • Australian CO2 tax and ETS • Mandating and heavily subsidising ($ / TWh delivered) renewable energy • Masses of inappropriate regulations that have inhibited the development of nuclear power, made it perhaps five times more expensive now than it should be, slowed its development, slowed its roll out, caused global CO2 emissions to be 10 % to 20 % higher now than they would otherwise have been, meaning we are on a much slower trajectory to reduce emissions than we would be and, most importantly, we are locked in to fossil fuel electricity generation that causes 10 to 100 times more fatalities per TWh than would be the case if we allowed nuclear to develop (or perhaps 1000 times according to this: http://nextbigfuture.com/2011/03/deaths-per-twh-by-energy-source.html • Making building regulations that effectively prevent people from selling, refurbishing or updating their houses if they are close to sea level (the damage to property values and to property owners» life savings is enormous as many examples in Australia are already demonstrating.

The whole point of the FIT program, IMHO, was to make electricity production in Ontario more accessible to communities, homeowners, schools, farmers, etc... by creating a standard, long - term contract and process for selling green electricity into the provincial grid.

Electricity is bought and sold in a «free» market, as far as any are in fact totally «free» — the price of electricity is linked to that of gas and oil and coal and carbon, and it is also driven by supply and demand — it gets dearer in the cold weather when we use more (generallyElectricity is bought and sold in a «free» market, as far as any are in fact totally «free» — the price of electricity is linked to that of gas and oil and coal and carbon, and it is also driven by supply and demand — it gets dearer in the cold weather when we use more (generallyelectricity is linked to that of gas and oil and coal and carbon, and it is also driven by supply and demand — it gets dearer in the cold weather when we use more (generally speaking).

At government auctions, wind companies have won more than half of all contracts to sell electricity since 2011, according to Bloomberg data.

Provides opportunities for refineries to comply by blending biofuels, purchasing credits from utilities and others that sell electricity for EVs, reducing emissions associated with refining, and more

This occurs because Ontario produces more clean electricity than it can use, so it is forced to sell off surplus energy at a discounted rate.

With ample storage Diablo Canyon could churn out and store electricity during solar surges and sell it when the PV panels have gone to sleep — and do it more profitably than wind and solar can.

To take just one example, most utilities in the country still get paid more the more electricity they sell.

The accountants wanted to generate and sell as much electricity as they could to make Snowy Hydro look more profitable so the governments could sell it for the best price they could get.

In cases when your turbine is producing more energy than you are using, you sell the excess electricity back to the electric company.

And electricity retailers are also accused of picking up more profits from exports of excess electricity back to the grid from rooftop solar systems — for which they pay 6c / kWh (and in some cases nothing at all) and then sell it to the houses in the same street for up to five times as much.

I can limit flood damage and improve health very simply: But I need lower cost energy (you don't want that), lower cost steel and transportation (you are working very hard to make both more expensive), more proper and safe rules and less excessive regulation (you want more regulation and more fees and more interferences from very propagandized zealots against work), lower costs for electricity, water and fuel (you seek more taxes and rules on all) no government corruption (The carbon taxes you want go ONLY to the corrupt third world dictators and NGO profit - seekers who are selling their ENRON - inspired carbon credits, none do anything for the people of each country forced into squalor and death.)

Other new provisions in Polish law could make it more difficult for renewable energy facilities to sell electricity to the grid, delaying recovery of investment costs and profits.

Under these policies, a producer who generates more renewable electricity than required to meet its own RPS obligation may either trade or sell RECs to other electricity suppliers who may not have enough RPS - eligible renewable electricity to meet their own RPS requirement.

[10] Critics suggested requiring Duke / Progress to generate more renewable energy, to provide more protection for the poor against future rate increases, to commit to investments in energy conservation and smart - grid technologies, to allow solar - panel owners to sell electricity directly to consumers rather than only to utilities, and to unlink electric company profits from the amount of power sold.

Under the Renewable Energy Act, which has been imitated around the world, any renewable power investor — be it a household installing a solar array on the roof, a cooperative erecting a windmill, a farmer running a biogas installation, or an institutional investor operating an offshore wind park — could sell their green electricity at a guaranteed price above wholesale market price, fixed in advance for 20 years (for more details, see the factsheet Defining features of the Renewable Energy Act (EEG)-RRB-.

Starting from the bottom: with regard to Argentina — there is no mention of the military junta in the mid-70s, nor the 30,000 (at the least) torture and killed, nor of the mothers and grandmothers walking for 20 or more years in silence protesting the killings in a Bueno Aires plaza, nor is there is mention of the billions of dollars of US military aircraft and other weapons (as well torturing equipment for sending high to low charges of electricity through various parts of the body (private parts though preferred, as they say), but sold to the junta in power which weighs heavily in the total external debt, nor of the wholesale and retail sale of government agencies or corporations, and of the rights of water (in the 1990s), and the default of the government on various debts and contracts: 40 or more cases before the courts and ICSID — seems the sanctity of the contract and personalty of the international organization is a barrier to putting an end these very crooked and immoral business transactions, etc..

So when supermarkets, electricity providers, and petrol stations accept bitcoins, it will be natural for a user to stop selling bitcoins and «save even more money on fees».

The Australian startup Power Ledger raised $ 34 million Australian dollars in a September token sale, more than $ 26 million USD, and is already running pilot programs for people who want to buy or sell electricity from local solar panels.

New York City officials are now working with utility companies to allow property owners to sell the electricity produced by systems like CHP back to utility companies when they produce more electricity than the building needs.